Share
Nankabirwa and Anor v Uganda (HCT-00-CR-CM 81 of 2020) [2020] UGHCCRD 156 (7 September 2020)
- Citation
- [2020] UGHCCRD 156
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Uganda
- Court
- HC: Criminal Division (Uganda)
- Panel
- Kwesiga, J
- Case number
- HCT-00-CR-CM 81 of 2020
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- HC: Criminal Division (Uganda)
- Panel
- Kwesiga, J
- Case number
- HCT-00-CR-CM 81 of 2020
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The court found that both applicants are of advanced age and suffer from chronic medical conditions that are aggravated by imprisonment. They have a permanent place of abode and have presented substantial, uncontested sureties. The indefinite adjournment of their trial due to COVID-19 restrictions is not attributable to the applicants and cannot be used against them. The inability to provide a speedy and continuous trial is a failure of the judiciary, not the applicants. The court is satisfied that the applicants meet all statutory and constitutional requirements for bail. Therefore, bail pending trial is granted to both applicants on specified terms and conditions, including execution of non-cash bonds and monthly reporting to the Deputy Registrar until the conclusion of the main criminal case.
Court disposition
bail_granted_pending_trial
Orders
- Nankabirwa Jane Kulumba is granted bail and shall execute a non-cash bond of UGX 50,000,000.
- Each of her sureties shall execute a non-cash bond of UGX 50,000,000 per person.
- Nankabirwa Jane Kulumba shall report before the Deputy Registrar, Criminal Division for bail extension once a month from 1st October 2020 until the main criminal trial is concluded.
- Kulumba John is granted bail pending trial and shall execute a non-cash bond of UGX 50,000,000.
- Each of his approved sureties shall execute a non-cash bond of UGX 50,000,000 per person.
- Kulumba John shall report before the Deputy Registrar, Criminal Division for bail extension once a month from 1st October 2020 until disposal of the main criminal case.
02
Material facts
Parties
Nankabirwa Jane
Applicant Counsel: Katende, Ssempebwa & Co. AdvocatesKulumba John
Applicant Counsel: Katende, Ssempebwa & Co. AdvocatesUganda
RespondentAmounts and remedies
- Applicant Bail Bond Amount: UGX 50,000,000
- Surety Bond Amount Per Person: UGX 50,000,000
03
Procedural history
Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Bail Pending Trial
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the applicants are entitled to bail pending trial under Ugandan law.
- 02
Whether the applicants' advanced age and medical conditions justify release on bail.
- 03
Whether the applicants have a permanent place of abode and substantial sureties as required by law.
- 04
Whether the delay in trial due to COVID-19 restrictions affects the applicants' right to bail.
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The applicants, both aged 53, are spouses suffering from diabetes and hypertension, which are aggravated by prison conditions. They have a permanent place of abode and have presented substantial sureties. The trial has been indefinitely adjourned due to COVID-19 restrictions, causing inordinate delay not attributable to them. They seek bail pending trial under Sections 14 and 15 of the Trial on Indictments Act and Articles 23 and 28 of the Constitution.
- Respondent
- The State Attorney argued that the applicants have not proved their illnesses cannot be managed in prison and that the trial has already commenced, only delayed due to the pandemic. The State contends there has been no inordinate delay in prosecution and objects to bail on these grounds.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Section 14(1) Trial on Indictments Act
The High Court may grant bail at any stage in proceedings if the accused has a known place of abode, substantial sureties, and is not a danger to society or the trial.
- 02
Article 23(6) Constitution of Uganda
Every person charged with a criminal offence may apply for bail, and the court may grant it at its discretion, regardless of the offence.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The court found that both applicants are of advanced age and suffer from chronic medical conditions that are aggravated by imprisonment. They have a permanent place of abode and have presented substantial, uncontested sureties. The indefinite adjournment of their trial due to COVID-19 restrictions is not attributable to the applicants and cannot be used against them. The inability to provide a speedy and continuous trial is a failure of the judiciary, not the applicants. The court is satisfied that the applicants meet all statutory and constitutional requirements for bail. Therefore, bail pending trial is granted to both applicants on specified terms and conditions, including execution of non-cash bonds and monthly reporting to the Deputy Registrar until the conclusion of the main criminal case.
Obiter and limits
- Each bail application must be considered on its own facts, especially regarding age and medical condition.
- The inability to provide a speedy trial due to institutional constraints should not prejudice the accused persons.
- The presence of substantial sureties and a permanent place of abode are critical factors in granting bail.
Court disposition
bail_granted_pending_trial
- Nankabirwa Jane Kulumba is granted bail and shall execute a non-cash bond of UGX 50,000,000.
- Each of her sureties shall execute a non-cash bond of UGX 50,000,000 per person.
- Nankabirwa Jane Kulumba shall report before the Deputy Registrar, Criminal Division for bail extension once a month from 1st October 2020 until the main criminal trial is concluded.
- Kulumba John is granted bail pending trial and shall execute a non-cash bond of UGX 50,000,000.
- Each of his approved sureties shall execute a non-cash bond of UGX 50,000,000 per person.
- Kulumba John shall report before the Deputy Registrar, Criminal Division for bail extension once a month from 1st October 2020 until disposal of the main criminal case.
Source and reliance status
HC: Criminal Division (Uganda)
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
HC: Criminal Division (Uganda)
Judgment
THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UGANDA AT KAMPALA
(CRIMINAL DIVISION)
HCT-00-CR-CM-0081-2020
1. NANKABIRWA JANE
2. KALUMBA JOHN …………………………APPLICANTS
VERSUS
UGANDA ……………………..……..………… RESPONDENTS
BEFORE: HON. MR. JUSTICE J. W. KWESIGA
RULING:
The first Applicant Nankabirwa Jane Kulumba aged 53 years is a wife of Kulumba John, the second Applicant aged 53 years. Both represented by Katende, Ssempebwa & Co. Advocates who have by Notice of Motion made an application for Bail pending trial Under Section 14 and 15 of T. I. A and Articles 23 and 28 of the Constitution of the Republic of Uganda.
The two Applicants, a woman and her husband together with several others are indicted in a part heard murder case under Sections 188 and 189 of the Penal Code in High Court Criminal Session Case No. 122 of 2020. The trial started but was indefinitely adjourned due to prevailing restrictions of movement of prisoners from Luzira Government prisons to and from courts. I will now consider these two bail applications jointly.
The Applicants have pleaded not guilty and they are presumed innocent until they are proved guilty.
The Applicants are spouses of advanced age. Each is 53 years old and facing age related illness of diabetes and hypertension.
The two Applicants have a permanent place of abode at Mityana Galabi, Mityana Town Council, proved by affidavit of Kulumba John and annexture 'D' to Nankabirwa's affidavit, to wit a Land Title for the Matrimonial home at Minaana village, Galabi Mityana Central (Mityana Block 139 Plot 77 & 78).
Dr. Kakoraki Alex of Uganda Prisons Medical Services confirmed in a Medical Report dated 27/9/2019 that Kulumba John (2nd Applicant) suffers from chronic Diabetes and Hypertension. My view is that these are types of illnesses that are aggravatable by stress associated with imprisonment.
I have considered the State Attorney's submission that the Applicant has not proved that the illness can not be treated while in prison. In my view, each case must be considered on it's facts. This is a man of advanced age, imprisoned together with his wife and son. The type of illness he suffers from is manageable with among other things appropriate feeding and easy access to frequent medical attention. I am unable to accept this state contention.
The record ground of objection is that the trial has started save that it was differed due to Corona Virus breakout.
This provided for under Section 14(1) of T. I. A that the High Court may at any stage in the proceedings release the Accused person on bail provided:-
- (a) The Court takes from him or her a recognizance consisting abode. - (b) The Court is satisfied that the Accused person has substantial sureties. - (c) The Court is satisfied that the Accused has a known place of abode where to be traced when required. - (d) That he/she is not a danger to society or will interfere with fair trial.
Article 23(6) of the Constitution of Uganda permits every person at anytime, upon or after being charged may apply for release on bail, and the Court may at it's discretion grant the application irrespective of the class of Criminal offence for which the person is charged.
I agree with the State submission that there has not been any inordinate delay in having the Applicants prosecuted. I am alive to the circumstances under which their trial was expedited on Orders of this Court. The Applicants filed their application for bail before they were committed for trial. I Ordered stay of the Application for bail to allow the trial of substantive case's trial which, for the reasons given above has suffered inordinate delay. This can not be used against the Applicants because the inability to accord the Applicants a speedy and continuous trial is on the part of the Judiciary.
The two Applicants have proved to my satisfaction the following factors:-
- (a) The Applicants, Nankabirwa and Kulumba John are the persons of advanced age. - (b) Each of the Applicants have grave medical conditions that are aggravatable by prison stressing conditions. - (c) The Applicants are spouses with a permanent place of abode, their matrimonial home in Mityana Town Council. - (d) The sureties presented have not been contested, they are substantial and are hereby approved.
Therefore, Bail pending trial is hereby granted on the following terms and conditions:-
1. Nankabirwa Jane Kulumba, 53 years:-
- (a) She is granted bail and shall execute a non cash bond of Ug. Shs. 50,000,000/= (Fifty Million Shillings). - (b) Each of her sureties, namely;- - (i) Prosicovia Ssemanda of Mengo Hospital village LC.1. - (ii) Sabakaki James of Kawala Zone I LC.1. - (iii) Sserunkuma Frank Kiwanuka of Kitovu Cell, Local Council, Kitende, Kajansi Town Council shall execute a bond of Ug. Shs. 50,000,000/= (Fifty Million Shillings) Not Cash per person. - (c) The Applicants shall report before the Deputy Registrar,
Criminal Division for Bail extension once a month with effect from
1 st October 2020 until the main Criminal trial is concluded.
2. Kulumba John, 53 years old.
- (a) He is granted bail pending trial and he shall execute a bail bond of Ug. Shs. 50,000,000/= (Fifty Million Shillings) Not Cash. - (b) Each of his approved sureties shall execute a non-cash bond of Ug. Shs. 50,000,000/= (Fifty Million shillings). These are:- - (i) Lwanyage Nasir Abdul of Nakitokolo Cell, Kisozi Ward, Kyengera Town Council, Wakiso District. - (ii) Njuki Henry of Kyebando village LC.1, Wakiso District. - (iii) Lucy Kiwumulo Masiko of Kweeba Zone LC.1, Mutundwe Parish, Rubaga Division. - (iv) Kulumba John shall report and appear before the Deputy Registrar, Criminal Division for bail extension once a month at the beginning of each month with effect from 1st October 2020 until disposal of the main criminal case.
Dated this 7 th day of September 2020.
J. W. Kwesiga
Judge
7 th /9/2020
To be served on:-
1. Applicants C/o. Katende, Ssempebwa & Co. Advocates,
Kampala.
2. The Director of Public Prosecutions, Kampala.
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.