Download

Uganda Judgment

High Court of Uganda

Musoke Jackson v Uganda (Criminal Misc. App. No. 4 of 2008) (Criminal Misc. App. No. 4 of 2008) [2008] UGHC 44 (8 May 2008)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The court held that while the right to apply for bail and the right to a speedy trial are constitutional guarantees, the grant of bail in capital offences remains discretionary. The court found that the offence in question—aggravated robbery—was particularly grave, involving violence and a significant risk to the complainant. The court was not satisfied that there had been inordinate delay by the prosecution, as the case was scheduled for hearing in the next session. Given the seriousness of the charge and the real risk of absconding, the court exercised its discretion to deny bail. The applicant was ordered to remain in custody pending trial.

Court disposition

bail_denied

Orders

  • The application for bail is rejected.
  • The accused/applicant shall be remanded in custody pending trial.

02

Material facts

Parties

Musoke Jackson

Applicant Counsel: Mr. V. Kwizera

Uganda

Respondent Counsel: Mr. B. Mulindwa

Amounts and remedies

  • Amount Allegedly Robbed: UGX 18,000

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Criminal Miscellaneous Application / Bail Application Pending Trial

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The applicant, through counsel, argued that he is entitled to apply for bail under Article 23(6)(a) of the Constitution and that he has a right to a speedy trial under Article 28(1)(3)a. He emphasized that bail is discretionary and cited relevant case law. The applicant and his sureties reside within the court's jurisdiction, and there is no evidence of likelihood to abscond.
Respondent
The respondent, represented by the State Attorney, opposed the application on grounds that the case was scheduled for hearing in the next High Court session and that there was no inordinate delay in prosecuting the applicant. The respondent argued that the gravity of the offence increases the risk of absconding if bail is granted.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Uganda (DPP) Vs. Col (Rtd) Dr. Kiiza Besigye & others, Constitutional Reference No. 20 of 2005

    Bail is not automatic but discretionary, especially in capital offences.

  2. 02

    Constitution of Uganda, Articles 23(6)(a) and 28(1)(3)a

    The right to apply for bail and the right to a speedy trial are constitutional rights, but must be balanced against the gravity of the offence and risk of absconding.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The court held that while the right to apply for bail and the right to a speedy trial are constitutional guarantees, the grant of bail in capital offences remains discretionary. The court found that the offence in question—aggravated robbery—was particularly grave, involving violence and a significant risk to the complainant. The court was not satisfied that there had been inordinate delay by the prosecution, as the case was scheduled for hearing in the next session. Given the seriousness of the charge and the real risk of absconding, the court exercised its discretion to deny bail. The applicant was ordered to remain in custody pending trial.

Obiter and limits

  • No suspect should be kept in custody unnecessarily, but grave accusations must be tried and disposed of on merit.
  • It is vital to society that grave accusations be tried and disposed of on merit, and granting bail in such cases may jeopardize this objective.

Court disposition

bail_denied

  • The application for bail is rejected.
  • The accused/applicant shall be remanded in custody pending trial.

Source and reliance status

High Court of Uganda

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Source document

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

High Court of Uganda

Judgment

[2008] UGHC 44

{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\uc1\deff0\stshfdbch0\stshfloch0\stshfhich0\stshfbi0\deflang2057\deflangfe2057{\fonttbl{\f0\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02020603050405020304}Times New Roman;}{\f171\froman\fcharset238\fprq2 Times New Roman CE;} {\f172\froman\fcharset204\fprq2 Times New Roman Cyr;}{\f174\froman\fcharset161\fprq2 Times New Roman Greek;}{\f175\froman\fcharset162\fprq2 Times New Roman Tur;}{\f176\froman\fcharset177\fprq2 Times New Roman (Hebrew);} {\f177\froman\fcharset178\fprq2 Times New Roman (Arabic);}{\f178\froman\fcharset186\fprq2 Times New Roman Baltic;}{\f179\froman\fcharset163\fprq2 Times New Roman (Vietnamese);}}{\colortbl;\red0\green0\blue0;\red0\green0\blue255;\red0\green255\blue255; \red0\green255\blue0;\red255\green0\blue255;\red255\green0\blue0;\red255\green255\blue0;\red255\green255\blue255;\red0\green0\blue128;\red0\green128\blue128;\red0\green128\blue0;\red128\green0\blue128;\red128\green0\blue0;\red128\green128\blue0; \red128\green128\blue128;\red192\green192\blue192;}{\stylesheet{\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \snext0 Normal;}{\*\cs10 \additive \ssemihidden Default Paragraph

Font;}{\*\ts11\tsrowd\trftsWidthB3\trpaddl108\trpaddr108\trpaddfl3\trpaddft3\trpaddfb3\trpaddfr3\trcbpat1\trcfpat1\tscellwidthfts0\tsvertalt\tsbrdrt\tsbrdrl\tsbrdrb\tsbrdrr\tsbrdrdgl\tsbrdrdgr\tsbrdrh\tsbrdrv \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs20\lang1024\langfe1024\cgrid\langnp1024\langfenp1024 \snext11 \ssemihidden Normal Table;}{\s15\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar \tqc\tx4320\tqr\tx8640\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext15 \styrsid9985038 footer;}{\*\cs16 \additive \sbasedon10 \styrsid9985038 page number;}} {\*\latentstyles\lsdstimax156\lsdlockeddef0}{\*\rsidtbl \rsid2716175\rsid3413427\rsid8461634\rsid9985038\rsid11226551\rsid12322756\rsid12333622\rsid12665346\rsid13768602\rsid13769980}{\*\generator Microsoft Word 11.0.5604;}{\info {\title THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA}{\author rkasule}{\operator jchemeri}{\creatim\yr2009\mo3\dy17\hr12\min39}{\revtim\yr2009\mo3\dy17\hr12\min39}{\printim\yr2008\mo5\dy2\hr16\min49}{\version2}{\edmins1}{\nofpages3}{\nofwords617}{\nofchars3522} {\*\company Courts Of

Judicature}{\nofcharsws4131}{\vern24689}}\widowctrl\ftnbj\aenddoc\noxlattoyen\expshrtn\noultrlspc\dntblnsbdb\nospaceforul\formshade\horzdoc\dgmargin\dghspace180\dgvspace180\dghorigin1800\dgvorigin1440\dghshow1\dgvshow1 \jexpand\viewkind1\viewscale120\pgbrdrhead\pgbrdrfoot\splytwnine\ftnlytwnine\htmautsp\nolnhtadjtbl\useltbaln\alntblind\lytcalctblwd\lyttblrtgr\lnbrkrule\nobrkwrptbl\snaptogridincell\allowfieldendsel\wrppunct \asianbrkrule\rsidroot13768602\newtblstyruls\nogrowautofit \fet0{\*\ftnsep \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid12665346 \chftnsep \par }}{\*\ftnsepc \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid12665346 \chftnsepc \par }}{\*\aftnsep \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid12665346 \chftnsep \par }}{\*\aftnsepc \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid12665346 \chftnsepc \par }}\sectd \linex0\headery708\footery708\colsx708\endnhere\sectlinegrid360\sectdefaultcl\sftnbj {\footer \pard\plain \s15\ql

\li0\ri0\widctlpar \tqc\tx4320\tqr\tx8640\pvpara\phmrg\posxr\posy0\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid12665346 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\field{\*\fldinst {\cs16\insrsid9985038 PAGE }}{\fldrslt { \cs16\lang1024\langfe1024\noproof\insrsid11226551 3}}}{\cs16\insrsid9985038 \par }\pard \s15\ql \li0\ri360\widctlpar\tqc\tx4320\tqr\tx8640\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin360\lin0\itap0\pararsid9985038 {\insrsid9985038 \par }}{\*\pnseclvl1\pnucrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl2\pnucltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl3\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl4\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta )}} {\*\pnseclvl5\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl6\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl7\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl8 \pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl9\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}\pard\plain \qc \li0\ri0\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid11226551 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13768602\charrsid11226551 THE REPUBLIC OF

UGANDA}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid12333622\charrsid11226551 \par }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13768602\charrsid11226551 IN THE HIGH COURT OF UGANDA AT KAMPALA \par CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO.004 OF 2008 \par }\pard \qj \li0\ri0\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid11226551 {\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13768602\charrsid11226551 MUSOKE JACKSON ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: APPLICANT \par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid11226551 {\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13768602\charrsid11226551 VERSUS \par }\pard \qj \li0\ri0\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid11226551 {\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13768602\charrsid11226551 UGANDA ::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: RESPONDENT \par \par }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9985038\charrsid11226551 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13768602\charrsid11226551 BEFORE: HON. JUSTICE J. P. M TABARO \par \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9985038\charrsid11226551 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13768602\charrsid11226551 RULING: \par \par

}{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9985038\charrsid11226551 \par }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13768602\charrsid11226551 On 16-4-2008 the applicant Jackson Musoke, through his Counsel Mr. V. Kwizera, applied for release on bail pending trial. He s tands indicted for aggravated robbery C/Ss 285 and 286(2) of the Penal Code. From the record of proceedings before the Chief Magistrate\rquote s Court it is fairly clear that he was committed for trial in High Court on 14}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\super\langnp2057\insrsid13768602\charrsid11226551 th}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13768602\charrsid11226551 December, 2007. It would appear he wa s first remanded in custody when he made his first appearance before Court on 1-4-2005. The offence in question is alleged to have been committed on or about 15}{\lang2057\langfe1033\super\langnp2057\insrsid13768602\charrsid11226551 th}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13768602\charrsid11226551 March, 2005 at Kawempe is Kampala District, where the accused also hails from. \par \par Mr. Kwizera relies on two grounds both emanating from the Constitution of the Republic of Uganda (1995), that is, the right to apply for bail granted by Article 23(6)(a), and the right to speedy trial in accordance with Article 28(1)(3)a of the Constitution. The ap plicant and his two sureties reside within the jurisdiction of this

Court; it has already been indicated that the accused person\rquote s home is in Kawempe within Kampala District. \par \par The accused person\rquote s application was dismissed on 17-4-2008 on which day Court indicated reasons would be given on 8-5-2008, for the decision of the Court. \par \par The applicant\rquote s Counsel, Mr. Kwizera, emphasised that bail is a matter for the discretion of Court, and relied on this Court\rquote s ruling in Byaruhanga Rugyema Jesse & Anor. Vs. Uganda , Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 87 of 1998, as well as Immaculate Lugolobi Vs. Uganda, Miscella}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2716175\charrsid11226551 neous Application No.30 of 2003 before Bamwine J.}{ \lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13768602\charrsid11226551 \par }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2716175\charrsid11226551 \par Counsel for the respondent Mr. B. Mulindwa, State Attorney, opposed the application and gave two reas ons for the objection, namely; that the case was scheduled to be fixed for hearing at the next High Court Session at Kampala, and that in any case there is no inordinate delay in trying the accused/applicant. \par \par As both Counsel agree the legal position is no w settled in view of the opinion of the Constitutional Court in Uganda (DPP) Vs. Col (Rtd) Dr. Kiiza Besigye & others, Constitutional Reference No. 20 of 2005. Bail is not

automatic but rather discretionary. Hence the question for resolution is whether or not discretion should be exercised in favour of the accused/applicant. \par \par There is no gainsaying that the right to speedy trial is very important and no suspect should be kept in custody unnecessarily. However, the offence in question is very grave, capit al in nature. For this reason temptation to escape and abscond for fear of the consequences is real indeed, in case the state secures a conviction. \par \par There are appropriate cases in which it would be unfair to keep the accused on remand if the prosecution h as failed to proceed; however this is not one of them. I am far from suggesting that due to heavy workload in the Directorate of Public Prosecutions the prosecution should be treated leniently, but I must emphasize that it is vital to society that grave accusations be tried and disposed of on merit. If the accused would dishonour bail in case it were granted, this would not be possible \endash to determine the case on merit.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13768602\charrsid11226551 \par }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2716175\charrsid11226551 \par The circumstances in this case call for diligence, for the reason stated above. It is alleged that the complainant was tied with a telephone wire, his room set ablaze, and locked from inside, after he was robbed of

18,000/=. The complainant is a student. \par It is unnecessary to emphasize that the applicant is presumed innocent, as is required }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9985038\charrsid11226551 consider in legal system. But; as already pointed out, the charge is capital in nature and the surrounding circumstances make it particularly grave. The application for bail therefore rejected. The accused/applicant shall be remanded in custody pend ing trial.}{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid2716175\charrsid11226551 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid9985038\charrsid11226551 \par J. P. M. Tabaro \par Judge \par 8-5-2008 \par }{\b\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13768602\charrsid11226551 \par }{\lang2057\langfe1033\langnp2057\insrsid13768602\charrsid11226551 \par }}

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Uganda (DPP) Vs. Col (Rtd) Dr. Kiiza Besigye & others, Constitutional Reference No. 20 of 2005

Case cited

Byaruhanga Rugyema Jesse & Anor. Vs. Uganda, Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 87 of 1998

Case cited

Immaculate Lugolobi Vs. Uganda, Miscellaneous Application No. 30 of 2003

Case cited

Constitution of the Republic of Uganda, Articles 23(6)(a), 28(1)(3)a

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Penal Code Act, Sections 285 and 286(2)

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this JurisAssist collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.