Share
Omo Simon v Amon Tomusange (Civil Suit No 201 of 2004) (Civil Suit No 201 of 2004) [2004] UGHC 3 (31 December 2004)
- Citation
- [2004] UGHC 3
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Uganda
- Court
- High Court of Uganda
- Posture
- Civil Suit / Ruling on Application to Strike Out Defence
- Case number
- Civil Suit No 201 of 2004
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- High Court of Uganda
- Posture
- Civil Suit / Ruling on Application to Strike Out Defence
- Case number
- Civil Suit No 201 of 2004
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The court held that, although the defendant's written statement of defence was filed out of time and without leave, justice required that the defendant be allowed to defend the suit. The court cited authority that procedural errors should not automatically bar a party from being heard, especially where the defence has merit and the plaintiff can be compensated by costs. The nature of the action, the merits of the defence, and the ability to compensate the plaintiff for delay were all considered. Denying a party a hearing should be a last resort. Accordingly, the defendant was permitted to defend the suit, but the plaintiff was awarded fixed costs to compensate for the procedural delay.
Court disposition
Defendant allowed to defend the suit; costs awarded to plaintiff.
Orders
- Defendant is permitted to defend the suit.
- Plaintiff is awarded fixed costs of Shs. 200,000/= in any event.
02
Material facts
Parties
Omo Simon
PlaintiffAmon Tomusange
DefendantAmounts and remedies
- Costs Awarded to Plaintiff: UGX 200,000
03
Procedural history
Posture
Civil Suit / Ruling on Application to Strike Out Defence
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the defendant's written statement of defence should be struck out for being filed out of time and without leave of court.
- 02
Whether the defendant should be allowed to defend the suit despite procedural default.
- 03
What is the appropriate remedy for the plaintiff in light of the procedural irregularities.
Party arguments
- Applicant
- Counsel for the plaintiff argued that the defendant's written statement of defence was filed out of time and without leave or consent of court, and therefore should be struck off. The plaintiff had already obtained an interlocutory judgment and sought to have the defence removed to proceed with the suit.
- Respondent
- Counsel for the defendant applied to be discharged from the suit, stating that he had not been able to contact the defendant since drafting the defence. The defendant's position was not directly argued, but the court considered whether justice required allowing the defence to stand.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Petro Kasule v Daniel S S Kato (CA 13/51) [1952-1956] VII 4 LR
Courts should be slow to shut out a defendant who, though in default, has shown a defence and seeks to defend, unless doing so would cause injustice to the other party.
- 02
Cropper v Smith [1884] 26 Ch. Div. 710
Errors or mistakes in procedure, if not fraudulent or intended to overreach, should be corrected if it can be done without injustice.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The court held that, although the defendant's written statement of defence was filed out of time and without leave, justice required that the defendant be allowed to defend the suit. The court cited authority that procedural errors should not automatically bar a party from being heard, especially where the defence has merit and the plaintiff can be compensated by costs. The nature of the action, the merits of the defence, and the ability to compensate the plaintiff for delay were all considered. Denying a party a hearing should be a last resort. Accordingly, the defendant was permitted to defend the suit, but the plaintiff was awarded fixed costs to compensate for the procedural delay.
Obiter and limits
- The court emphasized that denying a subject a hearing should be the last resort.
- The plaintiff's failure to press for formal proof after obtaining interlocutory judgment was noted as relevant to the exercise of discretion.
Court disposition
Defendant allowed to defend the suit; costs awarded to plaintiff.
- Defendant is permitted to defend the suit.
- Plaintiff is awarded fixed costs of Shs. 200,000/= in any event.
Source and reliance status
High Court of Uganda
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
High Court of Uganda
Judgment
{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\uc1\deff0\stshfdbch0\stshfloch0\stshfhich0\stshfbi0\deflang1033\deflangfe1033{\fonttbl{\f0\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02020603050405020304}Times New Roman;}{\f38\fswiss\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0604030504040204}Verdana;} {\f273\froman\fcharset238\fprq2 Times New Roman CE;}{\f274\froman\fcharset204\fprq2 Times New Roman Cyr;}{\f276\froman\fcharset161\fprq2 Times New Roman Greek;}{\f277\froman\fcharset162\fprq2 Times New Roman Tur;} {\f278\froman\fcharset177\fprq2 Times New Roman (Hebrew);}{\f279\froman\fcharset178\fprq2 Times New Roman (Arabic);}{\f280\froman\fcharset186\fprq2 Times New Roman Baltic;}{\f281\froman\fcharset163\fprq2 Times New Roman (Vietnamese);} {\f653\fswiss\fcharset238\fprq2 Verdana CE;}{\f654\fswiss\fcharset204\fprq2 Verdana Cyr;}{\f656\fswiss\fcharset161\fprq2 Verdana Greek;}{\f657\fswiss\fcharset162\fprq2 Verdana Tur;}{\f660\fswiss\fcharset186\fprq2 Verdana Baltic;} {\f661\fswiss\fcharset163\fprq2 Verdana (Vietnamese);}}{\colortbl;\red0\green0\blue0;\red0\green0\blue255;\red0\green255\blue255;\red0\green255\blue0;\red255\green0\blue255;\red255\green0\blue0;\red255\green255\blue0;\red255\green255\blue255; \red0\green0\blue128;\red0\green128\blue128;\red0\green128\blue0;\red128\green0\blue128;\red128\green0\blue0;\red128\green128\blue0;\red128\green128\blue128;\red192\green192\blue192;}{\stylesheet{ \ql
\li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs20\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \snext0 Normal;}{\s1\ql \li0\ri0\keepn\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\outlinelevel0\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \b\fs28\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext0 heading 1;}{\s2\qj \li0\ri0\keepn\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\outlinelevel1\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \b\f38\fs20\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext0 heading 2;}{\*\cs10 \additive \ssemihidden Default Paragraph Font;}{\* \ts11\tsrowd\trftsWidthB3\trpaddl108\trpaddr108\trpaddfl3\trpaddft3\trpaddfb3\trpaddfr3\trcbpat1\trcfpat1\tscellwidthfts0\tsvertalt\tsbrdrt\tsbrdrl\tsbrdrb\tsbrdrr\tsbrdrdgl\tsbrdrdgr\tsbrdrh\tsbrdrv \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs20\lang1024\langfe1024\cgrid\langnp1024\langfenp1024 \snext11 \ssemihidden Normal Table;}{\s15\qj \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \f38\fs20\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext15 Body Text;}{\s16\qj \li720\ri864\sl480\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin864\lin720\itap0 \f38\fs26\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext16 Block Text;}{\s17\ql
\li0\ri0\widctlpar\tqc\tx4320\tqr\tx8640\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs20\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext17 footer;}{\*\cs18 \additive \sbasedon10 page number;}}{\*\latentstyles\lsdstimax156\lsdlockeddef0}{\*\rsidtbl \rsid880773\rsid10374226\rsid12549209\rsid13588365\rsid13983540}{\*\generator Microsoft Word 11.0.5604;}{\info{\title THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA}{\author skalisa}{\operator owner} {\creatim\yr2008\mo3\dy25\hr14\min13}{\revtim\yr2008\mo3\dy25\hr14\min13}{\version2}{\edmins2}{\nofpages2}{\nofwords475}{\nofchars2711}{\*\company Courts of Judicature}{\nofcharsws3180}{\vern24689}} \widowctrl\ftnbj\aenddoc\noxlattoyen\expshrtn\noultrlspc\dntblnsbdb\nospaceforul\formshade\horzdoc\dghspace180\dgvspace180\dghorigin1701\dgvorigin1984\dghshow0\dgvshow0 \jexpand\viewkind1\viewscale100\pgbrdrhead\pgbrdrfoot\nolnhtadjtbl\nojkernpunct\rsidroot880773 \fet0{\*\ftnsep \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs20\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 { \insrsid12549209 \chftnsep \par }}{\*\ftnsepc \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs20\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid12549209 \chftnsepc \par }}{\*\aftnsep \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0
\fs20\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid12549209 \chftnsep \par }}{\*\aftnsepc \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs20\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid12549209 \chftnsepc \par }}\sectd \linex0\endnhere\sectdefaultcl\sectrsid880773\sftnbj {\footer \pard\plain \s17\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\tqc\tx4320\tqr\tx8640\pvpara\phmrg\posxc\posy0\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid880773 \fs20\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\field{\*\fldinst {\cs18\insrsid13588365 PAGE }}{\fldrslt {\cs18\lang1024\langfe1024\noproof\insrsid10374226 1}}}{\cs18\insrsid13588365 \par }\pard \s17\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\tqc\tx4320\tqr\tx8640\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\insrsid13588365 \par }}{\*\pnseclvl1\pnucrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl2\pnucltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl3\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl4\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta )}} {\*\pnseclvl5\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl6\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl7\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl8 \pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta
)}}{\*\pnseclvl9\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}\pard\plain \qc \li0\ri0\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid13983540 \fs20\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\fs24\insrsid13588365\charrsid880773 THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA \par IN THE HIGH COURT OF UGANDA HOLDEN AT NAKAWA \par }{\b\fs24\insrsid880773\charrsid880773 CIVIL SUIT NO}{\b\fs24\insrsid13588365\charrsid880773 201 OF 2004 \par }\pard\plain \s1\ql \li0\ri0\sl360\slmult1\keepn\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\outlinelevel0\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid13983540 \b\fs28\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\b0\fs24\insrsid13588365\charrsid880773 OMO SIMON}{ \b0\fs24\insrsid880773 \'85\'85\'85\'85\'85\'85\'85\'85\'85\'85\'85\'85.\'85\'85\'85\'85\'85\'85\'85\'85\'85.}{\b0\fs24\insrsid13588365\charrsid880773 PLAINTIFF \par }\pard\plain \qc \li0\ri0\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid13983540 \fs20\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\fs24\insrsid13588365\charrsid880773 VERSUS \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid13983540 {\fs24\insrsid13588365\charrsid880773 AMON TOMUSANGE}{\fs24\insrsid880773
\'85\'85\'85\'85\'85\'85\'85\'85\'85\'85\'85\'85\'85\'85\'85\'85\'85 ..}{\fs24\insrsid13588365\charrsid880773 DEFENDANT \par }\pard \qj \li0\ri0\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid13983540 {\b\fs24\ul\insrsid13588365\charrsid880773 \par BEFORE HON. JUSTICE GIDEON TINYINONDI: \par \par RULING: \par }{\fs24\insrsid13588365\charrsid880773 \par }\pard\plain \s15\qj \li0\ri0\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid13983540 \f38\fs20\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\f0\fs24\insrsid13588365\charrsid880773 On 23/09/2004 t he Plaintiff filed the present suit seeking special and general damages for wrongful and malicious eviction of him by the Defendant, damages for loss of property and wrongful detention and trespass to his goods. \par }\pard\plain \qj \li0\ri0\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid13983540 \fs20\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\fs24\insrsid13588365\charrsid880773 On 19/10/2004 the Defendant filed a written statement of defence with a counter claim. On 26/11/2004 the Plaintiff/Defendant filed a reply to the written statement of defence and counter claim.}{\fs24\insrsid13983540 \par }{\fs24\insrsid13588365\charrsid880773 On 13/04/2006 the matter came up for hearing. Counsel for the Defendant
}{\fs24\insrsid880773\charrsid880773 applied}{\fs24\insrsid13588365\charrsid880773 to be discharged from the suit because since drafting the written statement of defence he had never again set eyes on the Defendant. Court obliged this application. \par \par }\pard\plain \s15\qj \li0\ri0\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid13983540 \f38\fs20\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\f0\fs24\insrsid13588365\charrsid880773 Thereafter Counsel for the Plaintiff informed court that on 14/10/2004 the Plaintiff obtained an interlocutory judgement. He applied for the Defendant\rquote s written statement of defence struck off on account of it having been filed out of time and without court\rquote s leave or consent by the Plaintiff. I reserved my ruling which I now give. If the Plaintiff had pressed for formal proof following the }{ \f0\fs24\insrsid880773\charrsid880773 Registrar\rquote s}{\f0\fs24\insrsid13588365\charrsid880773 order of 14/10/2004 court would have regarded him as seriously aggrieved and seeking justice. The Plaintiff did not but went ahead to file the said reply.
\par }\pard\plain \qj \li0\ri0\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid13983540 \fs20\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\fs24\insrsid13588365\charrsid880773 \par In the circumstances I will cite the judgment in }{\b\i\fs24\insrsid13588365\charrsid880773 P}{\b\i\fs24\ul\insrsid880773\charrsid880773 etro Kasule Vs Daniel S S Kato: (C A 13/51) [1952 \endash 1956] Vii 4 Lr }{\fs24\insrsid13588365\charrsid880773 where it was stated: \par \par }\pard \qj \li720\ri864\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin864\lin720\itap0\pararsid13983540 {\fs24\insrsid13588365\charrsid880773 \'93 The question should be, I think, given all that, how may justice best be done. Lord Justice Bowen in }{\b\i\fs24\ul\insrsid13588365\charrsid880773 Cropper v. Smith }{\b\fs24\ul\insrsid13588365\charrsid880773 [1884] 26 Ch. Div. At p.}{ \fs24\ul\insrsid13588365\charrsid880773 }{\b\fs24\ul\insrsid13588365\charrsid880773 710}{\b\fs24\insrsid13588365\charrsid880773 }{\fs24\insrsid13588365\charrsid880773 said \'93I know of no kind o f error or mistake which, if not fraudulent or intended to overreach, the Court ought not to correct, if it can be done without injustice to the other party.\'94 and \par }\pard\plain \s16\qj \li720\ri864\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin864\lin720\itap0\pararsid13983540
\f38\fs26\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\f0\fs24\insrsid13588365\charrsid880773 \'93It seems to me that }{\f0\fs24\ul\insrsid13588365\charrsid880773 where a defendant though in default appears}{\f0\fs24\insrsid13588365\charrsid880773 before the Court and indi cates that he has a defence, and shows the Court what that defence is, then if the defence disclosed has merits, and the plaintiff can reasonably be compensated by costs for the delay, it is proper for the Court to take steps to try the case upon the meri ts, both sides being given a hearing. There are a number of English cases which indicate how slow the Court should be to shut out a defendant who, though in default, has shown a defence and seeks to defend.\'94}{\f0\fs24\insrsid880773 }{ \f0\fs24\insrsid13588365\charrsid880773 and}{\f0\fs24\insrsid880773 }{\f0\fs24\insrsid13588365\charrsid880773 \'93In my view that is not the sole matter whic h must be considered in cases of this kind. The nature of the action should be considered, the defence if one has been brought to the notice of the Court, }{\f0\fs24\ul\insrsid13588365\charrsid880773 however irregularly}{ \f0\fs24\insrsid13588365\charrsid880773 , should be considered, the question as to whether the plaintiff can reasonably be compensated by costs for any delay occasioned should be considered, }{\f0\fs24\ul\insrsid13588365\charrsid880773 and
finally}{ \f0\fs24\insrsid13588365\charrsid880773 I think it should always be remembered that to deny the subject a hearing should be the last resort of a Court.\'94[Emphasis is mine] \par }\pard \s16\qc \li720\ri864\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin864\lin720\itap0\pararsid13983540 {\f0\fs24\insrsid13588365\charrsid880773 \par }\pard\plain \qj \li0\ri0\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid13983540 \fs20\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\fs24\insrsid13588365\charrsid880773 In this vein I will allow the Defendant to defend this suit but award costs fixed at Shs. 200,000/= to the Plaintiff in any event. \par \par }\pard\plain \s2\qj \li0\ri0\sl360\slmult1\keepn\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\outlinelevel1\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid13983540 \b\f38\fs20\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\f0\fs24\insrsid13588365\charrsid880773 Sgd:\tab Gideon Tinyinondi \par }\pard\plain \qj \li0\ri0\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid13983540 \fs20\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\fs24\insrsid13588365\charrsid880773 \tab }{ \b\fs24\insrsid13588365\charrsid880773 JUDGE.\tab \tab }{\fs24\insrsid13588365\charrsid880773 \par }}
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.