Download

Uganda Judgment

HC: Criminal Division (Uganda)

Tegga v Uganda (Criminal Miscellaneous Application 27 of 2023) [2023] UGHCCRD 27 (5 April 2023)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The applicant has been on remand for over six months without committal to the High Court for trial on an offence triable only by the High Court. Article 23(6)(c) of the Constitution mandates release on bail in such circumstances, removing judicial discretion to deny bail. The applicant demonstrated a fixed place of abode and presented two substantial sureties who were found suitable by the court. The court, therefore, granted bail on reasonable conditions, including a cash deposit and surety bonds, and imposed reporting requirements.

Court disposition

bail granted on conditions

Orders

  • The applicant shall deposit in court a sum of Uganda Shillings 2,000,000 in cash.
  • Each of the two sureties is bound in the sum of Uganda Shillings 30,000,000 not cash.
  • The applicant shall report to the Assistant Registrar at Mubende court every 5th day of the month or on the next working day if the date falls on a weekend or a public holiday.

02

Material facts

Parties

Tegga Alex

Applicant Counsel: Ms. Asia Mbetabye

Uganda

Respondent Counsel: Mr. Kakooza Fred

Amounts and remedies

  • Applicant Cash Bail Amount: UGX 2,000,000
  • Surety Bond Amount (each): UGX 30,000,000

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Criminal Miscellaneous Application / Bail Application at High Court Prior to Committal for Trial

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The applicant argued that he has been on remand for eight months without committal to the High Court, has a fixed place of abode within the court's jurisdiction, and has substantial sureties. He invoked his constitutional right to bail and the infringement of his right to a fair and speedy trial.
Respondent
The respondent did not oppose the application and left the decision to the discretion of the court.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Article 23(6)(a) and Article 28(3)(a) of the Constitution of Uganda

    An accused person is entitled to apply for bail under Article 23(6)(a) of the Constitution, and the court has discretion to grant or deny bail, subject to the presumption of innocence.

  2. 02

    Article 23(6)(c) of the Constitution of Uganda; Constitution (Bail Guidelines for Courts of Judicature) (Practice) Directions, 2022, Legal Notice No.8 of 2022

    Where an accused has been in custody for 180 days on an offence triable only by the High Court and has not been committed for trial, the person shall be released on bail on reasonable conditions; the court has no discretion to deny bail in such circumstances.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The applicant has been on remand for over six months without committal to the High Court for trial on an offence triable only by the High Court. Article 23(6)(c) of the Constitution mandates release on bail in such circumstances, removing judicial discretion to deny bail. The applicant demonstrated a fixed place of abode and presented two substantial sureties who were found suitable by the court. The court, therefore, granted bail on reasonable conditions, including a cash deposit and surety bonds, and imposed reporting requirements.

Obiter and limits

  • The presumption of innocence under Article 28(3)(a) of the Constitution underpins the right to bail.
  • The suitability of sureties is a relevant consideration even where bail is mandatory.

Court disposition

bail granted on conditions

  • The applicant shall deposit in court a sum of Uganda Shillings 2,000,000 in cash.
  • Each of the two sureties is bound in the sum of Uganda Shillings 30,000,000 not cash.
  • The applicant shall report to the Assistant Registrar at Mubende court every 5th day of the month or on the next working day if the date falls on a weekend or a public holiday.

Source and reliance status

HC: Criminal Division (Uganda)

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Source document

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

HC: Criminal Division (Uganda)

Judgment

[2023] UGHCCRD 27

THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UGANDA AT MUBENDE CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO.0027 OF 2023 [Arising from KASANDA CRIM CASE 128/2022. CRB 966/2022]

TEGGA ALEX

APPLICANT

VERSUS

UGANDA

RESPONDENT

BEFORE HON JUSTICE MOSES KAZIBWE KAWUMI

RULING

The Applicant stands charged with Aggravated Defilement contrary to Sections $129(3)\&(4)$ of the Penal Code Act and has applied for bail citing Article 23(6)(a)(C), 28(1) and 44(C) of the Constitution. Section 14 of the Trial on Indictments Act and other the enabling legislation.

The grounds of the Application which are further reiterated in the Affidavit filed in support by the Applicant are;-

- 1. That he has substantial sureties ready to stand for him to ensure that he does not abscond from trial and his right to a fair and speedy trial enshrined in the Constitution has been infringed by the state. - 2. That he has a fixed place of abode at Lugingi village, Lugingi Parish. Kijuma sub- county in Kasanda District within the jurisdiction of the court and has not been committed to the High Court for trial within the six months period stipulated in the law.

3. That it is in the interest of justice that he is released on bail pending trial.

In the Affidavit supporting the Application the applicant states that he is 37 years old and was charged with the offence on 18<sup>th</sup> August 2022 but has not been committed for trial for now 8 months.

Representation.

The Applicant was represented by Ms. Asia Mbetabye. The Respondent was represented by Mr. Kakooza Fred (Assistant DPP).

Counsel for the Applicant reiterated the Applicant's constitutional right to apply for bail emphasizing the eight months period he has spent on remand without being committed to the High Court for trial. It was further emphasized that the applicant has a fixed place of abode within the jurisdiction of the court and has sureties to ensure that he does not abscond from trial.

Counsel for the Respondent did not oppose the application and left it to the discretion of the court for an appropriate decision.

Decision.

I have considered the averments in both the Application and the affidavit in support sworn by the Applicant. I have also carefully considered the submissions made by Counsel for the Applicant.

It is trite law that any accused person is entitled to apply for bail under Article 23(6)(a) of the Constitution. The Court has the discretion to either grant or deny that person bail. This is premised on the principle that the accused person is presumed innocent until he either pleads guilty or is found guilty after the due process under Article 28(3) (a) of the Constitution.

$\overline{2}$

The Applicant is charged with an offence triable only by the High court. Article 23(6)( $c$ ) of the Constitution provides;-

"Where the accused has been in custody for 180 days on an offence triable by the High Court only and has not been committed to the High Court for trial, that person shall be released on bail on reasonable conditions."

The wording of Article 23(6)(C) of the Constitution denies court of any discretion as to whether to grant bail or not. The court is only restricted to the determination of what may be reasonable terms given the peculiar circumstances of each case.

The mandatory release on bail pending trial for an applicant who has not been committed to the High Court for trial within the stipulated six months period is further emphasized in Guidelines 9 and $10(1)$ of the Constitution (Bail Guidelines for Courts of Judicature) (Practice) Directions, 2022. Legal Notice No.8 of 2022.

The Applicant is confirmed to have a permanent place of abode at Lugingi Village, Lugingi Parish, Kijjuna Sub County in Kassanda District and produced a letter of introduction as a resident authored by a one Sanvula Jamali the Village Chairman.

The Applicant produced two sureties:-

- i) Munyaneza Innocent, 38 years old and a resident of Lugingi Village and a brother of the Applicant. He holds National Identity Card Number CM PM 85031107L35J. The Surety furnished court with a Letter of Introduction by the Village Chairman and can be accessed on Telephone numbers 0705 702559. - ii) Kibuule Jude, 48 years old and a resident of Lugingi Village, a brother of the Applicant The Surety holds National Identity Card Number CM 74036109UJWL. He produced a letter of introduction

$\overline{3}$

authored by Chairman Sanvula Jamali and can be contacted on Telephone numbers 0784981661.

The sureties presented are adults who reside in the same locality with the Applicant and fully understood their obligations. They have no known antecedents and produced documents introducing them. I find no reason not to deem them suitable for purposes of this application.

I grant bail to the Applicant on the following terms;-

- a) The Applicant shall deposit in court a sum of Uganda Shillings $2,000,000/-$ in cash. - b) Each of the two sureties is bound in the sum of Uganda Shillings $30,000,000/-$ not cash. - c) The Applicant shall report to the Assistant Registrar at Mubende court every $5<sup>th</sup>$ day of the month or on the next working day if the date falls on a weekend or a Public holiday.

Moses Kazibwe Kawumi Judge 5<sup>th</sup> April 2023

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Constitution of the Republic of Uganda, Articles 23(6)(a), 23(6)(c), 28(1), 28(3)(a), 44(c)

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Penal Code Act, Sections 129(3) and (4)

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Trial on Indictments Act, Section 14

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Constitution (Bail Guidelines for Courts of Judicature) (Practice) Directions, 2022, Legal Notice No.8 of 2022

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this JurisAssist collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.