Download

Uganda Judgment

Supreme Court of Uganda

Mukwano Enterprises Limited v Ranchhobhai & Another (Civil Application 16 of 2019) [2021] UGSC 39 (19 March 2021)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The Supreme Court found that its previous order, which directed the return of recovered property to the liquidator, was made in error due to an accidental slip. The Court clarified that its intention was for the property or its value to be returned to African Textile Mills Ltd (in liquidation), not to the liquidator who had been found to have perpetrated fraud against the company. The Court exercised its powers under Rule 35(1) to correct the order and under Rule 2(2) to make further orders necessary to achieve justice, including the removal of the liquidator and directing shareholders to complete the liquidation process and recover what was decreed to the company. The correction and additional orders were necessary to prevent abuse of the court process and to ensure the integrity of the justice system.

Court disposition

Order corrected to direct payment to African Textile Mills Ltd (in liquidation); liquidator removed; shareholders to complete liquidation and recover decreed property/value.

Orders

  • Order 3 corrected: In the event the return of the plant and machinery is not immediately practicable, the Applicant shall pay to African Textile Mills Limited (in liquidation), the equivalent of Uganda shillings 11,944,127,000 per valuation certificate dated 14th May, 2004 being the replacement value of the plant and machinery.
  • The 2nd respondent, Mr. Sylvester Henry Wambuga, is removed as liquidator of African Textile Mills Ltd (in liquidation) with immediate effect.
  • Shareholders are directed to take appropriate steps to complete the liquidation process and recover what has been decreed to African Textile Mills Ltd (in liquidation) in the judgment of this Court.

02

Material facts

Parties

Mukwano Enterprises Limited

Applicant

Ranchhobhbhai Shivabhai Patel

Respondent

Henry Wambuga (Liquidator of African Textile Mill Limited)

Respondent

Amounts and remedies

  • Replacement Value of Plant and Machinery: UGX 11,944,127,000

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Miscellaneous Application / Correction of Judgment/order Under Rule 2(2) & 35(1) of the Judicature (supreme Court Rules) Directions

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The applicant sought correction of the Supreme Court's previous order, arguing that it was an accidental slip to direct the return of recovered property to the liquidator, who had been found to have perpetrated fraud against African Textile Mills Ltd (in liquidation). The applicant contended that the intention of the Court was to benefit the company in liquidation, not the fraudulent liquidator.
Respondent
The respondents did not provide substantive arguments opposing the correction, and the Court proceeded on the basis of its own motion to clarify and correct the accidental slip in its previous order to reflect its true intention.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Rule 35(1) of the Judicature (Supreme Court Rules) Directions

    A clerical or arithmetical mistake in any judgment or any error arising from an accidental slip or omission may be corrected by the court at any time to give effect to its intention.

  2. 02

    Rule 2(2) of the Judicature (Supreme Court Rules) Directions

    The court may make such orders as are necessary for achieving the ends of justice or to prevent abuse of the process of court.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The Supreme Court found that its previous order, which directed the return of recovered property to the liquidator, was made in error due to an accidental slip. The Court clarified that its intention was for the property or its value to be returned to African Textile Mills Ltd (in liquidation), not to the liquidator who had been found to have perpetrated fraud against the company. The Court exercised its powers under Rule 35(1) to correct the order and under Rule 2(2) to make further orders necessary to achieve justice, including the removal of the liquidator and directing shareholders to complete the liquidation process and recover what was decreed to the company. The correction and additional orders were necessary to prevent abuse of the court process and to ensure the integrity of the justice system.

Obiter and limits

  • It would be a mockery of the justice system to return the recovered properties to the liquidator who perpetrated the fraud against African Textile Mills Limited (in liquidation).

Court disposition

Order corrected to direct payment to African Textile Mills Ltd (in liquidation); liquidator removed; shareholders to complete liquidation and recover decreed property/value.

  • Order 3 corrected: In the event the return of the plant and machinery is not immediately practicable, the Applicant shall pay to African Textile Mills Limited (in liquidation), the equivalent of Uganda shillings 11,944,127,000 per valuation certificate dated 14th May, 2004 being the replacement value of the plant and machinery.
  • The 2nd respondent, Mr. Sylvester Henry Wambuga, is removed as liquidator of African Textile Mills Ltd (in liquidation) with immediate effect.
  • Shareholders are directed to take appropriate steps to complete the liquidation process and recover what has been decreed to African Textile Mills Ltd (in liquidation) in the judgment of this Court.

Source and reliance status

Supreme Court of Uganda

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Source document

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Supreme Court of Uganda

Judgment

[2021] UGSC 39

THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF UGANDA AT KAMPALA

(CORAM: OPIO-AWERI, MUGAMBA, MUHANGUZI, TUHAISE, CHIBITA, JJ. S. C)

CIVIL APPLICATION No. 16 of 2019

MUKWANO ENTERPRISES LIMITED::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

AND

1. RANCHHOBHAI SHIVABHAI PATEL

2. HENRY WAMBUGA (LIQUIDATOR OF

AFRICAN TEXTILE MILL LIMITED):::::::::::::::RESPONDENTS

(Correction of errors under rule 2(2) & 35(1) of the Judicature (Supreme Court Rules) Directions arising from the ruling by the Court in Supreme Court Civil Application No. 16 of 2019.)

DECISION OF THE COURT.

Under rule 35(1) of the Judicature (Supreme Court Rules) Directions, it is provided as follows:

"A clerical or arithmetical mistake in any judgment of the court or any error arising in it from an accidental slip or omission may, at any time whether before or after the judgment has been embodied in an order, be corrected by court, either of its own motion or on application of any interested person so as to give effect to what was the intention of the Court when judgment was given." (Emphasis ours)

$\mathbf{1}$

The Court's ruling in respect of Civil Application No. 16 of 2019, stated as follows:

- 1. The judgment of the Honourable Court in Civil Appeal No. 6 of 2017, is maintained subject to the following clarifications. - 2. The Applicant immediately returns to $M/s$ African Textile Mills Ltd (In Liquidation), the plant, machinery that was in the factory at the time it took over. - 3. In the event, the return of the plant and machinery is not immediately practicable, the Applicant shall pay to the 1st respondent the equivalent $of$ Uganda Shillings 11,944,127,000/= per valuation certificate dated $14^{th}$ May, 2004, being the replacement value of the plant and machinery.

There was an accidental slip in this order. The Court intended for the recovered properties that had been unlawfully disposed of by Mr. Sylvester Henry Wambuga (the Liquidator) to be returned to African Textiles Mills Ltd (in liquidation) on whose behalf the shareholders' derivative suit was brought.

Similarly, it was never the intention of the Court to return the same properties recovered herein to the liquidator who perpetrated the fraud against African Textile Mills Limited (in liquidation). This would be a mockery of the justice system.

Accordingly, Order 3 is corrected to read as follows:

In the event the return of the plant and machinery is not immediately practicable, the Applicant shall pay to African Textile Mills Limited (in liquidation), the equivalent of Uganda shillings 11,944,127,000 per valuation certificate dated 14<sup>th</sup> May, 2004 being the replacement value of the plant and machinery.

The Court is permitted under rule 2(2) of the Court's rules to make such orders as may be necessary for achieving the ends of justice or to prevent abuse of the process of court. We therefore, make the following additional orders to give effect to the Court's decision.

- 5. The 2<sup>nd</sup> respondent, Mr. Sylvester Henry Wambuga, is removed as liquidator of African Textiles Mills Ltd (in liquidation) with immediate effect. - 6. We hereby direct that the shareholders take appropriate steps to complete the liquidation process and also recover what has been decreed to African Textile Mills Ltd (in liquidation) in the judgment of this Court.

Dated at Kampala this .................................... Hon. Justice Rubby Opio-Aweri JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT

$\bigvee$

Hon. Justice Paul K. Mugamba JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT

![](_page_3_Picture_0.jpeg)

Hon. Justice Ezekiel Muhanguzi

$\cdots$

. . . . . . . . . . . .

.......................................

JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT

$\sqrt{N}$

Hon. Justice Percy Night Tuhaise

JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT

$\mathbb{Z}$

Hon. Justice Mike J. Chibita JUSTICE OF SUPREMEC COURT

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Judicature (Supreme Court Rules) Directions, Rule 2(2)

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Judicature (Supreme Court Rules) Directions, Rule 35(1)

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this JurisAssist collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.