Download

Uganda Judgment

African Commission on Human and Peoples Rights

Republic of Djibouti v State of Eritrea (Communication 478/14) [2022] ACHPR 10 (9 March 2022)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The African Commission determined that there was no objection to the applicant state's request for withdrawal and that such withdrawal is permissible under Rule 124 of its Rules of Procedure (2020) and its established practice. The Commission found that the request was properly communicated and that both parties were duly informed. In the absence of any overriding public interest or objection, the Commission granted the withdrawal and declared the communication closed.

Court disposition

communication withdrawn and closed

Orders

  • The request for withdrawal of the communication by the Republic of Djibouti is granted.
  • The communication is declared closed.

02

Material facts

Parties

Republic of Djibouti

Applicant

State of Eritrea

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Public International Law Application / Withdrawal Decision

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
Djibouti requested withdrawal of its communication at the merits stage, citing recent developments in bilateral relations with Eritrea. The request was formally communicated to the Commission via Note Verbale.
Respondent
Eritrea welcomed the withdrawal request, reiterated its previous requests for discontinuation and closure of the matter, and referenced the Commission's Information Sheet No. 3, which allows withdrawal at any stage.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Rule 124 of the African Commission's Rules of Procedure (2020); Information Sheet No. 3

    The author of a communication may withdraw it at any stage of the proceedings before the Commission.

  2. 02

    Established practice and jurisprudence of the African Commission

    The Commission may close a communication upon withdrawal by the author, provided there is no objection or overriding public interest.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The African Commission determined that there was no objection to the applicant state's request for withdrawal and that such withdrawal is permissible under Rule 124 of its Rules of Procedure (2020) and its established practice. The Commission found that the request was properly communicated and that both parties were duly informed. In the absence of any overriding public interest or objection, the Commission granted the withdrawal and declared the communication closed.

Obiter and limits

  • The Commission notes that amicable settlement efforts were made but did not result in agreement due to lack of response from the respondent state.
  • The Commission reiterates that withdrawal of a communication is a right of the author and may be exercised at any stage, as per its procedural rules.

Court disposition

communication withdrawn and closed

  • The request for withdrawal of the communication by the Republic of Djibouti is granted.
  • The communication is declared closed.

Source and reliance status

African Commission on Human and Peoples Rights

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Source document

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

African Commission on Human and Peoples Rights

Judgment

[2022] ACHPR 10

*Rights*

*African Commission on Human & Peoples'*

AFRICAN UNION UNION AFRICAINE

UNIÃO AFRICANA

Commission Africaine des Droits de l'Homme & des Peuples

*31 Bijilo Annex Layout, Kombo North District, Western Region, P. O. Box 673, Banjul, The Gambia; Tel: (220) 4410505 / 4410506; Cell-phone (+220) 2304361; E-mail: [au-banjul@africa-union.org](mailto:au-banjul@africa-union.org); Web [www.achpr.org](http://www.achpr.org)*

Decision of the African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights on Withdrawal

Communication 478/14: The Republic of Djibouti v. The State of Eritrea

Summary of the Complaint:

- 1. The Secretariat of the African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights (the Secretariat), received a complaint presented on behalf of the Republic of Djibouti (hereinafter referred to as Djibouti) pursuant to Article 49 ofthe African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights (the African Charter). - 2. The Complaint is submitted against the State of Eritrea (hereinafter referred to as Eritrea). - 3. Djibouti (the Complainant State) alleges that Eritrea (the Respondent State) is violating provisions of the African Charter, as well as relevant provisions of international law, by its continuous detention since June 2008 of 19 "war prisoners," now seventeen (17) as 2 have successfully evaded captivity in September 2011 and have arrived in Djibouti through Sudan. - 4. Djibouti submits that in February 2008, Eritrean troops entered into Djiboutian territory withoutwarning and seized Ras Doumeira and Doumeira Island. A military confrontation initiated by Eritrea on 10 June 2008, the Complainant State alleges that thirty (30) Djiboutian soldiers were killed, one hundred and nineteen (119) were wounded and a furthernineteen (19) Djiboutian military personnel, including one officer,were reported missing in action. - 5. Djibouti alleges that, seven (7) of the missing soldiers are confirmed tohave been taken by Eritrea as prisoners of war, and that the remaining twelve (12) are presumed to have also been taken by Eritrea as prisoners of war.

6. Djibouti avers that since the capture of nineteen (19) members of its military personnel by Eritrea, the Respondent State has continuously denied having them in her custody until two of the captives escaped and revealed what exactly happened starting from the date of their arrest.

Procedure and Application for Withdrawal

- 7. The Secretariat received from a Note Verbale from the Minister of Foreign Affairs and InternationalCooperation of the Republic of Djibouti, dated 03 May 2014, presented on behalf of Djibouti pursuant to Article 49 of the African Charter. - 8. The African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights (the African Commission) seized the Communication during its 17 th Extra-Ordinary Session, held from 19 to 28 February 2015. - 9. The Commission adopted a decision on Admissibility at its 25 th Extra- Ordinary Session held from 19 February to 05 March 2019. The Commission also informed the parties that it was offering its good offices, with a view to an amicable settlement being reached between them in accordance with Rule 90(1) of its Rules of Procedure (2010). - 10. Whilst Djibouti agreed to the offer for amicable settlement, which (agreement) was transmitted to the Respondent State on 10 April 2019 for its consideration, the latter failed toaccept nor respond tothe offer ofamicable settlement within the stipulated timeline, following which the offer lapsed on 28 June 2019, and the Commission decided to proceed with the Communication on the Merits in accordance with Rules 91 and 92 of its Rules of Procedure (2010). Accordingly, the Complainant State was requested to submit arguments on the Merits of the Communication in accordance with Rule 91(1) of the Commission's Rules of

Procedure (2010). - 11. Djibouti failed tosubmit on the Merits within the stipulated timeline, which expired. However, the Respondent State's submissions on the Merits were received, thereby extending the process for exchange of pleadings between the parties, and the same were transmitted to Djibouti on 19 April 2021, requesting its response to Eritrea's Merits thereto, failing which the Commission would proceed to adopt a decision on the Merits based on information at its disposal, including those contained in the initial Complaint which touch on the Merits of the Communication. - 12. By Note Verbale, reference No. 81/56/21/MN/DAJC/MAECI and dated 24 May 2021, received by the Secretariat of the Commission from Djibouti, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and InternationalCooperation of the Republic of Djibouti stated the following:

"*In light of recent developments in bilateral relations between the two States, the Ministry hereby informs the African Commission on Human and Peoples'Rights by Note Verbale, forwarded through its Ambassador in Washington and addressed to Ms. Lindiwe Khumalo, Executive Secretary a.i., of Djibouti's decision to withdraw its Communication, which is currently at the Merits stage*."

- 13. On 18 June 2021,the Secretariat acknowledged receipt of the Note Verbale. - 14. By Notes Verbale dated 15 December 2021, the Parties were informed, *inter alia,* that the Commission was in receipt of the request for withdrawal of the Communication by Djibouti and that the same would be duly considered by the Commission. - 15. By Note Verbale dated 23 December 2021, the Respondent State welcomed the request for withdrawal of the Communication by Djibouti, and recalled its previous requests for the discontinuation and closure of the matter, as well as the Commission's Information Sheet No. 3,which indicates that "[t]he author of a Communication can withdraw his or her Communication at any stage."

Analysis of the African Commission

16. The Commission sees no objection in granting this request.

Decision of the African Commission

- 17. The Commission decides to grant the request for withdrawal, in line with its established practice and jurisprudence, and in accordance with Rule 124 of its Rules of Procedure (2020). - 18. Based on the above, the Commission declares the Communication closed.

Done in Banjul,The Gambia, during the 70 th Ordinary Session, held from 23 February to 09 March 2022

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Rule 124 of the African Commission's Rules of Procedure (2020)

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this JurisAssist collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.