Share
Serunjogi Mukibi v Lule Umar Mawiya [2007] UGSC 16 (20 June 2007)
- Citation
- [2007] UGSC 16
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Uganda
- Court
- Supreme Court of Uganda
- Posture
- Civil Appeal / Final Judgment
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- Supreme Court of Uganda
- Posture
- Civil Appeal / Final Judgment
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The Supreme Court held that the Court of Appeal adequately re-evaluated the evidence from the High Court and correctly concluded that the appellant was not qualified for nomination as a Member of Parliament due to lack of requisite academic qualifications. The Court found no error in the evaluation of evidence or the conclusions reached by the lower courts. The appeal was dismissed for lack of merit.
Court disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed with costs to the respondent and the courts below.
02
Material facts
Parties
Serunjogi Mukiibi
AppellantLule Umar Mawiya
Respondent03
Procedural history
Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Judgment
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the appellant was qualified to contest the election as a Member of Parliament.
- 02
Whether the Court of Appeal properly re-evaluated the evidence before reaching its conclusion.
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The appellant argued that the Court of Appeal failed to properly re-evaluate the evidence and erred in concluding that he lacked the requisite academic qualifications to contest for Member of Parliament. He maintained that he met all legal requirements for nomination.
- Respondent
- The respondent contended that both the High Court and the Court of Appeal correctly found that the appellant did not possess the necessary academic qualifications for nomination as a Member of Parliament. The respondent asserted that the evidence was properly evaluated and the decisions were justified.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Constitution of the Republic of Uganda, Parliamentary Elections Act
A candidate for Member of Parliament must possess the requisite academic qualifications as prescribed by law.
- 02
Ugandan appellate procedure jurisprudence
Appellate courts are required to re-evaluate evidence and reach their own conclusions on appeal.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The Supreme Court held that the Court of Appeal adequately re-evaluated the evidence from the High Court and correctly concluded that the appellant was not qualified for nomination as a Member of Parliament due to lack of requisite academic qualifications. The Court found no error in the evaluation of evidence or the conclusions reached by the lower courts. The appeal was dismissed for lack of merit.
Obiter and limits
- The Court emphasized the importance of academic qualifications for parliamentary candidates as a safeguard for the integrity of the electoral process.
- The Court noted that appellate review must be thorough and independent, but found that the Court of Appeal met this standard in the present case.
Court disposition
appeal dismissed
- The appeal is dismissed with costs to the respondent and the courts below.
Source and reliance status
Supreme Court of Uganda
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Supreme Court of Uganda
Judgment
{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\uc1\deff0\stshfdbch0\stshfloch0\stshfhich0\stshfbi0\deflang1033\deflangfe1033{\fonttbl{\f0\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02020603050405020304}Times New Roman;}{\f36\froman\fcharset238\fprq2 Times New Roman CE;} {\f37\froman\fcharset204\fprq2 Times New Roman Cyr;}{\f39\froman\fcharset161\fprq2 Times New Roman Greek;}{\f40\froman\fcharset162\fprq2 Times New Roman Tur;}{\f41\froman\fcharset177\fprq2 Times New Roman (Hebrew);} {\f42\froman\fcharset178\fprq2 Times New Roman (Arabic);}{\f43\froman\fcharset186\fprq2 Times New Roman Baltic;}{\f44\froman\fcharset163\fprq2 Times New Roman (Vietnamese);}}{\colortbl;\red0\green0\blue0;\red0\green0\blue255;\red0\green255\blue255; \red0\green255\blue0;\red255\green0\blue255;\red255\green0\blue0;\red255\green255\blue0;\red255\green255\blue255;\red0\green0\blue128;\red0\green128\blue128;\red0\green128\blue0;\red128\green0\blue128;\red128\green0\blue0;\red128\green128\blue0; \red128\green128\blue128;\red192\green192\blue192;}{\stylesheet{\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \snext0 Normal;}{\*\cs10 \additive \ssemihidden Default Paragraph
Font;}{\*\ts11\tsrowd\trftsWidthB3\trpaddl108\trpaddr108\trpaddfl3\trpaddft3\trpaddfb3\trpaddfr3\trcbpat1\trcfpat1\tscellwidthfts0\tsvertalt\tsbrdrt\tsbrdrl\tsbrdrb\tsbrdrr\tsbrdrdgl\tsbrdrdgr\tsbrdrh\tsbrdrv \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs20\lang1024\langfe1024\cgrid\langnp1024\langfenp1024 \snext11 \ssemihidden Normal Table;}{\s15\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar \tqc\tx4320\tqr\tx8640\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext15 \styrsid8877791 footer;}{\*\cs16 \additive \sbasedon10 \styrsid8877791 page number;}} {\*\latentstyles\lsdstimax156\lsdlockeddef0}{\*\rsidtbl \rsid948953\rsid1835643\rsid3215162\rsid3299882\rsid3501615\rsid3877359\rsid6498287\rsid8418274\rsid8539349\rsid8877791\rsid10826441\rsid11211205\rsid12350290\rsid13059629\rsid15952753\rsid16194587} {\*\generator Microsoft Word 11.0.5604;}{\info{\title THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA}{\author Supreme court of Uganda}{\operator Wor. Jessica chemeri}{\creatim\yr2008\mo4\dy14\hr10\min8}{\revtim\yr2008\mo4\dy14\hr10\min8}{\printim\yr2007\mo6\dy21\min30} {\version2}{\edmins1}{\nofpages2}{\nofwords296}{\nofchars1692}{\*\company Courts of
Judicature}{\nofcharsws1985}{\vern24689}}\paperw11907\paperh16840\margl1134\margr1134\margt1134\margb1134 \widowctrl\ftnbj\aenddoc\noxlattoyen\expshrtn\noultrlspc\dntblnsbdb\nospaceforul\formshade\horzdoc\dgmargin\dghspace120\dgvspace180\dghorigin1134\dgvorigin1134\dghshow2\dgvshow2 \jexpand\viewkind1\viewscale75\pgbrdrhead\pgbrdrfoot\splytwnine\ftnlytwnine\htmautsp\nolnhtadjtbl\useltbaln\alntblind\lytcalctblwd\lyttblrtgr\lnbrkrule\nobrkwrptbl\snaptogridincell\allowfieldendsel\wrppunct \asianbrkrule\rsidroot10826441\newtblstyruls\nogrowautofit \fet0{\*\ftnsep \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid8539349 \chftnsep \par }}{\*\ftnsepc \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid8539349 \chftnsepc \par }}{\*\aftnsep \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid8539349 \chftnsep \par }}{\*\aftnsepc \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid8539349 \chftnsepc \par }}\sectd
\psz9\linex0\headery709\footery709\colsx708\endnhere\sectlinegrid360\sectdefaultcl\sectrsid12350290\sftnbj {\footer \pard\plain \s15\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar \tqc\tx4320\tqr\tx8640\pvpara\phmrg\posxr\posy0\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid8539349 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\field{\*\fldinst {\cs16\insrsid8877791 PAGE }}{\fldrslt { \cs16\lang1024\langfe1024\noproof\insrsid15952753 1}}}{\cs16\insrsid8877791 \par }\pard \s15\ql \li0\ri360\widctlpar\tqc\tx4320\tqr\tx8640\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin360\lin0\itap0\pararsid8877791 {\insrsid8877791 \par }}{\*\pnseclvl1\pnucrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl2\pnucltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl3\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl4\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta )}} {\*\pnseclvl5\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl6\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl7\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl8 \pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl9\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}\pard\plain \qc \li0\ri0\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid948953 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033
{\b\fs32\insrsid6498287\charrsid6498287 THE}{\b\fs32\insrsid6498287 REPUBLIC OF UGANDA \par }{\b\fs28\insrsid6498287\charrsid948953 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF UGANDA \par AT MENGO \par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid6498287 {\i\fs28\insrsid6498287\charrsid948953 (CORAM:\tab ODOK}{\i\fs28\insrsid16194587 I, C. J, TSEKOOKO, MULENGA, KANY}{\i\fs28\insrsid6498287\charrsid948953 E}{ \i\fs28\insrsid16194587 I}{\i\fs28\insrsid6498287\charrsid948953 HAMBA, KATUREEBE, J. J. S. C) \par \par }{\b\fs32\insrsid6498287 CIVIL APPEAL}{\b\fs32\insrsid948953 [ELECTION PETITION] NO. 06 OF 2007}{\b\fs32\insrsid6498287 \par }{\b\fs32\insrsid948953 \par }{\b\fs28\insrsid948953\charrsid948953 BETWEEN \par \par SERUNJOGI MUKIIBI::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::APPELLANT \par AND \par LULE UMAR MAWIYA::::::::::::::::::::::::::::RESPONDENT}{\b\fs28\insrsid948953 \par \par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid948953 {\b\i\fs22\insrsid948953\charrsid16194587 [Appeal arising from the judgment and decision of G. M. Okello,}{\b\i\fs22\insrsid3877359 }{ \b\i\fs22\insrsid948953\charrsid16194587 S. G. Engwau, C. K. Byamugisha, J. J. A, dated 19}{\b\i\fs22\super\insrsid948953\charrsid16194587 th}{\b\i\fs22\insrsid948953\charrsid16194587 January,2007 in Election Petition Appeal No. 15 of
2006] \par }{\b\fs22\ul\insrsid948953\charrsid16194587 \par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid6498287 {\b\fs32\ul\insrsid6498287\charrsid6498287 JUDGMENT OF THE COURT.}{\b\fs32\ul\insrsid12350290\charrsid6498287 \par }{\b\fs32\ul\insrsid10826441\charrsid6498287 \par }\pard \qj \li0\ri0\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid16194587 {\fs28\insrsid10826441\charrsid6498287 This is a second appeal by the appellant whose election as}{\fs28\insrsid1835643 a}{ \fs28\insrsid10826441\charrsid6498287 }{\fs28\insrsid6498287\charrsid6498287 Member of Parliament}{\fs28\insrsid6498287 for Kalungu East C}{\fs28\insrsid10826441\charrsid6498287 onstituency was }{\fs28\insrsid6498287 successfully challenged in the H}{ \fs28\insrsid10826441\charrsid6498287 igh }{\fs28\insrsid6498287 C}{\fs28\insrsid10826441\charrsid6498287 ourt and t}{\fs28\insrsid6498287 hat decision was upheld by the Court of A}{\fs28\insrsid10826441\charrsid6498287 ppeal. \par \par From }{\fs28\insrsid6498287 the trial to this C}{\fs28\insrsid10826441\charrsid6498287 ourt, the main issue was whether the appellant was qualifie}{\fs28\insrsid6498287 d to contest the election as a Member of P}{\fs28\insrsid10826441\charrsid6498287 arliament. Both }{\fs28\insrsid6498287 the trial Court and the Court of
A}{\fs28\insrsid10826441\charrsid6498287 ppeal held that he was not so qualified. \par \par The ma}{\fs28\insrsid6498287 jor complaint here is that the Court of A}{\fs28\insrsid10826441\charrsid6498287 ppeal did not re-evaluate the evidence before making its own conclusions}{\fs28\insrsid3215162 .}{\fs28\insrsid10826441\charrsid6498287 }{ \fs28\insrsid3215162 A}{\fs28\insrsid10826441\charrsid6498287 fter perusing the record and considering the written submissions from both par}{\fs28\insrsid6498287 ties we are satisfied that the Court of A}{\fs28\insrsid10826441\charrsid6498287 ppeal adequately re-evaluated the evidence in t}{\fs28\insrsid6498287 he High C}{\fs28\insrsid10826441\charrsid6498287 ourt and came to its own conclusion that the appellant was not}{\fs28\insrsid6498287 qualified for nomination as a Member of P}{ \fs28\insrsid10826441\charrsid6498287 arliament because he did not have the requisite academic qualifications. \par \par We }{\fs28\insrsid6498287 find that, the Court of A}{\fs28\insrsid10826441\charrsid6498287 ppeal was justified in coming to that conclusion on the evidence on record. We }{\fs28\insrsid6498287 are not persuaded that the Court of A}{ \fs28\insrsid10826441\charrsid6498287 ppeal erred in the evaluation of the evidence and its conclusions. \par }\pard \qj \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid6498287
{\fs28\insrsid10826441\charrsid6498287 \par }\pard \qj \li0\ri0\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid16194587 {\fs28\insrsid10826441\charrsid6498287 Accordingly we find no merit in the appeal which is hereby dismissed with costs}{\fs28\insrsid6498287 here and the C}{\fs28\insrsid10826441\charrsid6498287 ourts below. \par \par }\pard \qj \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid6498287 {\b\fs28\insrsid948953 \par }{\b\fs32\insrsid10826441\charrsid16194587 Dated}{\fs32\insrsid10826441\charrsid16194587 }{\fs32\insrsid6498287\charrsid16194587 at M}{\fs32\insrsid10826441\charrsid16194587 engo this }{\b\fs32\insrsid10826441\charrsid16194587 20}{ \b\fs32\super\insrsid10826441\charrsid16194587 th}{\fs32\insrsid10826441\charrsid16194587 day of }{\b\fs32\insrsid6498287\charrsid16194587 June}{\fs32\insrsid6498287\charrsid16194587 , 2007}{\fs32\insrsid948953\charrsid16194587 .}{ \fs32\insrsid10826441\charrsid16194587 \par }{\fs32\insrsid948953\charrsid16194587 \par }{\fs32\insrsid6498287\charrsid16194587 \par }{\fs28\insrsid6498287\charrsid6498287 \par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid6498287 {\fs28\insrsid6498287\charrsid6498287 B. J. ODOKI \par }{\b\fs28\insrsid6498287\charrsid6498287 CHIEF JUSTICE \par \par \par }{\fs28\insrsid6498287\charrsid6498287
J. N. W. TSEKOOKO \par }{\b\fs28\insrsid6498287\charrsid6498287 JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT \par \par \par }{\fs28\insrsid6498287\charrsid6498287 J. N. MULENGA \par }{\b\fs28\insrsid6498287\charrsid6498287 JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT \par \par \par }{\fs28\insrsid6498287\charrsid6498287 G. W. KANYEIHAMBA \par }{\b\fs28\insrsid6498287\charrsid6498287 JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT \par \par \par }{\fs28\insrsid6498287\charrsid6498287 B. KATUREEBE \par }{\b\fs28\insrsid6498287\charrsid6498287 JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT \par \par }}
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.