Share
Opio v Uganda (Criminal Miscellaneous Application 184 of 2024) [2024] UGHCCRD 49 (6 June 2024)
- Citation
- [2024] UGHCCRD 49
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Uganda
- Court
- HC: Criminal Division (Uganda)
- Panel
- Elubu, J
- Case number
- Criminal Miscellaneous Application 184 of 2024
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- HC: Criminal Division (Uganda)
- Panel
- Elubu, J
- Case number
- Criminal Miscellaneous Application 184 of 2024
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The applicant, having been charged with murder, is subject to the provisions of Article 23(6)(c) of the Constitution, which mandates bail for persons on remand for 180 days before committal to the High Court. However, the court established that the applicant was committed to the High Court for trial on 14th June 2023. The constitutional and statutory provisions for mandatory bail do not apply once committal has occurred. Therefore, the applicant does not qualify for mandatory bail, and the application must be dismissed.
Court disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- The application for mandatory bail is dismissed.
02
Material facts
Parties
Opio Bosco
ApplicantUganda
Respondent03
Procedural history
Posture
Criminal Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Mandatory Bail
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the applicant is entitled to mandatory bail under Article 23(6)(c) of the Constitution given his committal status.
- 02
Whether the period spent on remand prior to committal qualifies the applicant for mandatory release on bail.
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The applicant argued that he has been charged with murder and has spent one year and six months on remand without committal, thus qualifying for mandatory bail under Article 23(6)(c) of the Constitution and the relevant statutory provisions.
- Respondent
- The respondent contended, and the court confirmed, that the applicant has already been committed to the High Court for trial, and therefore does not qualify for mandatory bail under Article 23(6)(c) of the Constitution.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Article 23(6)(c) of the Constitution of Uganda
Mandatory bail under Article 23(6)(c) of the Constitution applies only to persons charged with offences triable by the High Court who have been on remand for 180 days before committal.
- 02
Clause 10(1) and 10(3) of The Constitution (Bail Guidelines for Courts of Judicature) (Practice) Directions 2022
Mandatory release on bail for offences triable by the High Court shall be granted only by the High Court, and only if the accused has not yet been committed for trial.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The applicant, having been charged with murder, is subject to the provisions of Article 23(6)(c) of the Constitution, which mandates bail for persons on remand for 180 days before committal to the High Court. However, the court established that the applicant was committed to the High Court for trial on 14th June 2023. The constitutional and statutory provisions for mandatory bail do not apply once committal has occurred. Therefore, the applicant does not qualify for mandatory bail, and the application must be dismissed.
Obiter and limits
- The provisions for mandatory bail are couched in mandatory terms but are strictly limited to the period before committal to the High Court.
- The High Court alone has jurisdiction to grant mandatory bail in such cases.
Court disposition
application dismissed
- The application for mandatory bail is dismissed.
Source and reliance status
HC: Criminal Division (Uganda)
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
HC: Criminal Division (Uganda)
Judgment
THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA IN THE HIGH COURT OF UGANDA AT KAMPALA
CRIMINAL MISC. APPL. No. 184 of 2024 (High Court Session Case No. 268 OF 2023)
OPIO BOSCO
APPLICANT $\cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots$
Versus
UGANDA
RESPONDENT $\cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots \cdots$
BEFORE: HON. MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ELUBU RULING
This application is commenced under Articles 23 (6) (a) and 28 (3) (a) of the Constitution of the Republic of Uganda; Sections 14 (1) and 15 (1) (b) of the Trial on Indictments Act; and Clause 10 (1) of The Constitution (Bail Guidelines for Courts of Judicature) (Practice) Directions 2022
The applicant, Opio Bosco, seeks an order that he be released on mandatory bail.
The grounds on which the application is based are set out in the Notice of Motion and elaborated in affidavit sworn by the applicant.
He states that he was charged with the offence of Murder contrary to Sections 188 and 189 of the Penal Code Act and as of March 2024 he had spent one year and six months on remand. That he has been in detention on remand without committal. On this basis the applicant seeks a mandatory release on bail.
It has however been established from the court case management information system that the applicant was committed to the High Court and his High Court Session Case No. 287 of 2023.
Determination
This application is made on the premise that the applicant qualifies for mandatory bail. Because the applicant was charged with the offence of Murder c/s 188 and 189 of The PCA, which is only triable by the High Court, then the relevant provision of the Constitution is Article 23 (6) (c) which states that,
Where a person is arrested in respect of a criminal offence in the case of an offence triable only by the High Court, if that person has been remanded in custody for one hundred and eighty days before the case is committed to the High Court, that person shall be released on bail on such conditions as the court considers reasonable.
Clause 10 (1) of The Constitution (Bail Guidelines for Courts of Judicature) (Practice) Directions 2022 reproduces the above article of the constitution.
This Court notes that the provisions are couched in mandatory terms.
The procedural provision is Clause 10 (3) of the above Guidelines which stipulates,
For the avoidance of doubt, mandatory release on bail for offences triable by the High Court under Article 23 (6) (c) of the Constitution shall be granted only by the High Court.
I have perused the court record and checked with the court case database, and established that indeed, the applicant has been committed to the high court for his
trial. The matter was entered in the court database as No 287 of 2023. The entry shows that the applicant was committed to the High Court on the 14<sup>th</sup> of June 2023. For release under Article 23 (6) (c) of the Constitution to be effected, the applicant should not have been committed to the High Court for trial. In view of the fact that he has now been committed, then he does not qualify for mandatory release on bail. For that reason, this application must fail and is dismissed.
Michael Elubu Judge 06.06.2024
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.