Download

Uganda Judgment

HC: Criminal Division (Uganda)

Kamugisha v Uganda (Criminal Misc. Cause No.94 of 2007) [2007] UGHCCRD 3 (25 May 2007)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The applicant proved he was of advanced age, which constitutes an exceptional circumstance under the Trial on Indictments Act. He presented substantial sureties and satisfied all statutory requirements for bail. The prosecution did not contest the evidence or present any reason to deny bail. The court exercised its discretion and found the applicant to be a fit and proper person for bail, granting it subject to specified conditions.

Court disposition

bail_granted

Orders

  • The applicant is to enter into a bond with the Registrar (Crime) in an amount of UGX 3,000,000 not cash, guaranteeing attendance at the Chief Magistrate’s Court.
  • Each of the three sureties will enter into a bond with the Registrar (Crime) in an amount of UGX 5,000,000 not cash, guaranteeing the applicant's attendance.
  • The applicant must surrender his passport to the Registrar (Crime).
  • The applicant must report to the Registrar (Crime) twice every month: on the first Friday and last Friday of each month.
  • The applicant must report to the Chief Magistrate’s Court Buganda Road at Kampala on the next date fixed for mention of his case.

02

Material facts

Parties

Hon. Dr. Alex Kamugisha

Applicant

Uganda

Respondent Counsel: Mr. Harrison Ahimbisibwe

Amounts and remedies

  • Applicant Bond Amount: UGX 3,000,000
  • Surety Bond Amount (each): UGX 5,000,000

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Criminal Miscellaneous Cause / Bail Application

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The applicant relied on advanced age as an exceptional circumstance under S.15(3)(c) of the Trial on Indictments Act, submitting evidence of his birth date (10.7.1948) and stating he is 58 years old. He also deponed that he is married with a family, has a fixed place of abode, and has never jumped bail. Three substantial sureties were presented.
Respondent
Counsel for the IGG, Mr. Harrison Ahimbisibwe, did not contest the evidence of advanced age and made no comment on the applicant's age. No evidence was presented to challenge the applicant's suitability for bail or to suggest he had ever jumped bail.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Section 15(1), (3)(c) of the Trial on Indictments Act

    Court has discretion to grant bail in cases involving exceptional circumstances, including advanced age.

  2. 02

    Section 75(2) of the Magistrate's Courts Act

    Bail for Abuse of Office is only grantable by the High Court.

  3. 03

    Section 15(4) of the Trial on Indictments Act

    Applicant must present substantial sureties and satisfy other bail requirements.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The applicant proved he was of advanced age, which constitutes an exceptional circumstance under the Trial on Indictments Act. He presented substantial sureties and satisfied all statutory requirements for bail. The prosecution did not contest the evidence or present any reason to deny bail. The court exercised its discretion and found the applicant to be a fit and proper person for bail, granting it subject to specified conditions.

Obiter and limits

  • Any age above 50 may be considered advanced age for purposes of bail applications.
  • The prosecution did not produce any evidence that the applicant has ever jumped bail.
  • There are no other charges pending against the applicant.

Court disposition

bail_granted

  • The applicant is to enter into a bond with the Registrar (Crime) in an amount of UGX 3,000,000 not cash, guaranteeing attendance at the Chief Magistrate’s Court.
  • Each of the three sureties will enter into a bond with the Registrar (Crime) in an amount of UGX 5,000,000 not cash, guaranteeing the applicant's attendance.
  • The applicant must surrender his passport to the Registrar (Crime).
  • The applicant must report to the Registrar (Crime) twice every month: on the first Friday and last Friday of each month.
  • The applicant must report to the Chief Magistrate’s Court Buganda Road at Kampala on the next date fixed for mention of his case.

Source and reliance status

HC: Criminal Division (Uganda)

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Source document

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

HC: Criminal Division (Uganda)

Judgment

[2007] UGHCCRD 3

THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UGANDA AT KAMPALA

CRIMINAL MISC. CAUSE NO.94 OF 2007 (Arising from Criminal Case No.557 of 2007 at Buganda Road Chief

Magistrate’s Court)

*9*

BETWEEN

HON. DR. ALEX KAMUGISHA;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; : APPLICANT/ACCUSED

VERSUS

UGANDA :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: RESPONDENT/PROSECUTOR

RULING

The Applicant is charged before the Chief Magistrate’s Court with Abuse of Office c/s 87(1) of the Penal Code Act. This offence is only bailable by this Court - see - S.75 (2) of the Magistrate’s Courts Act.

An application such as this one can be made under S.75(4) (b) of the same Act.

This application was made under Article 23 (6) (a) and (b) of the Constitution (1995); and the Trial on Indictments Act. Both Counsel in their submissions referred to SS.14(1) and S. 15(1), (3) and (4) of the TIA. The offence of Abuse of Office is provided for under S. 15(2) (d) of the TIA.

S. 15(1) gives this Court discretion in considering exceptional circumstances.

The Applicant in this case relied on advanced age as an exceptional circumstance under S. 15(3) ( c) of the TIA. To prove his advanced age the Applicant produced a copy of the 1st page of his Passport where it is stated that he was born on 10.7.1948. Counsel for the IGG Mr. Harrison Ahimbisibwe said that he had no comment on that evidence. This Court has repeatedly held that any age above 50 may be considered advanced age.

In Para. 5 of his affidavit, the Applicant deponed that he is aged 58 years.

I hold that the Applicant has proved sufficiently that he is of advanced age.

The Applicant deponed in his affidavit that he is married with a family of 10 children and other dependants. He has a fixed place of abode at Apollo Square in Entebbe. The Prosecution has not produced any evidence that he has ever jumped bail.

There are no other charges pending against him.

He has presented 3 Sureties, namely:

1. Hon. Professor Kasenene - a former Minister of State for Finance.

2. Hon. John Alimpa Kigyagi an MP for Mbarara Municipality.

3. Hon. Chris Baryomunsi - MP for Kinkizi East.

In my view these are substantial Sureties.

I hold that the Applicant has satisfied the requirements of S. 15(3) and (4) of the TIA.

He is a fit and proper person to grant bail.

I hereby grant him bail on the following conditions

1. The Applicant is to enter into a bond with the Registrar (Crime) in an amount of Shs.3 Million not cash, guaranteeing that he will duly attend the Chief Magistrate’s Court to answer the charge Preferred against him.

2. Each of the 3 Sureties presented to Court will also enter into a bond with the Registrar (Crime) in an amount of Shs.5 million Not cash guaranteeing that the Applicant will attend the Chief Magistrate’s Court to answer the charge against him.

3. The Applicant must surrender to the Registrar (Crime) his Passport.

4. The Applicant, after his release on bail, must report to the Registrar (Crime) twice every month: On the first Friday and on the last Friday of every month; 5. The Applicant should report to the Chief Magistrate’s Court Buganda Road at Kampala on the date next fixed for mention of his case.

Order accordingly.

Hon. Justice Moses Mukiibi

JUDGE

25.5.2007

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Constitution of Uganda, Article 23(6)(a) and (b)

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Trial on Indictments Act, Sections 14(1), 15(1), 15(2)(d), 15(3), 15(4)

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Magistrate's Courts Act, Sections 75(2), 75(4)(b)

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Penal Code Act, Section 87(1)

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this JurisAssist collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.