Download

Uganda Judgment

African Commission on Human and Peoples Rights

International Pen v Chad (Communication 55 of 1991) [1995] ACHPR 8 (22 March 1995)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The Commission determined that, since the communication was withdrawn after the release or death of the prisoner concerned, there was no longer a live issue for adjudication. In accordance with Article 114 of the Rules of Procedure and Article 56 of the African Charter, the Commission closed the case as the circumstances giving rise to the complaint had ceased to exist, rendering the communication moot.

Court disposition

case_closed

Orders

  • The case is closed following the withdrawal of the communication.

02

Material facts

Parties

International PEN

Applicant

Republic of Chad

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Communication / Final Decision

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Whether the communication should be closed following the release or death of the prisoner concerned.

Party arguments

Applicant
The applicant alleged false imprisonment of an individual in Chad and sought intervention by the Commission.
Respondent
The respondent did not submit arguments as the communication was withdrawn following the release or death of the prisoner.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Article 114 of the Rules of Procedure; Article 56 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights

    A communication may be closed if the subject matter is resolved or no longer exists, such as by release or death of the prisoner.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The Commission determined that, since the communication was withdrawn after the release or death of the prisoner concerned, there was no longer a live issue for adjudication. In accordance with Article 114 of the Rules of Procedure and Article 56 of the African Charter, the Commission closed the case as the circumstances giving rise to the complaint had ceased to exist, rendering the communication moot.

Court disposition

case_closed

  • The case is closed following the withdrawal of the communication.

Source and reliance status

African Commission on Human and Peoples Rights

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Source document

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

African Commission on Human and Peoples Rights

Judgment

[1995] ACHPR 8

AFRICAN COMMISSION ON HUMAN AND PEOPLES' RIGHTS

INTERNATIONAL PEN v. CHAD

DECISION

Citation: Int'l PEN v. Chad, Comm. 55/91, 7th ACHPR AAR Annex IX (1993-1994) Publications: IHRDA, Compilation of Decisions on Communications of the African Commission On Human and Peoples' Rights Extracted from the Commission's Activity Reports 1994-2001, at 72 (2002); Documents of the African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights, at 346 (Malcolm D. Evans & Rachel Murray eds., 2001); (2000) AHRLR 66 (ACHPR 1994)

COMMUNICATION ON ALLEGED FALSE IMPRISONMENT DATED 27 MARCH 1991

FINAL DECISION

[1] "Following the withdrawal of the communication dated 31 August 1993 following the release or the death of the prisoner concerned, the Commission closes the case." (Article 114 of the Rules of Procedure; Article 56 of the Charter.)

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Article 114 of the Rules of Procedure of the African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Article 56 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this JurisAssist collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.