Uganda v Ntirubabarira Silver alias Hami
Uganda v Ntirubabarira Silver alias Hami (Criminal Session No. 0008 of 2023) [2025] UGHC 345 (7 January 2025)
__CONTENT_FILTERED__
Source excerpt
- Content Filtered
Uganda Source-linked decisions Coverage checked
Uganda Case Law
Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
- Courts on this page
- 6 court collections
- Last checked
Search and filter Uganda case law
Results update automatically as you type.
Uganda decisions
Source-linked decisions currently available to browse
Lukaaga v Nabirinzi & 2 Others (Company Application 36863 of 2024)
Lukaaga v Nabirinzi & 2 Others (Company Application 36863 of 2024) [2025] UGRSB 2 (6 January 2025)
The court found that the transfer of two shares from Rosemary Mullo to Billy Cosmas Mullo was procedurally defective due to the absence of a board resolution, as required by Article 11 of the company's Articles of Association. Consequently, the transfer form for these two shares must be expunged, and the shares transmitted to the applicant as the personal representative of the deceased. However, the transfer of eighteen shares was supported by a valid resolution and transfer form, and the applicant failed to discharge the burden of proof that this transfer was fraudulent or irregular. The cou…
Source excerpt
- Share Transfer Procedure
- Rectification Of Register
- Company Membership Disputes
- Succession Of Shares
Kasajja v HRP Services Limited & 5 Others (Company Application 39785 of 2024)
Kasajja v HRP Services Limited & 5 Others (Company Application 39785 of 2024) [2025] UGRSB 1 (6 January 2025)
The applicant failed to demonstrate sufficient and direct interest in the affairs of the 1st Respondent Company as required for locus standi under Regulation 20(f) of the Companies (Powers of the Registrar) Regulations, 2016. The applicant is neither a member nor a subscriber to the company and does not have a legitimate legal right affected by the company’s internal affairs or director appointments. The Registrar of Companies will not intervene in matters that can be resolved internally by the company, especially where the applicant’s interest is not actual, direct, or current. The absence o…
Source excerpt
- Locus Standi
- Company Directors Appointment
- Shareholder Rights
- Company Documents Rectification
Obeke and Another v Katushabe
Obeke and Another v Katushabe (Civil Suit 517 of 2020) [2025] UGHCLD 1 (6 January 2025)
The High Court found the plaintiffs failed to prove ownership of the kibanja, held the defendant was the lawful owner, and granted damages and injunction for trespass.
- Ownership Dispute
- Trespass To Land
- Burden Of Proof
- Admissibility Of Evidence
- Land-ownership-dispute
- Trespass-to-land
Kato Henry v Uganda
Kato Henry v Uganda (Criminal Miscellaneous Application 96 of 2025) [2025] UGHCCRD 21 (5 January 2025)
The High Court granted Kato Henry mandatory bail after finding he had been remanded for over six months without committal, and imposed cash and surety conditions.
- Mandatory Bail
- Remand Periods
- Aggravated Defilement
- Constitutional Rights
- Committal Procedure
- Mandatory-bail
Uganda Moslem Supreme Council v Yudaya & 2 Others & Ssewante v Yudaya & 3 Others
Uganda Moslem Supreme Council v Yudaya & 2 Others & Ssewante v Yudaya & 3 Others (Miscellaneous Application 536 of 2024; Miscellaneous Application 541 of 2024; Miscellaneous Application 549 of 2024) [2025] UGHCCD 2 (3 January 2025)
The High Court determined that it had jurisdiction to hear and determine the consolidated applications, including the application for review. However, the existence of a valid arbitration clause in article 28 of the UMSC constitution, which mandates that disputes concerning the management and affairs of the UMSC be resolved by the Muslim Arbitration and Conciliation Council (MAC), was not considered in the original judgment. This omission constituted an error apparent on the face of the record. The court found that the parties should have been referred to the MAC for resolution of their dispu…
Source excerpt
- Review Of Judgment
- Arbitration Clauses
- Company Winding Up
- Religious Organization Governance
- Contempt Of Court
- Joinder Of Parties
Kyaligonza v Mugabe and Others (MISC. CIVIL APPEAL NO. 07 OF 2022)
Kyaligonza v Mugabe and Others (MISC. CIVIL APPEAL NO. 07 OF 2022) [2025] UGHC 238 (3 January 2025)
The Assistant Registrar lacked jurisdiction to entertain and grant the main application for stay of execution of a decree passed by a judge, as such authority is reserved for the judge who delivered the judgment under O.43 r.4(2) CPR. The ruling and orders issued by the Registrar in Misc. Application No.53 of 2020 are null and void and must be set aside. There is no evidence of a pending appeal against the decision in HCCS No.28 of 2009, as the notice of appeal was filed out of time and no memorandum of appeal was lodged. The application was not proven to have been served out of time, as the…
Source excerpt
- Jurisdiction Of Registrar
- Stay Of Execution
- Service Of Process
- Appeal Timelines
Muhangi & Another v Ssekubwa
Muhangi & Another v Ssekubwa (Civil Appeal 42 of 2022) [2025] UGHCCD 1 (2 January 2025)
The High Court allowed a civil appeal, set aside an order releasing a disputed vehicle, and held the appellants’ custody was lawful as estate administrators.
- Letters Of Administration
- Pleadings Consistency
- Interlocutory Orders
- Sale Of Goods
- Estate Administration
- Letters-of-administration
Osinya Zedex and Another v Ouma Francis Hasindi and Another (LD Civil Appeal No. 0009 of 2024)
Osinya Zedex and Another v Ouma Francis Hasindi and Another (LD Civil Appeal No. 0009 of 2024) [2025] UGHC 427 (1 January 2025)
The High Court dismissed a land appeal, upholding findings that the respondents failed to prove ownership and that the suit was time barred.
- Land Ownership Disputes
- Limitation Of Actions
- Trespass To Land
- Burden Of Proof
- Land-ownership-disputes
- Limitation-of-actions
Gasasira v Bataringaya
Gasasira v Bataringaya (Civil Application 68 of 2025) [2025] UGCA 94 (1 January 2025)
The Court of Appeal found that the application for stay of execution was properly before it, as the High Court had imposed harsh and unconscionable conditions for stay, effectively denying the applicant relief and threatening to render the pending appeal nugatory. The applicant satisfied all four conditions for grant of stay: a valid notice of appeal was filed and served; the appeal raised arguable questions of law and fact, not being frivolous; there was an imminent threat of execution that could result in irreparable loss and render the appeal nugatory; and the application was filed promptl…
Source excerpt
- Stay Of Execution
- Appeal Rights
- Security For Due Performance
- Balance Of Convenience
- Res Judicata
- Contempt Of Court