Share
S Mwijakubi and Ors v British American Tobacco Uganda Ltd (HCT-00-CC-MA 298 of 2005) [2005] UGCommC 17 (4 May 2005)
- Citation
- [2005] UGCommC 17
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Uganda
- Court
- Commercial Court of Uganda
- Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling
- Case number
- HCT-00-CC-MA 298 of 2005
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- Commercial Court of Uganda
- Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling
- Case number
- HCT-00-CC-MA 298 of 2005
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The court found that the respondents had obtained the necessary permission to bring the suit in a representative capacity and that notice was properly published in accordance with Order 1 Rule 8 of the Civil Procedure Rules. The discrepancy in the number of persons listed in the court order and the published notice was deemed immaterial, as the law does not require an exact figure but rather a common interest among those represented. The application to strike out the suit was therefore without merit and was dismissed with costs awarded to the respondents.
Court disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- The application to strike out the head suit is dismissed.
- Costs of the application are awarded to the respondents.
02
Material facts
Parties
British American Tobacco Uganda Ltd
Applicant Counsel: Dr. ByamugishaSedrach MwijaKubi
Respondent Counsel: Mr. MuwemaMukitale Asiimwe
Respondent Counsel: Mr. MuwemaJoshua Byangire
Respondent Counsel: Mr. MuwemaFenakansi Byabesiza
Respondent Counsel: Mr. MuwemaSolomon Kiiza
Respondent Counsel: Mr. Muwema03
Procedural history
Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the respondents had proper permission to institute a representative suit on behalf of the listed persons.
- 02
Whether the court published adequate notice of the institution of the suit to the persons represented.
- 03
Whether the discrepancy in the number of persons listed in the court order and the published notice invalidates the representative action.
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The applicant argued that the respondents did not seek or obtain court permission to sue on behalf of the persons listed in annexture B to the plaint, and that the court did not publish notice of the suit to those persons as required by law. Additionally, the applicant contended that the discrepancy between the number of persons in the court order (2500) and the published notice (2838) contravened Order 1 Rule 8 of the Civil Procedure Rules, rendering the suit invalid.
- Respondent
- The respondents, through an affidavit by their advocate, asserted that court permission was granted for the representative action and that notice was duly published in the Monitor Newspaper on 30th March 2005. They argued that the discrepancy in numbers was immaterial, as the basis for permission is common interest, not exact figures, and that representative actions can be brought on behalf of fluctuating groups.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Order 1 Rule 8, Civil Procedure Rules
Representative actions are permitted to avoid multiplicity of proceedings where numerous persons share a common interest in the subject matter.
- 02
Order 1 Rule 8, Civil Procedure Rules; judicial interpretation
The exact number of persons represented in a suit is not material, provided there is a common interest among the group.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The court found that the respondents had obtained the necessary permission to bring the suit in a representative capacity and that notice was properly published in accordance with Order 1 Rule 8 of the Civil Procedure Rules. The discrepancy in the number of persons listed in the court order and the published notice was deemed immaterial, as the law does not require an exact figure but rather a common interest among those represented. The application to strike out the suit was therefore without merit and was dismissed with costs awarded to the respondents.
Obiter and limits
- Representative actions may be brought on behalf of fluctuating groups, and the ascertainment of exact numbers is not a legal requirement.
- The purpose of representative actions is to avoid a multiplicity of suits over the same subject matter.
Court disposition
application dismissed
- The application to strike out the head suit is dismissed.
- Costs of the application are awarded to the respondents.
Source and reliance status
Commercial Court of Uganda
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Commercial Court of Uganda
Judgment
{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\uc1\deff0\stshfdbch0\stshfloch0\stshfhich0\stshfbi0\deflang1033\deflangfe1033{\fonttbl{\f0\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02020603050405020304}Times New Roman;}{\f37\froman\fcharset238\fprq2 Times New Roman CE;} {\f38\froman\fcharset204\fprq2 Times New Roman Cyr;}{\f40\froman\fcharset161\fprq2 Times New Roman Greek;}{\f41\froman\fcharset162\fprq2 Times New Roman Tur;}{\f42\froman\fcharset177\fprq2 Times New Roman (Hebrew);} {\f43\froman\fcharset178\fprq2 Times New Roman (Arabic);}{\f44\froman\fcharset186\fprq2 Times New Roman Baltic;}{\f45\froman\fcharset163\fprq2 Times New Roman (Vietnamese);}}{\colortbl;\red0\green0\blue0;\red0\green0\blue255;\red0\green255\blue255; \red0\green255\blue0;\red255\green0\blue255;\red255\green0\blue0;\red255\green255\blue0;\red255\green255\blue255;\red0\green0\blue128;\red0\green128\blue128;\red0\green128\blue0;\red128\green0\blue128;\red128\green0\blue0;\red128\green128\blue0; \red128\green128\blue128;\red192\green192\blue192;}{\stylesheet{\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp1033 \snext0 \styrsid15534136 Normal;}{\*\cs10 \additive \ssemihidden Default Paragraph
Font;}{\*\ts11\tsrowd\trftsWidthB3\trpaddl108\trpaddr108\trpaddfl3\trpaddft3\trpaddfb3\trpaddfr3\tscellwidthfts0\tsvertalt\tsbrdrt\tsbrdrl\tsbrdrb\tsbrdrr\tsbrdrdgl\tsbrdrdgr\tsbrdrh\tsbrdrv \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs20\lang1024\langfe1024\cgrid\langnp1024\langfenp1024 \snext11 \ssemihidden Normal Table;}{\s15\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar \tqc\tx4320\tqr\tx8640\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext15 \styrsid16597272 footer;}{\*\cs16 \additive \sbasedon10 \styrsid16597272 page number;}} {\*\latentstyles\lsdstimax156\lsdlockeddef0}{\*\listtable{\list\listtemplateid-2128058962\listhybrid{\listlevel\levelnfc0\levelnfcn0\leveljc0\leveljcn0\levelfollow0\levelstartat1\levelspace360\levelindent0{\leveltext\leveltemplateid67698703 \'02\'00.;}{\levelnumbers\'01;}\fi-360\li720\jclisttab\tx720\lin720 }{\listlevel\levelnfc4\levelnfcn4\leveljc0\leveljcn0\levelfollow0\levelstartat1\levelspace360\levelindent0{\leveltext\leveltemplateid67698713\'02\'01.;}{\levelnumbers\'01;}\fi-360\li1440 \jclisttab\tx1440\lin1440 }{\listlevel\levelnfc2\levelnfcn2\leveljc2\leveljcn2\levelfollow0\levelstartat1\levelspace360\levelindent0{\leveltext\leveltemplateid67698715\'02\'02.;}{\levelnumbers\'01;}\fi-180\li2160\jclisttab\tx2160\lin2160
}{\listlevel \levelnfc0\levelnfcn0\leveljc0\leveljcn0\levelfollow0\levelstartat1\levelspace360\levelindent0{\leveltext\leveltemplateid67698703\'02\'03.;}{\levelnumbers\'01;}\fi-360\li2880\jclisttab\tx2880\lin2880 }{\listlevel\levelnfc4\levelnfcn4\leveljc0\leveljcn0 \levelfollow0\levelstartat1\levelspace360\levelindent0{\leveltext\leveltemplateid67698713\'02\'04.;}{\levelnumbers\'01;}\fi-360\li3600\jclisttab\tx3600\lin3600 }{\listlevel\levelnfc2\levelnfcn2\leveljc2\leveljcn2\levelfollow0\levelstartat1\levelspace360 \levelindent0{\leveltext\leveltemplateid67698715\'02\'05.;}{\levelnumbers\'01;}\fi-180\li4320\jclisttab\tx4320\lin4320 }{\listlevel\levelnfc0\levelnfcn0\leveljc0\leveljcn0\levelfollow0\levelstartat1\levelspace360\levelindent0{\leveltext \leveltemplateid67698703\'02\'06.;}{\levelnumbers\'01;}\fi-360\li5040\jclisttab\tx5040\lin5040 }{\listlevel\levelnfc4\levelnfcn4\leveljc0\leveljcn0\levelfollow0\levelstartat1\levelspace360\levelindent0{\leveltext\leveltemplateid67698713 \'02\'07.;}{\levelnumbers\'01;}\fi-360\li5760\jclisttab\tx5760\lin5760 }{\listlevel\levelnfc2\levelnfcn2\leveljc2\leveljcn2\levelfollow0\levelstartat1\levelspace360\levelindent0{\leveltext\leveltemplateid67698715\'02\'08.;}{\levelnumbers\'01;} \fi-180\li6480\jclisttab\tx6480\lin6480 }{\listname ;}\listid285160866}}{\*\listoverridetable{\listoverride\listid285160866\listoverridecount0\ls1}}{\*\rsidtbl
\rsid658720\rsid2426498\rsid4594768\rsid4656572\rsid5509199\rsid7042057\rsid8455187 \rsid12259043\rsid14295470\rsid15534136\rsid16597272}{\*\generator Microsoft Word 11.0.6568;}{\info{\title THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA}{\author Egonda-Ntende}{\operator Harry Mak}{\creatim\yr2006\mo2\dy7\hr10\min14}{\revtim\yr2006\mo2\dy7\hr10\min14} {\printim\yr2005\mo4\dy29\hr13\min39}{\version2}{\edmins0}{\nofpages2}{\nofwords460}{\nofchars2622}{\*\company Courts of Judicature}{\nofcharsws3076}{\vern24579}} \widowctrl\ftnbj\aenddoc\noxlattoyen\expshrtn\noultrlspc\dntblnsbdb\nospaceforul\formshade\horzdoc\dgmargin\dghspace180\dgvspace180\dghorigin1800\dgvorigin1440\dghshow1\dgvshow1 \jexpand\viewkind1\viewscale100\pgbrdrhead\pgbrdrfoot\splytwnine\ftnlytwnine\htmautsp\nolnhtadjtbl\useltbaln\alntblind\lytcalctblwd\lyttblrtgr\lnbrkrule\nobrkwrptbl\snaptogridincell\allowfieldendsel\wrppunct \asianbrkrule\rsidroot15534136\newtblstyruls\nogrowautofit \fet0{\*\ftnsep \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp1033 {\insrsid8455187 \chftnsep \par }}{\*\ftnsepc \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp1033 {\insrsid8455187 \chftnsepc \par }}{\*\aftnsep \pard\plain \ql
\li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp1033 {\insrsid8455187 \chftnsep \par }}{\*\aftnsepc \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp1033 {\insrsid8455187 \chftnsepc \par }}\sectd \linex0\endnhere\titlepg\sectlinegrid360\sectdefaultcl\sectrsid16597272\sftnbj {\footer \pard\plain \s15\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\tqc\tx4320\tqr\tx8640\pvpara\phmrg\posxc\posy0\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid8455187 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp1033 {\field{\*\fldinst {\cs16\insrsid4656572 PAGE }}{\fldrslt {\cs16\lang1024\langfe1024\noproof\insrsid5509199 2}}}{\cs16\insrsid4656572 \par }\pard \s15\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\tqc\tx4320\tqr\tx8640\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\insrsid4656572 \par }}{\*\pnseclvl1\pnucrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl2\pnucltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl3\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl4\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta )}} {\*\pnseclvl5\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl6\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl7\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta
)}}{\*\pnseclvl8 \pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl9\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}\pard\plain \qc \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid15534136 \fs24\lang2057\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp1033 {\insrsid15534136 THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA \par \par IN THE HIGH COURT OF UGANDA AT KAMPALA \par \par [COMMERCIAL DIVISION] \par \par \par HCT-00-CC-MA-0298 -2005 \par \par [Arising from HCT-00-CC-CS-286-2005] \par \par \par \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid15534136 {\insrsid15534136 BRITISH AMERICAN TOBACCO UGANDA LTD }{\insrsid14295470 APPLICANT}{\insrsid15534136 \par }{\insrsid14295470 \par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid14295470 {\insrsid14295470 Versus \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid15534136 {\insrsid14295470 \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid14295470 {\insrsid14295470 1. SEDRACH MWIJAKUBI RESPONDENTS \par 2. MUKITALE ASIIMWE \par 3. JOSHUA BYANGIRE \par 4. FENAKANSI BYABESIZA \par 5. SOLOMON KIIZA \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid15534136 {\insrsid14295470 \par
}{\insrsid15534136 \par }{\b\ul\insrsid15534136\charrsid5659149 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE FMS EGONDA-NTENDE \par \par RULING}{\b\ul\insrsid15534136 \par }{\b\ul\insrsid14295470 \par {\listtext\pard\plain\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid14295470 \hich\af0\dbch\af0\loch\f0 1.\tab}}\pard \ql \fi-360\li720\ri0\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\jclisttab\tx720\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\ls1\adjustright\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid16597272 { \insrsid14295470 The Applicant seeks in this application to st rike out the head suit filed by the respondents. In the alternative the applicant seeks an order declaring the respondents as representing nobody as plaintiffs in this suit. The applicant further seeks costs of the head suit from the respondents. This app lication is made under Section 98 of the Civil Procedure Act. It is supported by an affidavit of a one Albert Byamugisha.}{\insrsid2426498 }{\b\ul\insrsid2426498\charrsid2426498 \par {\listtext\pard\plain\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2426498 \hich\af0\dbch\af0\loch\f0 2.\tab}}{\insrsid2426498 Two grounds are advanced in support of this application. Firstly, it is contended that no permission was sought }{\insrsid4656572 by }{ \insrsid2426498 the respondents or granted by the court for the plaintiffs to sue on behalf of the persons who appear on annexture \lquote B\rquote to the plaint. Secondly that the court did not give and has
not published notice of the institution of }{ \insrsid4656572 the }{\insrsid2426498 suit to the said persons either by personal service or public advertisement.}{\b\ul\insrsid14295470\charrsid2426498 \par {\listtext\pard\plain\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2426498 \hich\af0\dbch\af0\loch\f0 3.\tab}}{\insrsid2426498 This application is opposed by the respondents. An affidavit sworn by Mr. Mulema Mukasa, an Advocate, was filed in support of the respondents}{\insrsid4656572 \rquote }{\insrsid2426498 position. The affidavit provides ample proof }{\insrsid4656572 of }{ \insrsid2426498 both the permission of the court granted to }{\insrsid4656572 the }{\insrsid2426498 respondents to bring this action in a representative capacity and the publication by the court of the notice to the persons on whose behalf this suit was brought in the Monitor Newspaper of 30}{\super\insrsid2426498\charrsid2426498 th}{\insrsid2426498 March 2005.}{\b\ul\insrsid2426498\charrsid2426498 \par {\listtext\pard\plain\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid658720 \hich\af0\dbch\af0\loch\f0 4.\tab}}{\insrsid658720 Dr. Byamugisha}{\insrsid4656572 ,}{\insrsid658720 learned counsel for the applicant}{\insrsid4656572 ,}{\insrsid658720 submitted that this suit was brought in contravention of Order 1 Rule 8 of the Civil Procedure Rules since court had granted permission for an action to be brought on behalf of
2500 people and the list published had 2838 people. Mr. Muwema, le arned counsel for the respondents, submitted that the discrepancy in figures did not contravene any provisions of the law. The basis of the permission is not the exact number of the group of persons on whose behalf the action is brought but the common int erest between all of them.}{\b\ul\insrsid2426498\charrsid658720 \par {\listtext\pard\plain\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid658720 \hich\af0\dbch\af0\loch\f0 5.\tab}}{\insrsid658720 Representative actions are instituted to avoid a multiplicity of legal proceedings over the same subject matter where there are numerous individuals having interest in the same subject matter. The community or group on who behalf the action is brought does not have to be ascertained by exact figures as it is possible to bring an action on behalf of a }{\insrsid4656572 fluctuating}{\insrsid658720 group or community of individuals as Mr. Muwema pointed out. The discrepancy in the figures given in the court order and in the notice published in the media is not fatal to the representative action.}{\b\ul\insrsid658720\charrsid2426498 \par {\listtext\pard\plain\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2426498 \hich\af0\dbch\af0\loch\f0 6.\tab}}{\insrsid2426498 I am satisfied that this ap}{\insrsid16597272 plication is without merit. It }{\insrsid2426498 is dismissed accordingly with
costs to the respondents.}{\b\ul\insrsid16597272 \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid16597272 {\insrsid16597272 \par }{\insrsid16597272\charrsid16597272 Dated at Kampala this 4}{\super\insrsid16597272\charrsid16597272 th}{\insrsid16597272\charrsid16597272 day of May 2005 \par \par \par \par \par FMS Egonda-Ntende \par Judge \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\insrsid4594768 \par }}
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.