Share
Nalubale Freight Logistics v Musa and 2 Others (Miscellaneous Application 1267 of 2023) [2023] UGCommC 49 (9 August 2023)
- Citation
- [2023] UGCommC 49
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Uganda
- Court
- Commercial Court of Uganda
- Panel
- Harriet Grace Magala, J
- Case number
- Miscellaneous Application 1267 of 2023
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- Commercial Court of Uganda
- Panel
- Harriet Grace Magala, J
- Case number
- Miscellaneous Application 1267 of 2023
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The court found that the applicant had established sufficient grounds for urgency, as the property sought to be attached was at risk of removal from the jurisdiction, which could defeat the purpose of the main application and any subsequent orders. The court held that, pursuant to its inherent powers and the Judicature (Court Vacation) Rules, civil matters of an urgent nature may be heard during court vacation. The applicant's application for a certificate of urgency was therefore granted to prevent injustice and preserve the subject matter pending determination of the main cause.
Court disposition
certificate of urgency granted
Orders
- A certificate of urgency is issued for Miscellaneous Application No. 1266 of 2023 to be heard during court vacation.
- Costs of this application shall abide the outcome of the main cause.
02
Material facts
Parties
Nalubale Freight Logistics
Applicant Counsel: Kiribwa Simon PeterMusa Saidi
RespondentHass Dokita
RespondentGeorine Agencies Ltd.
RespondentAmounts and remedies
- Value of Attached Property: UGX 100,000,000
- Value of Lost Cocoa: USD 18,912
03
Procedural history
Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Certificate of Urgency
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the application for a certificate of urgency meets the threshold for hearing during court vacation.
- 02
Whether the applicant has demonstrated sufficient grounds for urgent attachment of the respondent's property before judgment.
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The applicant argued that the 3rd respondent's vehicles, which are the only known attachable assets, are at risk of being removed from the court's jurisdiction during vacation. The applicant contended that waiting for the vacation to end would render the main application nugatory, as the status quo could change if the vehicles are moved. The applicant further submitted that the urgency is justified by the imminent risk and the need to preserve the subject matter for satisfaction of any future decree.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Section 98 Civil Procedure Act; Rule 3 Judicature (Court Vacation) Rules
Court may exercise inherent powers to make orders necessary for the ends of justice, including hearing urgent civil matters during court vacation.
- 02
Order 52 Civil Procedure Rules
Attachment before judgment may be granted where there is a real risk that the respondent will dispose of or remove property to defeat a potential judgment.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The court found that the applicant had established sufficient grounds for urgency, as the property sought to be attached was at risk of removal from the jurisdiction, which could defeat the purpose of the main application and any subsequent orders. The court held that, pursuant to its inherent powers and the Judicature (Court Vacation) Rules, civil matters of an urgent nature may be heard during court vacation. The applicant's application for a certificate of urgency was therefore granted to prevent injustice and preserve the subject matter pending determination of the main cause.
Obiter and limits
- The costs of the application shall abide the outcome of the main cause.
- Only civil matters deemed urgent by the presiding judge may be entertained during court vacation.
Court disposition
certificate of urgency granted
- A certificate of urgency is issued for Miscellaneous Application No. 1266 of 2023 to be heard during court vacation.
- Costs of this application shall abide the outcome of the main cause.
Source and reliance status
Commercial Court of Uganda
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Commercial Court of Uganda
Judgment
THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA IN THE HIGH COURT OF UAGNDA AT KAMPALA MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 1267 OF 2023 ARISING FROM MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 1266 OF 2023 ALL ARISING FROM CIVIL SUIT NO. 0863 OF 2023 NALUBALE FREIGHT LOGISTICS :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: APPLICANT VERSUS
- 1. MUSA SAIDI - 2. HASS DOKITA - 3. GEORINE AGENCIES LTD. :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: RESPONDENTS
Before Hon. Lady Justice Harriet Grace Magala
RULING
Background
This is an application that was filed under section 33 of the Judicature Act, section 98 of the Civil Procedure Act, Order 52 rules 1,2 and 3 of the Civil Procedure Rules as amended and rule 4 of the Judicature (Court Vacation) Rules. The Applicants seek for orders that a certificate of urgency be issued for the hearing of Miscellaneous Application No. 1266 of 2023 during court vacation and costs be provided for.
The Application was supported by an affidavit deposed by Ernest Wabwire, the Applicant's Director. The grounds are briefly:
- (a) That the Applicant has filed Misc. App. No. 1266 of 2023 for the attachment of the 3 rd Respondent's moveable property- a truck registration number KBZ 705K, a benz actros and trailer registration number ZC 3239 which is yet to be heard and determined; - (b)That the 3rd Respondent is likely to remove from the jurisdiction of this court their only known properties – the truck head and trailer valued at approximately Ugx. 100,000,000/= that could be attached in satisfaction of any orders and /or decrees issued by this court; - (c) That the courts are currently in vacation and if the order of attachment before judgement is not entertained, the main application shall be rendered nugatory;
- (d)That the waiting for court vacation to end was not an option the Applicant could exercise as the status quo might change if the Respondent moved the said vehicles from the jurisdiction of this court; and - (e) That a certificate of urgency is necessary to certify that Misc. App. No. 1266 of 2023 is urgent and should be heard.
Representation
The Applicant was represented by counsel Kiribwa Simon Peter. Present in court was Lukungu Musa, the In-House Legal Counsel of the Applicant.
Hearing
This is an *ex-parte* application for a certificate of urgency to certify that Misc. App. No. 1266 of 2023 is urgent and should be heard during court vacation. Learned counsel for the Applicant relied on the Affidavit in support of the application. The Applicant averred that on the 16th June 2023 they contracted the 3 rd Respondent to transport a consignment of 23,020Kgs of cocoa beans from Olam Uganda Limited in Kampala to Mombasa-Kenya. The 1 st Respondent and 2 nd Respondent were the driver and turn man respectively of the MV transporting the consignment. It later transpired that the 1st and 2nd Respondent tampered with the locks of the container where the consignment was and caused a short fall of 6,840KGS of cocoa valued at USD \$18,912.
The Applicant reported a case of theft at the Jinja Road Station and it was registered as CRB 559/2023. The 1st and 2nd Respondents were charged at the Chief Magistrate's Court at Nakawa and are now on remand at Luzia Prison. The Applicant's Director while following up the matter was informed by the investigating officer a one Asaba Carol that the 3rd Respondent had initiated the process of removing the vehicles from police custody which prompted the Applicant through their lawyer to file Misc. Application No. 1266 of 2023.
Given that the nature of the 3rd Respondent's business required her to traverse the East African Region, if Misc. App. No. 1266 of 2023 is not heard during the court vacation, it shall not only occasion an injustice to the Applicant but it would have rendered the application nugatory.
Counsel for the Applicant prayed that in the circumstances, court be pleased to certify MA 1266 of 2023 as an urgent matter to be heard during court vacation.
Determination
The Applicant/Plaintiff has already filed a MA 1266 of 2023 which awaits to be heard, but is yet to be scheduled for hearing. Section 98 of the Civil Procedure Act refers to the inherent Powers of Court to make Orders that are necessary for the ends for justice. Pursuant to rule 3 of the Judicature (Court Vacation) Rules the Court Vacation runs from 15th July to 15th August. This means that only criminal matters shall be heard and Civil business which "in the opinion of the presiding Judge, shall be of an urgent nature". I am convinced that the Applicant has a good reason and hearing of Misc. App No. 1266 of 2023 is befitting for the issuance of a Certificate of Urgency.
I hereby GRANT the Applicant's prayer and ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF URGENCY to enable this Court to entertain the matter during Court Vacation.
The costs of the Application shall abide the outcome of the main cause.
| Delivered electronically this__ day of _______ 2023 and | 09 | AUGUST | | |-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|----|--------|--| | uploaded on ECCMIS. | | | |
Harriet Grace MAGALA Judge 9 th August 2023
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.