Share
Komakech v Uganda (Miscellaneous Application 29 of 2024) [2024] UGHCCRD 35 (16 April 2024)
- Citation
- [2024] UGHCCRD 35
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Uganda
- Court
- HC: Criminal Division (Uganda)
- Panel
- Muwata, J
- Case number
- Miscellaneous Application 29 of 2024
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- HC: Criminal Division (Uganda)
- Panel
- Muwata, J
- Case number
- Miscellaneous Application 29 of 2024
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The applicant has been on remand since 16th November 2022 for an offence triable by the High Court and more than 60 days have elapsed without trial commencing. The respondent did not contest this fact. Article 23(6)(b) of the Constitution and Rule 9 of the Bail Guidelines make it mandatory for the court to release such a person on bail, subject to reasonable conditions. The court is therefore obliged to grant bail, and the only discretion lies in determining the conditions for release. The applicant's fixed place of abode and substantial sureties further support the grant of bail. Accordingly, bail is granted with specified conditions.
Court disposition
bail_granted
Orders
- The applicant shall deposit a cash bail of UGX 1,000,000.
- Each surety shall execute a non-cash bond of UGX 5,000,000.
- The applicant shall report to the Deputy Registrar of the court every last Monday of the month beginning 29th April 2024.
02
Material facts
Parties
Komakech Robert
ApplicantUganda
RespondentAmounts and remedies
- Cash Bail Amount: UGX 1,000,000
- Surety Bond Amount: UGX 5,000,000
03
Procedural history
Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Bail Application Ruling
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the applicant is entitled to bail under Article 23(6)(b) of the Constitution given the period spent on remand.
- 02
Whether the applicant is likely to abscond if granted bail.
- 03
What reasonable conditions should be imposed for bail.
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The applicant argued that he has been on remand since 16th November 2022 on charges of malicious damage to property, was committed for trial on 8th September 2023, and there is a real likelihood of substantial delay in hearing his case. He asserted having a fixed place of abode, substantial sureties, and that he enjoys the presumption of innocence and will not abscond if granted bail. He prayed for the court to exercise its discretionary power in favor of his right to personal liberty.
- Respondent
- The respondent did not specifically object to the bail application but requested that, should bail be granted, the court should impose appropriate conditions to ensure the applicant returns to answer the charges.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Article 23(6)(a) of the Constitution
The right to apply for bail for persons charged with a criminal offence is guaranteed by the Constitution, regardless of whether one has been committed for trial.
- 02
Article 28(3)(a) of the Constitution
Presumption of innocence until proven guilty is a fundamental principle in bail applications.
- 03
Article 23(6)(b) of the Constitution; Rule 9 of the Constitution (Bail Guidelines for Courts of Judicature) (Practice) Directions, 2022
Mandatory bail is required where an accused has been remanded for 60 days without trial for offences triable by the High Court or subordinate courts.
- 04
DPP Vs. Col. Kiiza Besigye. Constitutional Court Reference No.20 of 2005
Grant of bail is not automatic and depends on whether the applicant will not abscond.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The applicant has been on remand since 16th November 2022 for an offence triable by the High Court and more than 60 days have elapsed without trial commencing. The respondent did not contest this fact. Article 23(6)(b) of the Constitution and Rule 9 of the Bail Guidelines make it mandatory for the court to release such a person on bail, subject to reasonable conditions. The court is therefore obliged to grant bail, and the only discretion lies in determining the conditions for release. The applicant's fixed place of abode and substantial sureties further support the grant of bail. Accordingly, bail is granted with specified conditions.
Obiter and limits
- The grant of bail is not automatic; the main consideration is whether the applicant will not abscond if released.
- The applicant has already been committed to the High Court for trial, but the mandatory period for bail had lapsed prior to committal.
Court disposition
bail_granted
- The applicant shall deposit a cash bail of UGX 1,000,000.
- Each surety shall execute a non-cash bond of UGX 5,000,000.
- The applicant shall report to the Deputy Registrar of the court every last Monday of the month beginning 29th April 2024.
Source and reliance status
HC: Criminal Division (Uganda)
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
HC: Criminal Division (Uganda)
Judgment
THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UGANDA AT KAMPALA
CRIMINAL DIVISION
MISC. APPLICATION NO.29 OF 2024
ARISING FROM THE CHIEF MAGISTRATES COURT OF ENTEBBE AT ENTEBBE CRIMINAL CASE NO.536 &746 OF 2022.
KOMAKECH ROBERT ----------------------------APPLICANT
VERSUS
UGANDA----------------------------------------------RESPONDENT
RULING
BEFORE HON: JUSTICE ISAAC MUWATA
The applicant seeks to be released on bail pursuant to Article 23(6)(a),28(3)(b) of the constitution, section 14 of the TIA, Section 33 of the Judicature Act and Rule 2 of the Judicature (Criminal Procedure) Application Rules.
The grounds of his application are mainly that on the 16th day of November 2022, the applicants were arrested, charged and arraigned before the Chief Magistrates Court of Entebbe on charges of malicious damage to property contrary to section 335(1) of the Penal Code and subsequently remanded.
That he has been on remand since 16th November ,2022 on charges of malicious damage to property. The applicant also stated that he was committed for trial on the 8th day of September,2023 and there is a real likelihood of substantial delay in hearing his case.
The applicant also stated that they have a fixed place of abode and that they have substantial sureties. In addition, the applicant stated that he still enjoys the presumption of innocence and will not abscond if granted bail.
He prayed that court exercises its discretionary power while taking into account his right to personal liberty.
In reply, the prosecution did not specifically object to the application for bail, rather he prayed that should the court grant the application, then it should impose appropriate conditions to compel his return to answer the charges preferred against him.
Consideration
The constitution guarantees the right to apply for bail for persons who have been charged with a criminal offence, regardless of whether one has been committed for trial or not. See: Article 23(6)(a) of the Constitution.
The basis of this right is anchored on the principle of presumption of innocence enshrined in Article 28(3) (a) of the Constitution that an accused person is presumed innocent until proven guilty. However, it should be noted that the grant of bail is not automatic. See: DPP Vs. Col. Kiiza Besigye. Constitutional Court Reference No.20 of 2005.
The main consideration while considering an application for bail by the court is whether the applicant will not abscond if granted bail.
The applicant contends that he has spent over a year on remand having been remanded on the 16th November 2022 and that there is a real likelihood of delay in hearing his case.
Article 23(6)(b) of the constitution and Rule 9 of the constitution (bail guidelines for courts of judicature) (practice) directions, 2022 provides for Mandatory bail for offences triable by High Court and Magistrates Courts. It provides that;
Where an offence is triable by the High Court as well as by a subordinate Court, if a person has been remanded in custody in respect of that offence for 60 days and trial has not commenced, that person shall be released on bail on such conditions as the court considers reasonable.
In the instant application, the applicant stated that he was remanded on the 16th November 2022, this fact was not contested by the respondent. From 16th November 2023, the trial of the applicant has not commenced and more than 60days have lapsed without the trial commencing.
Once a person has been remanded in custody in respect of an offence triable by the High Court as well as a subordinate court for 60 days and trial has not commenced, the court is obliged to release the person on bail on such conditions as the court considers reasonable. The above section makes it mandatory to release such a person on bail, the court only determines the conditions it considers reasonable in the circumstances. I take note that the applicant has already been committed to the High Court for trial but at the time he was committed the 60days had also lapsed.
Accordingly, the applicant is granted bail on the following terms
He shall deposit a cash bail of shs. 1,000,000/=
Each of the sureties presented in court shall execute a non-cash bond of shs. 5,000,000/= not cash
The applicant shall report to the Deputy Registrar of this court every last Monday of the Month beginning 29th April ,2024
I so order
JUDGE
16/04/2024
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.