Download

Uganda Judgment

HC: Land Division (Uganda)

Kateregga Ronald v Kaweke James and Others (Miscellaneous Cause 180 of 2024) [2025] UGHCLD 83 (12 June 2025)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The court found that the sale agreement required payment of the balance within two weeks from 11th July 2018, making the deadline 25th July 2018. Since the application was filed nearly seven years later, it is barred by the statutory limitation period under Section 3(1)(a) of the Limitation Act. The applicant's inability to locate the vendors does not extend or suspend the limitation period. The application is therefore dismissed as time-barred.

Court disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application is dismissed as barred under the Limitation Act.
  • No order as to costs.

02

Material facts

Parties

Kateregga Ronald

Applicant

Kaweke James

Respondent

Naiga Rebecca

Respondent

Nakanwagi Harriet

Respondent

Katende Derrick

Respondent

Jesse Maurice Kijjambu

Respondent

Amounts and remedies

  • Outstanding Balance of Purchase Price: UGX 47,000,000

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Miscellaneous Application / Ruling

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The applicant seeks an order to deposit UGX 47,000,000 in court as the outstanding balance of the purchase price for land, claiming inability to locate the vendors to receive payment.
Respondent
No reply was filed and respondents did not appear at the hearing.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Section 3(1)(a) of the Limitation Act Cap 290

    No action on contract shall be brought after six years from the date on which the cause of action arose.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The court found that the sale agreement required payment of the balance within two weeks from 11th July 2018, making the deadline 25th July 2018. Since the application was filed nearly seven years later, it is barred by the statutory limitation period under Section 3(1)(a) of the Limitation Act. The applicant's inability to locate the vendors does not extend or suspend the limitation period. The application is therefore dismissed as time-barred.

Court disposition

application dismissed

  • The application is dismissed as barred under the Limitation Act.
  • No order as to costs.

Source and reliance status

HC: Land Division (Uganda)

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Source document

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

HC: Land Division (Uganda)

Judgment

[2025] UGHCLD 83

THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UGANDA AT KAMPALA

(LAND DTVTSION)

MISCELLENEOUS AfPI{€AIICIN NO. 180 OF 2024

IN THE MATTER AN APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER TO DEPOSIT OUTSTANDING BALANCE OF PURCHASE PRICE IN COURT

AND

IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION BY KATEREGGA RONALD (APPLICANT)

KATEREGGA ft QfrlIlp======================================APPLICANT l5

. VS.

1. KAWEKE JAMES

I()

- 2. NAIGA REBECCA - 3. NAKANWAGI HARRIET

4. KATENDE DERRICK l0

5. JESSE MAURICE KIJJAMBU============================RESPONDENTS

Before: Hon. Lady Justice Olive Kazaarwe Mukwaya

RULING

This application is brought by a purchaser of land comprised in Kyadondo Block 243 Plot '1661 situate at Luzira. The agreement for sale a copy of which is annexed to the Application is dated '1 1th July 20'18. l5

Mr. Kateregga Ronald the purchaser was registered on the Certificate of Title to the suit land on the 23'd May 2022 according to a copy of the Certificate of Title marked 'D'.

The grounds for the application are that Mr. Kateregga be issued with an order directing, allowing him to deposit the outstanding amount of the purchase price of UGX.47,000,000/= in court, since he has not been able to locate the vendors to receive it.

There is no reply to the application. When this matter came up for hearing, the Applicant and his Counsel did not appear.

t5

t0

I have perused the sale agreement Annexure 'A' clause 2(b) states;

"The balance of UGX. 100,000,000/= (Uganda Shillings One Hundred Million Only) shall be paid to the vendors within two weeks from execution of these presents"

l0 Two weeks from the 'l 1th July 20'18, was the 15rh July 2018. lt has been six (6) years and 11 months since that date.

Under Section 3 (1) (a) of lhe Limitation Act Cap 290, no aclion on contract shall be brought six (6) years from the date on which the cause of action arose.

l5

This application is therefore barred under the Limitation Act and is accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs.

/ tt r----

Olive Kazaaruye Mukwaya JUDGE

12th June 2025

Delivered by Eccmis to Counsel for the parties.

.i5

i0

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Limitation Act Cap 290

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this JurisAssist collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.