Share
Mbowe and Others v Attorney General of the United Republic of Tanzania [2019] EACJ 46 (19 June 2019) (First Instance Division)
- Citation
- [2019] EACJ 46
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Uganda
- Court
- East African Court of Justice
- Panel
- Jundu JA, Mugenyi PJ, Ngiye JA, Ntezilyayo DPJ, Nyachae JA
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- East African Court of Justice
- Panel
- Jundu JA, Mugenyi PJ, Ngiye JA, Ntezilyayo DPJ, Nyachae JA
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The court held that, despite the strength of the Applicants' arguments, the gravity of the allegations and the interests of justice require that both parties be heard before any interim orders are granted. The court emphasized that ex parte relief is exceptional and should only be granted when it is just to do so. In this case, the court was not satisfied that the circumstances warranted ex parte orders and directed that the application be served on the Respondent for an inter partes hearing.
Court disposition
ex parte application for interim orders disallowed; application to proceed inter partes
Orders
- The ex parte application for interim orders is disallowed.
- Applicants are directed to serve the application for interim orders upon the Respondent.
- A date for the hearing of the application inter partes shall be communicated on notice.
02
Material facts
Parties
Freeman A. Mbowe & 3 Others
ApplicantAttorney General of the United Republic of Tanzania
Respondent03
Procedural history
Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Ex Parte Application for Interim Orders
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the circumstances justify granting interim orders on an ex parte basis rather than inter partes.
- 02
Whether the justice of the case requires hearing both parties before granting interim relief.
Party arguments
- Applicant
- Counsel for the Applicants advanced strong arguments in support of the grant of interim orders, emphasizing the urgency and gravity of the allegations necessitating immediate relief.
- Respondent
- The Respondent was not heard at this stage as the application was made ex parte; no arguments from the Respondent are recorded.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Rule 73(2) of the East African Court of Justice Rules of Procedure
Ex parte interim orders may only be granted if the court is satisfied that it is just to do so.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The court held that, despite the strength of the Applicants' arguments, the gravity of the allegations and the interests of justice require that both parties be heard before any interim orders are granted. The court emphasized that ex parte relief is exceptional and should only be granted when it is just to do so. In this case, the court was not satisfied that the circumstances warranted ex parte orders and directed that the application be served on the Respondent for an inter partes hearing.
Court disposition
ex parte application for interim orders disallowed; application to proceed inter partes
- The ex parte application for interim orders is disallowed.
- Applicants are directed to serve the application for interim orders upon the Respondent.
- A date for the hearing of the application inter partes shall be communicated on notice.
Source and reliance status
East African Court of Justice
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
East African Court of Justice
Judgment

IN THE EAST AFRICAN COURT OF JUSTICE AT ARUSHA
FIRST INSTANCE DIVISION
*(Coram: Monica K. Mugenyi, PJ; Faustin Ntezilyayo, DP]; Fakihi A. ]undu, Audace Ngiye & Charles Nyachae, JJ)*
APPLICATION No. 2 OF 2019
(Arising from Reference No. 3 of 2019)
FREEMAN A. MBOWE
& 3 OTHERS APPLICANTS
VERSUS
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA .. RESPONDENT
DATE: 19thJUNE2019
Application No.2 of 2019 Page <sup>1</sup>

.0
RULING OF THE COURT
- 1. We have carefully listened to Counsel for the Applicants in this Application. - 2. They have advanced very strong arguments in support of the grant of the interim orders sought in this matter. - 3. The question before us, however, is whether the case made by the Applicants would warrant the grant of such orders ex *parte* rather than *inter partes.* - 4. Rule 73(2) of this Court's Rules of Procedure enjoins the Court to grant ex parte interim orders only 'if satisfied that it is just to do so.' - 5. We take the view that the gravity of the allegations in support of the present Application are such that the justice of this case requires that the Court hear both Parties *inter partes* before rendering itself on the Application for interim orders. - 6. Accordingly, this ex parte Application is hereby disallowed. The Applicants are directed to serve the Application for interim orders upon the Respondent. A date for its hearing shall be communicated on notice. - 7. We so order.
Dated and delivered at Arusha this 19th day of June 2019.
Hon. Lady Justice Monica K. Mugenyi PRINCIPAL JUDGE
Hon. Justice Faustin Ntezilyayo DEPUTY PRINCIPAL JUDGE
Hon. Justice Fakihi A. Jundu JUDGE
Hon. Justice Audace Ngiye JUDGE
Hon. Justice Charles Nyachae JUDGE
Application No.2 of 2019 Page <sup>3</sup>
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.