Download

Uganda Judgment

High Court of Uganda

Mashukano v Uganda (Criminal Miscellaneous Application 141 of 1993) [1993] UGHC 76 (20 December 1993)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The court found that special circumstances existed within the meaning of S.14A of the Trial on Indictments Decree as amended, justifying the grant of bail to the accused. The State's Certificate of No Objection and the unrefuted submissions regarding the understanding between the accused and the complainant about the cheque were significant. The court was also satisfied with the substance and reliability of the sureties presented. Although the offence was serious and carried a severe sentence, the court determined that the circumstances of the case warranted leniency in the bail conditions. Accordingly, the accused was ordered to be released on bail subject to specific conditions to ensure his return to court and compliance with the law.

Court disposition

bail_granted

Orders

  • The accused is to execute a bond in the sum of Ug.shs.300,000/= cash.
  • The accused shall deposit his passport or other travel documents with the Deputy Registrar (Criminal) of the High Court.
  • The accused shall report to the Central Police Station once a month on the 20th of each month until the case is disposed of or the order is varied.
  • Each surety shall execute a bond in the sum of Ug.shs.1,000,000/= not cash.

02

Material facts

Parties

Mashukano Samba Rene

Applicant Counsel: Mr. Nsubuga-Mubiru

Uganda

Respondent Counsel: Miss Stela Nkwasibwe

Amounts and remedies

  • Applicant's Cash Bond: UGX 300,000
  • Surety Bond (each): UGX 1,000,000

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Bail Application Ruling

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
Counsel for the accused argued that special circumstances existed to warrant the grant of bail. It was submitted that there was an understanding between the accused and the complainant that the cheque in issue was to be taken only as another guarantee and not to be presented. The accused produced two substantial sureties and was willing to comply with bail conditions.
Respondent
The State did not oppose the application and issued a Certificate of No Objection in favour of the accused. The State did not refute the applicant's submissions regarding the circumstances of the offence or the understanding about the cheque.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    S.14A of the Trial on Indictments Decree (T.I.D.) as amended by Statutes No.5 of 1985 and 5 of 1990

    Bail may be granted where special circumstances exist as per S.14A of the Trial on Indictments Decree as amended.

  2. 02

    Judicial practice; referenced in the ruling

    The court must be satisfied that sureties are substantial and will ensure the accused's return to court.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The court found that special circumstances existed within the meaning of S.14A of the Trial on Indictments Decree as amended, justifying the grant of bail to the accused. The State's Certificate of No Objection and the unrefuted submissions regarding the understanding between the accused and the complainant about the cheque were significant. The court was also satisfied with the substance and reliability of the sureties presented. Although the offence was serious and carried a severe sentence, the court determined that the circumstances of the case warranted leniency in the bail conditions. Accordingly, the accused was ordered to be released on bail subject to specific conditions to ensure his return to court and compliance with the law.

Obiter and limits

  • Although the offence with which the accused was charged is very serious and carries a severe sentence, the court was compelled not to be harsh due to the circumstances surrounding the commission of the offence.
  • The understanding between the accused and the complainant regarding the cheque influenced the court's approach to bail conditions.

Court disposition

bail_granted

  • The accused is to execute a bond in the sum of Ug.shs.300,000/= cash.
  • The accused shall deposit his passport or other travel documents with the Deputy Registrar (Criminal) of the High Court.
  • The accused shall report to the Central Police Station once a month on the 20th of each month until the case is disposed of or the order is varied.
  • Each surety shall execute a bond in the sum of Ug.shs.1,000,000/= not cash.

Source and reliance status

High Court of Uganda

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Source document

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

High Court of Uganda

Judgment

[1993] UGHC 76

Hon Mr. Justice F. M. S. Egenda-Nifende

THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UGANDA AT KAMPALA MISC. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 141/93 (ARISING FROM BUGANDA ROAD COURT CRIMINAL CASE NO. U. 1714 OF 1993):

MASHUKANO SAMBA RENE :::::::::::::::::::::: APPLICANT VERSUS

UGANDA ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: BEFORE: THE HON. MR. JUSTICE E. S. LUGAYIZI:

RULING:

Having heard from both counsel, and bearing in mind the fact that the State does not oppose this application and has in fact released a Certificate of No Objection in favour of the accused (which Certificate is herein marked as Exh.3). I am satisfied that special circumstances do exist (within the meaning laid down in S.14A of the T. I. D. as amended by Statutes No.5 of 1985 and 5 of 1990) to justify this court releasing the accused on bail.

I have further examined the two sureties produced before me in this case and I believe they are substantial and will ensure the accused's return to court to answer the charges herein.

ORDER:

I therefore order that the accused be released on bail on the following terms:-

- He is to execute a bond in the sum of Ug.shs.300,000/= $1.$ CASH. - He shall deposit his passport or other travel documents $2.$ with the Deputy Registrar(Cr.) of the High Court. - He shall report to the Central Police Station once $3.$ a month (i.e. on the 20th of each month - beginning with January, 1994) until his case is finally disposed of or this order is varied.

$000/2000$

The accused person's sureties shall execute a bond in the sum of Ug\* shs\*1m/= each NOT. CASH\*

/Although the offence with which the accused was charged is a very serious one carrying <sup>a</sup> severe sentence of ten years' (10) imprisonment, in laying down the conditions to be met by the accused before he is to be released on bail, I have been compelled not to be harsh because of the circumstances surrounding the commission of the offence\* For example counsel for the accused submitted (and it was not refuted by the State) that there was an understanding between the accused and the complainant that the cheque in issue was to be taken only as another guarantee but was not to be presented\* However, the complainant did not honour that\*

All in all, I now send this file to the Deputy Registrar (Cr«) High Court of Uganda to ensure compliance with the details of the above order\*

E\*S\* Lugayifci'- Ji

20/12/95«

20/12/9?:

Accused present\*

Mr\* Nsubuga-Mubiru for Accused\* Miss Stela Nkwasibwe for the State\* Mr\* Byamugisha Court/Clerk\*

EoS\* Luga^izl j

AG\* JUDGE 20/12/95°

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Trial on Indictments Decree S.14A as amended by Statutes No.5 of 1985 and 5 of 1990

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this JurisAssist collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.