Share
Mashukano v Uganda (Criminal Miscellaneous Application 141 of 1993) [1993] UGHC 76 (20 December 1993)
- Citation
- [1993] UGHC 76
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Uganda
- Court
- High Court of Uganda
- Panel
- Lugayizi, J
- Case number
- Criminal Miscellaneous Application 141 of 1993
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- High Court of Uganda
- Panel
- Lugayizi, J
- Case number
- Criminal Miscellaneous Application 141 of 1993
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The court found that special circumstances existed within the meaning of S.14A of the Trial on Indictments Decree as amended, justifying the grant of bail to the accused. The State's Certificate of No Objection and the unrefuted submissions regarding the understanding between the accused and the complainant about the cheque were significant. The court was also satisfied with the substance and reliability of the sureties presented. Although the offence was serious and carried a severe sentence, the court determined that the circumstances of the case warranted leniency in the bail conditions. Accordingly, the accused was ordered to be released on bail subject to specific conditions to ensure his return to court and compliance with the law.
Court disposition
bail_granted
Orders
- The accused is to execute a bond in the sum of Ug.shs.300,000/= cash.
- The accused shall deposit his passport or other travel documents with the Deputy Registrar (Criminal) of the High Court.
- The accused shall report to the Central Police Station once a month on the 20th of each month until the case is disposed of or the order is varied.
- Each surety shall execute a bond in the sum of Ug.shs.1,000,000/= not cash.
02
Material facts
Parties
Mashukano Samba Rene
Applicant Counsel: Mr. Nsubuga-MubiruUganda
Respondent Counsel: Miss Stela NkwasibweAmounts and remedies
- Applicant's Cash Bond: UGX 300,000
- Surety Bond (each): UGX 1,000,000
03
Procedural history
Posture
Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Bail Application Ruling
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether special circumstances exist to justify the grant of bail to the accused under S.14A of the Trial on Indictments Decree as amended.
- 02
Whether the sureties presented are substantial and sufficient to ensure the accused's return to court.
Party arguments
- Applicant
- Counsel for the accused argued that special circumstances existed to warrant the grant of bail. It was submitted that there was an understanding between the accused and the complainant that the cheque in issue was to be taken only as another guarantee and not to be presented. The accused produced two substantial sureties and was willing to comply with bail conditions.
- Respondent
- The State did not oppose the application and issued a Certificate of No Objection in favour of the accused. The State did not refute the applicant's submissions regarding the circumstances of the offence or the understanding about the cheque.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
S.14A of the Trial on Indictments Decree (T.I.D.) as amended by Statutes No.5 of 1985 and 5 of 1990
Bail may be granted where special circumstances exist as per S.14A of the Trial on Indictments Decree as amended.
- 02
Judicial practice; referenced in the ruling
The court must be satisfied that sureties are substantial and will ensure the accused's return to court.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The court found that special circumstances existed within the meaning of S.14A of the Trial on Indictments Decree as amended, justifying the grant of bail to the accused. The State's Certificate of No Objection and the unrefuted submissions regarding the understanding between the accused and the complainant about the cheque were significant. The court was also satisfied with the substance and reliability of the sureties presented. Although the offence was serious and carried a severe sentence, the court determined that the circumstances of the case warranted leniency in the bail conditions. Accordingly, the accused was ordered to be released on bail subject to specific conditions to ensure his return to court and compliance with the law.
Obiter and limits
- Although the offence with which the accused was charged is very serious and carries a severe sentence, the court was compelled not to be harsh due to the circumstances surrounding the commission of the offence.
- The understanding between the accused and the complainant regarding the cheque influenced the court's approach to bail conditions.
Court disposition
bail_granted
- The accused is to execute a bond in the sum of Ug.shs.300,000/= cash.
- The accused shall deposit his passport or other travel documents with the Deputy Registrar (Criminal) of the High Court.
- The accused shall report to the Central Police Station once a month on the 20th of each month until the case is disposed of or the order is varied.
- Each surety shall execute a bond in the sum of Ug.shs.1,000,000/= not cash.
Source and reliance status
High Court of Uganda
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
High Court of Uganda
Judgment
Hon Mr. Justice F. M. S. Egenda-Nifende
THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UGANDA AT KAMPALA MISC. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 141/93 (ARISING FROM BUGANDA ROAD COURT CRIMINAL CASE NO. U. 1714 OF 1993):
MASHUKANO SAMBA RENE :::::::::::::::::::::: APPLICANT VERSUS
UGANDA ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: BEFORE: THE HON. MR. JUSTICE E. S. LUGAYIZI:
RULING:
Having heard from both counsel, and bearing in mind the fact that the State does not oppose this application and has in fact released a Certificate of No Objection in favour of the accused (which Certificate is herein marked as Exh.3). I am satisfied that special circumstances do exist (within the meaning laid down in S.14A of the T. I. D. as amended by Statutes No.5 of 1985 and 5 of 1990) to justify this court releasing the accused on bail.
I have further examined the two sureties produced before me in this case and I believe they are substantial and will ensure the accused's return to court to answer the charges herein.
ORDER:
I therefore order that the accused be released on bail on the following terms:-
- He is to execute a bond in the sum of Ug.shs.300,000/= $1.$ CASH. - He shall deposit his passport or other travel documents $2.$ with the Deputy Registrar(Cr.) of the High Court. - He shall report to the Central Police Station once $3.$ a month (i.e. on the 20th of each month - beginning with January, 1994) until his case is finally disposed of or this order is varied.
$000/2000$
The accused person's sureties shall execute a bond in the sum of Ug\* shs\*1m/= each NOT. CASH\*
/Although the offence with which the accused was charged is a very serious one carrying <sup>a</sup> severe sentence of ten years' (10) imprisonment, in laying down the conditions to be met by the accused before he is to be released on bail, I have been compelled not to be harsh because of the circumstances surrounding the commission of the offence\* For example counsel for the accused submitted (and it was not refuted by the State) that there was an understanding between the accused and the complainant that the cheque in issue was to be taken only as another guarantee but was not to be presented\* However, the complainant did not honour that\*
All in all, I now send this file to the Deputy Registrar (Cr«) High Court of Uganda to ensure compliance with the details of the above order\*
E\*S\* Lugayifci'- Ji
20/12/95«
20/12/9?:
Accused present\*
Mr\* Nsubuga-Mubiru for Accused\* Miss Stela Nkwasibwe for the State\* Mr\* Byamugisha Court/Clerk\*
EoS\* Luga^izl j
AG\* JUDGE 20/12/95°
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.