Share
Kare Distribution and Another v African Rivers Fund (Miscellaneous Application 1271 of 2023) [2023] UGCommC 48 (9 August 2023)
- Citation
- [2023] UGCommC 48
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Uganda
- Court
- Commercial Court of Uganda
- Panel
- Harriet Grace Magala, J
- Case number
- Miscellaneous Application 1271 of 2023
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- Commercial Court of Uganda
- Panel
- Harriet Grace Magala, J
- Case number
- Miscellaneous Application 1271 of 2023
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The court found that there was no urgency warranting the hearing of Miscellaneous Application No. 1270 of 2023 during court vacation. The sale of the property was scheduled to occur after the end of the court vacation, and the trial judge assigned to the counterclaim would be available to hear the matter immediately after vacation. Therefore, the applicants could seek a hearing in the ordinary course without risk of injustice or irreparable harm during the vacation period. The application for a certificate of urgency was accordingly denied.
Court disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- The application for a certificate of urgency is denied.
- Applicants to approach the trial judge to fix Miscellaneous Application No. 1270 of 2023 for hearing after vacation.
- No order as to costs.
02
Material facts
Parties
Kare Distribution
Applicant Counsel: Bwesigye EnockGeoffrey Karegeya
Applicant Counsel: Bwesigye EnockAfrican Rivers Fund
Respondent03
Procedural history
Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Certificate of Urgency for Hearing During Court Vacation
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether there is an urgency for court to hear Miscellaneous Application No. 1270 of 2023 during court vacation.
- 02
What other remedies are available to the parties.
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The applicants argued that the respondent has not prosecuted the counterclaim since October 2022, and that the respondent advertised the property for sale on 4th August 2023, which is the subject of the loan in the counterclaim. They contended that hearing MA 1270 of 2023 during court vacation is urgent to prevent a double recovery and to stop the imminent sale of the property.
- Respondent
- The application was ex parte; the respondent did not appear or file arguments.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Section 33 of the Judicature Act; Section 98 of the Civil Procedure Act; Order 52 rules 1, 2 and 3 of the Civil Procedure Rules
A certificate of urgency is granted only where there is a real and imminent risk that cannot be addressed in the ordinary course of court business.
- 02
Rule 4 of the Judicature (Court Vacation) Rules
Court vacation rules allow for urgent matters to be heard if the urgency is demonstrated and the matter cannot wait until the court resumes normal sittings.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The court found that there was no urgency warranting the hearing of Miscellaneous Application No. 1270 of 2023 during court vacation. The sale of the property was scheduled to occur after the end of the court vacation, and the trial judge assigned to the counterclaim would be available to hear the matter immediately after vacation. Therefore, the applicants could seek a hearing in the ordinary course without risk of injustice or irreparable harm during the vacation period. The application for a certificate of urgency was accordingly denied.
Obiter and limits
- Applicants are advised to approach the trial judge to fix Miscellaneous Application No. 1270 of 2023 for hearing as soon as possible.
- There shall be no order as to costs.
Court disposition
application dismissed
- The application for a certificate of urgency is denied.
- Applicants to approach the trial judge to fix Miscellaneous Application No. 1270 of 2023 for hearing after vacation.
- No order as to costs.
Source and reliance status
Commercial Court of Uganda
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Commercial Court of Uganda
Judgment
THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA IN THE HIGH COURT OF UGANDA AT KAMPALA COMMERCIAL DIVISION
MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 1271 OF 2023
ARISING FROM MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 1270 OF 2023
ALL ARISING FROM COUNTER CLAIM NO. 700 OF 2019
1. KARE DISTRIBUTION
2. GEOFFREY KAREGEYA :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: APPLICANTS VERSUS
AFRICAN RIVERS FUND ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: RESPONDENT
Before Hon. Lady Justice Harriet Grace Magala Ruling
Background
This is an application that was filed under section 33 of the Judicature Act, section 98 of the Civil Procedure Act, Order 52 rules 1,2 and 3 of the Civil Procedure Rules as amended and rule 4 of the Judicature (Court Vacation) Rules. The Applicants seek for orders that a certificate of urgency be issued for the hearing of Miscellaneous Application No. 1270 of 2023 during court vacation or in the alternative court issues direction for the expeditious hearing of Misc. App. No. 1270 of 2023 and costs be provided for.
The Application was supported by an affidavit deposed by the 2nd Applicant whose are grounds briefly :
- a) That the court on 25th October 2022 directed that the counter claim number 700 of 2019 be scheduled for hearing before this court but to date the counter claimant / Respondent has not taken any step to prosecute the said matter; - b) That on the 4th August 2023 the Respondent/ Counterclaimant advertised the property for sale which is the subject of the loan that the counter claimant /Respondent seeks to recover in the counter claim which would amount to a double recovery; and - c) That there is an urgent need to hear MA 1270 of 2023 during the court vacation which seeks to stop the sale of the property.
Hearing and Representation
This is an ex- parte application. The Applicants were represented by Bwesigye Enock, an advocate with M/s FACTUM Advocates. He relied on the Affidavit in support of the Application and prayed that court finds it urgent that MA 1270 of 2023 should be heard during court vacation before the 21 days in the advertisement for sale of the property lapse.
Issue
Whether there is an urgency for court to hear MA 1270 of 2023 during court vacation
What other remedies are available to the Parties?
Determination
Issue 1
I have read the affidavit in support of the application, the attachments thereto and find that there is no urgency to hear MA 1270 of 2023 during court vacation for the following reasons:
- 1. The Suit property was re-advertised for sale by M/s Quickway Auctioneers & Court Bailiffs in the Daily Monitor Newspaper of 4th August 2023. The advert is to the effect that the property shall be sold after 21 working days from the 4th August 2023. This implies that the sale shall occur on the 4 th September 2023 after court vacation which comes to an end on the 15th August 2023. The sale is therefore not imminent during the court vacation period. - 2. Secondly, the counter claim out of which MA 1270 of 2023 arises is allocated to the Hon. Lady Justice Anna B. Mugenyi who shall be available to resume her duties from her leave with effect from the 16th August 2023.
Issue 2
The Applicants through their legal Counsel are hereby advised to attend the Chambers of trial judge - the Hon. Lady Justice Anna B. Mugenyi to fix MA 1270 of 2023 for hearing as soon as possible.
There shall be no order as to costs.
Dated at Kampala this 9th day of August 2023.
The Ruling has been electronically delivered/uploaded on ECCMIS this 9th day of August 2023.
Harriet Grace MAGALA
Judge
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.