Download

Uganda Judgment

High Court of Uganda

Rwot Luwum Bishop v Board of Governors, Kitgum Core Primary Teachers' College, Kitgum District Land Board, Komakech William (Civil Suit 15 of 2020) [2023] UGHC 207 (20 September 2023)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The Court determined that, given the willingness of the parties to continue with mediation and the involvement of the Attorney General and Ministry of Education and Sports, the mediation process should be allowed to proceed. However, the process must not be indefinite or non-responsive; it must adhere to the timelines and requirements set out in the Judicature (Mediation) Rules SI 10/2013 and Civil Procedure (Amendment) Rules, SI No. 33/2019. The Court ordered that mediation continue until a fixed date, by which the appointed mediator must report on the status or outcome, ensuring accountability and progress in the resolution of the land ownership and trespass dispute.

Court disposition

mediation_proceedings_to_continue_with_report_due

Orders

  • The mediation proceedings shall continue until the 24th October, 2023.
  • The appointed mediator Bishop Kitara Wilson shall report on the status and/or outcome of the mediation process on the 24th October, 2023 at 09:00 am.
  • Each party shall bear its own costs.

02

Material facts

Parties

Rwot Luwum Bishop & 83 Others

Plaintiff Counsel: Owor Abuga

Board of Governors, Kitgum Core Primary Teachers' College

Defendant Counsel: Okello Oryem

Kitgum District Land Board

Defendant Counsel: Louis Odongo

Komakech William

Defendant Counsel: Okello Oryem

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Civil Suit / Mediation Continuation Ruling

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
Counsel for the 1st and 3rd Defendants, Mr. Okello Oryem, submitted that mediation commenced at Kitgum Core Primary Teachers' College and was ongoing at the Ministry of Education and Sports, with the Attorney General's Chambers involved. He requested that mediation be allowed to continue and the matter adjourned until the Court fixes a date for an update from the Attorney General or a report from the mediator. The Plaintiffs' counsel and the 2nd Defendant's counsel had no objection to this prayer.
Respondent
Counsel for the Plaintiffs and the 2nd Defendant did not object to the continuation of the mediation process and agreed to the proposal for the mediator to report on the outcome at a future date. Both parties expressed willingness to exhaust the mediation process.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Judicature (Mediation) Rules SI 10/2013; Civil Procedure (Amendment) Rules, SI No. 33/2019

    Mediation proceedings must be conducted within the timelines and formalities prescribed by law, maintaining confidentiality and voluntariness.

  2. 02

    Civil Appeal No. 110/2018: Odong Jackson Vs. Odongkara Joe; Miscellaneous Application No. 150/2020: Carlton Douglas Kasirve Vs. Sheena Ahumuza Bageine; Miscellaneous Application No. 448/2016: Okello Okidi Simmons Vs. Acacia Finance Ltd; Miscellaneous Application No. 243/2009: Betuco (U) Ltd & Anor Vs. Barclays Bank Uganda Ltd & 3 Others

    Court-referred mediation should be time-bound and responsive, with feedback provided to the referring court.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The Court determined that, given the willingness of the parties to continue with mediation and the involvement of the Attorney General and Ministry of Education and Sports, the mediation process should be allowed to proceed. However, the process must not be indefinite or non-responsive; it must adhere to the timelines and requirements set out in the Judicature (Mediation) Rules SI 10/2013 and Civil Procedure (Amendment) Rules, SI No. 33/2019. The Court ordered that mediation continue until a fixed date, by which the appointed mediator must report on the status or outcome, ensuring accountability and progress in the resolution of the land ownership and trespass dispute.

Obiter and limits

  • Mediation is confidential and voluntary, but must be conducted within the framework of the law and with timely feedback to the Court.
  • The involvement of the Attorney General and Ministry of Education and Sports is essential for the effective conduct of mediation in this matter.

Court disposition

mediation_proceedings_to_continue_with_report_due

  • The mediation proceedings shall continue until the 24th October, 2023.
  • The appointed mediator Bishop Kitara Wilson shall report on the status and/or outcome of the mediation process on the 24th October, 2023 at 09:00 am.
  • Each party shall bear its own costs.

Source and reliance status

High Court of Uganda

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Source document

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

High Court of Uganda

Judgment

[2023] UGHC 207

THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UGANDA HOLDEN AT GULU

CIVIL SUIT No. 015/2020

RWOT LUWUM BISHOP & 83 OTHERS

PLAINTIFFS

*Versus*

- 1. BOARD OF GOVERNORS, KITGUM CORE PRIMARY TEACHERS' COLLEGE - 2. KITGUM DISTRICT LAND BOARD - 3. KOMAKECH WILLIAM

$\mathsf{S}$

DEFENDANTS

BEFORE HON. MR. JUSTICE PHILIP W. MWAKA.

RULING.

This Ruling arises from the proceedings of the Court on the 20<sup>th</sup> September, 2023 in which the Plaintiffs and Defendants, through their Counsel, briefed Court on ongoing Mediation Proceedings and prayed that the Mediation proceedings are allowed to continue - until a day to be fixed by the Court when the Mediator would submit his Report on the outcome of the Mediation. The suit and counter claim are in respect of ownership of land as well as allegations and cross allegations of trespass.

As far as can be discerned from the Court record, the Mediation was directed by the Hon. Justice Alex Mackay Ajiji the Presiding Judge at the time with Bishop Kitara Wilson being appointed as the Mediator on the 28<sup>th</sup> June, 2022. The matter was adjourned for a report from the Mediator to be submitted on record on the 17<sup>th</sup> August, 2022. The matter was in Court on Two (2) other dates in which it was adjourned enable continuation of the Mediation process.

There are, however, no Case/Mediation Summaries on the Court File. See: The

Judicature (Mediation) Rules SI 10/2013 which replaced The Judicature 25 (Commercial Court Division) (Mediation) Rules, SI No. 55/2007).

1 | Page

PWM

Representation.

The Plaintiff was represented by Counsel Mr. Owor Abuga. The 1<sup>st</sup> and 3<sup>rd</sup> Defendants were represented by Counsel Mr. Okello Oryem. The 2<sup>nd</sup> Defendant was represented by Counsel Mr. Louis Odongo. The 1<sup>st</sup> and 2<sup>nd</sup> Plaintiffs were present in Court. The 1<sup>st</sup> Defendant was represented in Court by Mr. Charles Olara Ocitti, a Member of its Board.

<u>Proceedings of the Court.</u>

At the proceedings, Counsel, Mr. Okello Oryem informed the Court that he was aware that the Mediation commenced at Kitgum Core Primary Teachers' College and was being done at the level of the Ministry of Education and Sports. The Attorney General's Chambers were involved and participated in the Mediation proceedings, as Co – Counsel for the 1<sup>st</sup> Defendant.

Both Mr. Okello Oryem, as Counsel for the 1<sup>st</sup> and 3<sup>rd</sup> Defendants, and Mr. Owor Abuga, as Counsel for the Plaintiffs, informed Court that they were not involved in the Mediation proceedings and were unaware of the outcome.

Mr. Okello Oryem prayed that the Mediation proceedings are allowed to continue and that the matter is adjourned until such a time as the Court shall fix for an update from the Office of the Attorney General as Co - Counsel representing the 1st Defendant and, or a report is submitted by the Mediator Bishop Kitara Wilson on the outcome of the Mediation proceedings. Both Mr. Owor Abuga and Mr. Louis Odongo had no objection.

Decision of the Court.

Having considered the prayer and submissions of Counsel, the willingness of the parties to continue with the Mediation process and the circumstances of this suit, the Court is of the considered view that the parties to the Mediation proceedings being conducted by Bishop Kitara Wilson should exhaust the process with the involvement of the Attorney General and the Ministry of Education and Sports.

qual

The Court is alive to the timelines for the Mediation process, the requirement for formalities and the confidential as well as voluntary nature of the Mediation process 55 under <u>The Judicature (Mediation) Rules SI 10/2013 and the Civil Procedure</u> (Amendment) Rules, SI No. 33/2019. See: Civil Appeal No. 110/2018: Odong Jackson Vs. Odongkara Joe (High Court, Gulu - Hon. Justice Stephen Mubiru), Miscellaneous Application No. 150/2020: Carlton Douglas Kasirve

- Vs. Sheena Ahumuza Bageine (Hon. Justice Boniface Wamala), 60 Miscellaneous Application No. 448/2016: Okello Okidi Simmons Vs. Acacia Finance Ltd (Hon. Justice Christopher Madrama Izama), Miscellaneous Application No. 243/2009: Betuco (U) Ltd & Anor Vs. Barclays Bank Uganda Ltd & 3 Others (Hon. Justice Lameck Mukasa). - Much as the parties have expressed their willingness to exhaust the Mediation 65 process; the Mediation process cannot, however, be endless let alone non-responsive in terms of feedback to the Court which referred the matter to Mediation in the first place.

In the circumstances therefore and in the interests of justice, the Court hereby orders that the Mediation proceedings continue until the 24<sup>th</sup> October, 2023 when the 70 appointed Mediator Bishop Kitara Wilson shall report on the status and, or outcome of the Mediation.

Orders of the Court.

Accordingly, the Court makes the following Orders: -

- $75$ - 1. The Mediation proceedings shall continue until the 24<sup>th</sup> October, 2023. - 2. The appointed Mediator Bishop Kitara Wilson shall report on the status and, or outcome of the Mediation process on the 24<sup>th</sup> October, 2023 at 09:00 am. - 3. Each party shall bear its own costs. - It is so Ordered. 80

3 | Page

Signed, Dated and Delivered at the High Court, Gulu on the 20<sup>th</sup> day of September, 2023.

Philip W. Mwaka

Acting Judge of the High Court. 85

In Attendance.

Ruling delivered on the 20<sup>th</sup> day of September, 2023 in the presence of: -

1. Mr. Owor Abuga, Counsel for the Plaintiffs.

2. Mr. Okello Oryem, Counsel for the 1<sup>st</sup> and 3<sup>rd</sup> Defendants.

3. Mr. Louis Odongo, Counsel for the 2<sup>nd</sup> Defendant.

4. The 1<sup>st</sup> and 2<sup>nd</sup> Plaintiffs present in Court.

5. The 1<sup>st</sup> Defendant was represented in Court by Mr. Charles Olara Ocitti, a Member of its Board.

Philip W. Mwaka

Acting Judge of the High Court.

20<sup>th</sup> day of September, 2023.

RUM

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Civil Appeal No. 110/2018: Odong Jackson Vs. Odongkara Joe

Case cited

Miscellaneous Application No. 150/2020: Carlton Douglas Kasirve Vs. Sheena Ahumuza Bageine

Case cited

Miscellaneous Application No. 448/2016: Okello Okidi Simmons Vs. Acacia Finance Ltd

Case cited

Miscellaneous Application No. 243/2009: Betuco (U) Ltd & Anor Vs. Barclays Bank Uganda Ltd & 3 Others

Case cited

Judicature (Mediation) Rules SI 10/2013

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Civil Procedure (Amendment) Rules, SI No. 33/2019

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this JurisAssist collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.