Download

Uganda Judgment

High Court of Uganda

The Hair Care Center Ltd v Uganda Revenue Authority (Civil Appeal No.1 of 2001) [2002] UGHC 44 (22 January 2002)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The court held that while the appellant was required to pay storage charges to recover its impounded goods, it should not be penalized for customs offences committed solely by its agent, ATACO. The Tax Appeals Tribunal had exonerated the appellant from direct liability for the agent's actions, and therefore, imposing penalties on the appellant was improper. The agent, as the actual offender, should bear the penalty and be liable to reimburse the importer for any costs incurred due to the unlawful impounding of goods. The appeal was allowed in part, specifically regarding the penalty, with costs awarded to the appellant.

Court disposition

appeal_allowed_in_part

Orders

  • The appeal is allowed in respect of the penalty; the appellant is not liable for the penalty imposed for the agent's customs offence.
  • Costs are awarded to the appellant.

02

Material facts

Parties

The Hair Care Center Ltd

Appellant

Uganda Revenue Authority

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Civil Appeal / Judgment

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The appellant argued that it should not be held financially responsible for penalties and charges resulting from the customs offence committed by its agent, ATACO, as it did not authorize or participate in the agent's unlawful actions. The appellant contended that liability for penalties should rest solely with the agent who falsified invoices and attempted to evade taxes.
Respondent
The respondent maintained that the owner of the goods, regardless of the agent's actions, is responsible for paying taxes, penalties, and demurrage charges to recover its goods. The respondent argued that the appellant, as the importer, cannot escape financial responsibility vis-à-vis the Uganda Revenue Authority, and must seek recovery from its agent separately.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Tax Appeals Tribunal decision

    An importer is not vicariously liable for customs offences committed independently by its agent unless proven complicit or negligent.

  2. 02

    General principles of agency and liability in customs law

    Financial responsibility for taxes and storage charges may rest with the owner to recover goods, but penalties for offences should be imposed on the actual offender.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The court held that while the appellant was required to pay storage charges to recover its impounded goods, it should not be penalized for customs offences committed solely by its agent, ATACO. The Tax Appeals Tribunal had exonerated the appellant from direct liability for the agent's actions, and therefore, imposing penalties on the appellant was improper. The agent, as the actual offender, should bear the penalty and be liable to reimburse the importer for any costs incurred due to the unlawful impounding of goods. The appeal was allowed in part, specifically regarding the penalty, with costs awarded to the appellant.

Obiter and limits

  • The agent faces the Uganda Revenue Authority for the offence he committed and pays any penalty imposed against him.
  • The importer should feel free to recover money paid for storage from the agent following unlawful impounding of goods.
  • It is not proper to penalise someone for an offence for which another is independently guilty.

Court disposition

appeal_allowed_in_part

  • The appeal is allowed in respect of the penalty; the appellant is not liable for the penalty imposed for the agent's customs offence.
  • Costs are awarded to the appellant.

Source and reliance status

High Court of Uganda

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Source document

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

High Court of Uganda

Judgment

[2002] UGHC 44

{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\uc1\deff0\stshfdbch0\stshfloch0\stshfhich0\stshfbi0\deflang2057\deflangfe2057{\fonttbl{\f0\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02020603050405020304}Times New Roman;}{\f240\froman\fcharset238\fprq2 Times New Roman CE;} {\f241\froman\fcharset204\fprq2 Times New Roman Cyr;}{\f243\froman\fcharset161\fprq2 Times New Roman Greek;}{\f244\froman\fcharset162\fprq2 Times New Roman Tur;}{\f245\froman\fcharset177\fprq2 Times New Roman (Hebrew);} {\f246\froman\fcharset178\fprq2 Times New Roman (Arabic);}{\f247\froman\fcharset186\fprq2 Times New Roman Baltic;}{\f248\froman\fcharset163\fprq2 Times New Roman (Vietnamese);}}{\colortbl;\red0\green0\blue0;\red0\green0\blue255;\red0\green255\blue255; \red0\green255\blue0;\red255\green0\blue255;\red255\green0\blue0;\red255\green255\blue0;\red255\green255\blue255;\red0\green0\blue128;\red0\green128\blue128;\red0\green128\blue0;\red128\green0\blue128;\red128\green0\blue0;\red128\green128\blue0; \red128\green128\blue128;\red192\green192\blue192;}{\stylesheet{\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe2057\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp2057 \snext0 Normal;}{\*\cs10 \additive \ssemihidden Default Paragraph

Font;}{\*\ts11\tsrowd\trftsWidthB3\trpaddl108\trpaddr108\trpaddfl3\trpaddft3\trpaddfb3\trpaddfr3\trcbpat1\trcfpat1\tscellwidthfts0\tsvertalt\tsbrdrt\tsbrdrl\tsbrdrb\tsbrdrr\tsbrdrdgl\tsbrdrdgr\tsbrdrh\tsbrdrv \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs20\lang1024\langfe1024\cgrid\langnp1024\langfenp1024 \snext11 \ssemihidden Normal Table;}{ \s15\ql \li0\ri0\sb100\sa100\sbauto1\saauto1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe2057\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp2057 \sbasedon0 \snext15 \styrsid8524940 Normal (Web);}{\s16\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar \tqc\tx4153\tqr\tx8306\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe2057\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp2057 \sbasedon0 \snext16 \styrsid12913679 footer;}{\*\cs17 \additive \sbasedon10 \styrsid12913679 page number;}} {\*\latentstyles\lsdstimax156\lsdlockeddef0}{\*\pgptbl {\pgp\ipgp0\itap0\li0\ri0\sb0\sa0}}{\*\rsidtbl \rsid6346\rsid1334516\rsid6255162\rsid6446481\rsid8524940\rsid9246870\rsid12913679\rsid15560570\rsid15948781}{\*\generator Microsoft Word 11.0.5604;} {\info{\title THE REPUBLLIC OF UGANDA }{\author Administrator}{\operator kgalenda}{\creatim\yr2009\mo6\dy2\hr14\min30}{\revtim\yr2009\mo6\dy2\hr15\min25}{\version5}{\edmins55}{\nofpages3}{\nofwords574}{\nofchars3278}{\*\company JSI}{\nofcharsws3845} {\vern24689}}\paperw11906\paperh16838

\widowctrl\ftnbj\aenddoc\noxlattoyen\expshrtn\noultrlspc\dntblnsbdb\nospaceforul\formshade\horzdoc\dgmargin\dghspace180\dgvspace180\dghorigin1800\dgvorigin1440\dghshow1\dgvshow1 \jexpand\viewkind1\viewscale100\pgbrdrhead\pgbrdrfoot\splytwnine\ftnlytwnine\htmautsp\nolnhtadjtbl\useltbaln\alntblind\lytcalctblwd\lyttblrtgr\lnbrkrule\nobrkwrptbl\snaptogridincell\allowfieldendsel\wrppunct \asianbrkrule\rsidroot8524940\newtblstyruls\nogrowautofit \fet0{\*\ftnsep \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe2057\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp2057 {\insrsid12913679 \chftnsep \par }}{\*\ftnsepc \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe2057\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp2057 {\insrsid12913679 \chftnsepc \par }}{\*\aftnsep \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe2057\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp2057 {\insrsid12913679 \chftnsep \par }}{\*\aftnsepc \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe2057\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp2057 {\insrsid12913679 \chftnsepc \par }}\sectd \linex0\headery708\footery708\colsx708\endnhere\sectlinegrid360\sectdefaultcl\sectrsid6346\sftnbj {\footer \pard\plain \s16\ql

\li0\ri0\widctlpar \tqc\tx4153\tqr\tx8306\pvpara\phmrg\posxr\posy0\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid3087945 \fs24\lang2057\langfe2057\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp2057 {\field{\*\fldinst {\cs17\insrsid12913679 PAGE }}{\fldrslt { \cs17\lang1024\langfe1024\noproof\insrsid6255162 1}}}{\cs17\insrsid12913679 \par }\pard \s16\ql \li0\ri360\widctlpar\tqc\tx4153\tqr\tx8306\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin360\lin0\itap0\pararsid12913679 {\insrsid12913679 \par }}{\*\pnseclvl1\pnucrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl2\pnucltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl3\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl4\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta )}} {\*\pnseclvl5\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl6\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl7\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl8 \pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl9\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}\pard\plain \s15\qc \li0\ri0\sb100\sa240\sbauto1\sl360\slmult1 \widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\ipgp1\pararsid1334516 \fs24\lang2057\langfe2057\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp2057 {\b\ul\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid8524940\charrsid12913679 THE REPUBLLIC OF UGANDA

}{ \b\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid8524940\charrsid12913679 \line IN THE HIGH COURT OF UGANDA AT KAMPALA \line CIVIL APPEAL NO. 01 OF 2001 \line }{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid8524940\charrsid12913679 \line }{ \b\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid8524940\charrsid12913679 THE HAIR CARE CENTER LTD }{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid8524940\charrsid12913679 :::::::::::::::::::::::::}{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1334516 ::::::::}{ \lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid8524940\charrsid12913679 :::::::::::::: }{\b\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid8524940\charrsid12913679 APPELLANT \line VERSUS \line UGANDA}{\b\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid6446481 }{ \b\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid8524940\charrsid12913679 REVENUE}{\b\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid6446481 }{\b\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid8524940\charrsid12913679 AUTHORITY }{ \lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid8524940\charrsid12913679 :::::::::::::::::::::::}{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid6446481 :::::::}{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid8524940\charrsid12913679 :::::::::: }{ \b\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid8524940\charrsid12913679 RESPONDENT \line }{\b\ul\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid6255162\charrsid12913679 BEFORE:}{\ul\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid8524940\charrsid12913679

}{ \b\ul\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid8524940\charrsid12913679 THE HON. MR. JUSTICE R. O. OKUMU WENGI. }{\b\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid8524940\charrsid12913679 \line }{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid6446481 \par }\pard \s15\ql \li0\ri0\sb100\sa240\sbauto1\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\ipgp1\pararsid6446481 {\b\ul\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid8524940\charrsid12913679 JUDGMENT: }{ \b\ul\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid6446481 }{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid6446481\charrsid6446481 This}{ \lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid8524940\charrsid6446481 }{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid8524940\charrsid12913679 is an appeal by a Tax payer whom the Ta}{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid15948781 x appeals Tribunal on 14/02/2001 }{ \lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid8524940\charrsid12913679 ordered to pay taxes, penalties and demurrage on a consignment of Body Care \line products it imported. The decree from which this appeal arises was to the effect that though the appellant had not authorised the clearing agent who had }{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid6446481\charrsid12913679 under declared}{ \lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid8524940\charrsid12913679 the goods, and was not responsible for his actions as such, he could not escape liabilities to pay the levies.

The appellant ha}{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid6446481 d imported the }{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid8524940\charrsid12913679 goods from South Africa which were properly cleared by an agent ATACO, who in the course of its declarations was found to have falsified invoices with the possible result that taxes would be evaded. The goods were seized. However, the of fence was compounded such that the goods were released on condition}{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid6446481 that certain fines were paid. }{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid8524940\charrsid12913679 \par }\pard \s15\ql \li0\ri0\sb100\sa240\sbauto1\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\ipgp1\pararsid12913679 {\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid8524940\charrsid12913679 In the appeal two grounds were formulated as }{ \lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid6446481\charrsid12913679 follows:}{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid8524940\charrsid12913679 - \line }{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid6446481 \par }{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid8524940\charrsid12913679 1). That the Tribunal erred in law in holding that the appellant should bear the financial responsibility of the go}{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid6446481 ods in particular the penalty. }{\i\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid8524940\charrsid12913679 \line }{\i\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid6446481 \par }{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid8524940\charrsid12913679 2). The Tribunal erred in fact and law when it held that neither party was at fault and that each party should bear its own costs. \line }{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid15560570

\par }{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid8524940\charrsid12913679 In its decision the Tax Appeals Tribunal stated that the self appointed agent ATACO was the person guilty of the offence, and that the appellant was in the circumstances not to be held vicariously liable. What I have to decide in this appeal is whether an owner of imported goods in respect of which a customs offence is c ommitted but for which it is not liable should nevertheless be made to pay penalties and storage charges arising from the}{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid15560570 commission of that offence }{ \lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid8524940\charrsid12913679 by that party not before court. The Tax Appeals Tribunal in making its decision stated }{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid15560570\charrsid12913679 that: -}{ \lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid8524940\charrsid12913679 \line }{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid15560570 \par }\pard \s15\ql \li720\ri0\sb100\sa240\sbauto1\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin720\itap0\ipgp1\pararsid15560570 {\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid8524940\charrsid12913679 \'935. Although not responsible in the s}{ \lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid15560570 ense indicated in No. (2) above }{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid8524940\charrsid12913679 nevertheless the owner cannot escape the

finan}{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid15560570 cial responsibility for his }{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid8524940\charrsid12913679 goods vis a vis the respo}{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid15560570 ndent, he has to claim then by -}{ \lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid8524940\charrsid12913679 \line - paying the taxes due \line - paying the penalty and \line - paying the demurrage charges and costs, \line }{\i\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid15560570 \par }\pard \s15\ql \li0\ri0\sb100\sa240\sbauto1\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\ipgp1\pararsid15560570 {\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid8524940\charrsid12913679 this having clearly exonerated the appellant from the actions of the agent ATACO. It is this statement of liability that has evoked this appeal. \line }{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid15560570 \par }\pard \s15\ql \li0\ri0\sb100\sa240\sbauto1\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\ipgp1\pararsid12913679 {\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid8524940\charrsid12913679 I do agree that it is the agent who committed the offence with the result 30 that the goods of the appellant were to be}{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid15560570 unlawfully impounded. After }{ \lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid8524940\charrsid12913679 impounding them the

appellant had to pay the storage charges and recover them from the agent. However, when it comes to the penalty I do not think it is proper to penalise so meone for an offence for which another is independently guilty, or more accurately, liable to be charged }{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid15560570 with. Since the self appointed }{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid8524940\charrsid12913679 agent committed an offence in his own right and the Tax Appeals Tribunal did not convict the appellant for it, the Ta x Appeals Tribunal could not properly condemn the importer, and the Appellant should collect the penalty directly from the agent. Similarly the importer should feel free to recover money that it pays for storage of the goods following their being unlawful l}{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid15560570 y impounded, from the }{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid8524940\charrsid12913679 agent. In other words the agent faces the Uganda Revenue Authority for the offence he committed and also pays any penalty imposed against it and would also be liable to reimburse the importer for the costs of storage paid by the i mporter for storage of his goods. \line }{\i\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid15560570 \par }{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid8524940\charrsid12913679 In the result I would allow this appeal in part as related to the penalty

w}{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid15560570 ith costs to the appellant. \line \par }{\b\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid8524940\charrsid12913679 R. O. OKUMU WENGI \line JUDGE \line 22/01/02. \line }{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid8524940\charrsid12913679 \par }\pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid12913679 \fs24\lang2057\langfe2057\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp2057 {\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid8524940\charrsid12913679 \par }}

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

No structured authorities are available for this judgment.

Refer to the full judgment and official source for citations that have not yet been extracted.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this JurisAssist collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.