Download

Uganda Judgment

East African Court of Justice

Mbowe and Others v Attorney General of the United Republic of Tanzania [2019] EACJ 46 (19 June 2019) (First Instance Division)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The court held that, despite the strength of the Applicants' arguments, the gravity of the allegations and the interests of justice require that both parties be heard before any interim orders are granted. The court emphasized that ex parte relief is exceptional and should only be granted when it is just to do so. In this case, the court was not satisfied that the circumstances warranted ex parte orders and directed that the application be served on the Respondent for an inter partes hearing.

Court disposition

ex parte application for interim orders disallowed; application to proceed inter partes

Orders

  • The ex parte application for interim orders is disallowed.
  • Applicants are directed to serve the application for interim orders upon the Respondent.
  • A date for the hearing of the application inter partes shall be communicated on notice.

02

Material facts

Parties

Freeman A. Mbowe & 3 Others

Applicant

Attorney General of the United Republic of Tanzania

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Ex Parte Application for Interim Orders

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
Counsel for the Applicants advanced strong arguments in support of the grant of interim orders, emphasizing the urgency and gravity of the allegations necessitating immediate relief.
Respondent
The Respondent was not heard at this stage as the application was made ex parte; no arguments from the Respondent are recorded.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Rule 73(2) of the East African Court of Justice Rules of Procedure

    Ex parte interim orders may only be granted if the court is satisfied that it is just to do so.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The court held that, despite the strength of the Applicants' arguments, the gravity of the allegations and the interests of justice require that both parties be heard before any interim orders are granted. The court emphasized that ex parte relief is exceptional and should only be granted when it is just to do so. In this case, the court was not satisfied that the circumstances warranted ex parte orders and directed that the application be served on the Respondent for an inter partes hearing.

Court disposition

ex parte application for interim orders disallowed; application to proceed inter partes

  • The ex parte application for interim orders is disallowed.
  • Applicants are directed to serve the application for interim orders upon the Respondent.
  • A date for the hearing of the application inter partes shall be communicated on notice.

Source and reliance status

East African Court of Justice

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Source document

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

East African Court of Justice

Judgment

[2019] EACJ 46

![](_page_0_Picture_0.jpeg)

IN THE EAST AFRICAN COURT OF JUSTICE AT ARUSHA

FIRST INSTANCE DIVISION

*(Coram: Monica K. Mugenyi, PJ; Faustin Ntezilyayo, DP]; Fakihi A. ]undu, Audace Ngiye & Charles Nyachae, JJ)*

APPLICATION No. 2 OF 2019

(Arising from Reference No. 3 of 2019)

FREEMAN A. MBOWE

& 3 OTHERS APPLICANTS

VERSUS

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA .. RESPONDENT

DATE: 19thJUNE2019

Application No.2 of 2019 Page <sup>1</sup>

![](_page_0_Picture_13.jpeg)

.0

RULING OF THE COURT

- 1. We have carefully listened to Counsel for the Applicants in this Application. - 2. They have advanced very strong arguments in support of the grant of the interim orders sought in this matter. - 3. The question before us, however, is whether the case made by the Applicants would warrant the grant of such orders ex *parte* rather than *inter partes.* - 4. Rule 73(2) of this Court's Rules of Procedure enjoins the Court to grant ex parte interim orders only 'if satisfied that it is just to do so.' - 5. We take the view that the gravity of the allegations in support of the present Application are such that the justice of this case requires that the Court hear both Parties *inter partes* before rendering itself on the Application for interim orders. - 6. Accordingly, this ex parte Application is hereby disallowed. The Applicants are directed to serve the Application for interim orders upon the Respondent. A date for its hearing shall be communicated on notice. - 7. We so order.

Dated and delivered at Arusha this 19th day of June 2019.

Hon. Lady Justice Monica K. Mugenyi PRINCIPAL JUDGE

Hon. Justice Faustin Ntezilyayo DEPUTY PRINCIPAL JUDGE

Hon. Justice Fakihi A. Jundu JUDGE

Hon. Justice Audace Ngiye JUDGE

Hon. Justice Charles Nyachae JUDGE

Application No.2 of 2019 Page <sup>3</sup>

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Rule 73(2) of the East African Court of Justice Rules of Procedure

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this JurisAssist collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.