Share
In the matter of an application for legal guardianship by Kawuma Allen (Miscellaneous Cause 33 of 2020) [2021] UGHCFD 224 (15 March 2021)
- Citation
- [2021] UGHCFD 224
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Uganda
- Court
- HC: Family Division (Uganda)
- Panel
- Okalany, J
- Case number
- Miscellaneous Cause 33 of 2020
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- HC: Family Division (Uganda)
- Panel
- Okalany, J
- Case number
- Miscellaneous Cause 33 of 2020
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The court found that the applicant, as the biological mother and caretaker of the minors, had acted in their best interests and demonstrated intentions to further their welfare by selling the current property and acquiring a more valuable one for their benefit. The evidence showed that the children were healthy, well cared for, and progressing in their education. Although the children were too young to express informed views on the property transaction, the court was satisfied that the applicant’s actions would not prejudice their interests but rather promote their physical, emotional, and educational needs. The legal framework, including the Children Act and the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, requires that the welfare and best interests of the child be paramount in such decisions. The application was therefore allowed, and the applicant was appointed legal guardian for the purposes of managing the property on behalf of the children.
Court disposition
application allowed
Orders
- The applicant, Kawuma Allen, is appointed legal guardian of Owori Malcom Ombudo, Owori Melchizedek Kalenge, and Constance Joyce Manjeri Akello in respect of land comprised in Kyaggwe Block 188, Plot 576 at Nakapinyi, Mukono District, for purposes of assigning, transferring, selling, or transacting in any way for and on behalf of the children.
- No order as to costs.
02
Material facts
Parties
Kawuma Allen
Applicant Counsel: Asasira BoscoOwori Malcom Ombudo
RespondentOwori Melchizedek Kalenge
RespondentConstance Joyce Manjeri Akello
Respondent03
Procedural history
Posture
Miscellaneous Cause / Ruling
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether it is in the best interests of the minors that a guardianship order is granted to the applicant in respect of the property in question.
- 02
Whether the applicant is suitable to be appointed legal guardian for the purpose of managing the children's property.
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The applicant, as the biological mother and caretaker of the minors, seeks appointment as legal guardian to sell the children’s registered land and purchase a more valuable property for their benefit, including constructing commercial houses to generate income for their education and welfare. She asserts that her actions will not compromise but rather promote the children’s welfare.
- Respondent
- No formal respondent opposition was recorded. The children, as minors, were examined by the court but did not express views on the ownership or transaction of the property due to their age and understanding.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Section 3, Children Act Cap 59 as amended
The welfare of the child shall be of paramount consideration whenever a court determines questions regarding the upbringing or administration of the child's property.
- 02
Section 43F(1)(e), Children Act
A court shall, before making a guardianship order, satisfy itself that consideration has been given to the wishes of the child, having regard to the age and understanding of the child.
- 03
Article 3, United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child
Best interests of the child must guide all decisions concerning children.
- 04
Articles 2, 6, 12(2), United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child
Protection of the right to life, survival and development; right to be heard and respect for the views of the child; non-discrimination.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The court found that the applicant, as the biological mother and caretaker of the minors, had acted in their best interests and demonstrated intentions to further their welfare by selling the current property and acquiring a more valuable one for their benefit. The evidence showed that the children were healthy, well cared for, and progressing in their education. Although the children were too young to express informed views on the property transaction, the court was satisfied that the applicant’s actions would not prejudice their interests but rather promote their physical, emotional, and educational needs. The legal framework, including the Children Act and the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, requires that the welfare and best interests of the child be paramount in such decisions. The application was therefore allowed, and the applicant was appointed legal guardian for the purposes of managing the property on behalf of the children.
Obiter and limits
- The children were examined in court and spoke freely, demonstrating that their right to be heard and respect for their views was being upheld, despite their tender age.
- No order is made as to costs, reflecting the welfare-oriented nature of the proceedings.
Court disposition
application allowed
- The applicant, Kawuma Allen, is appointed legal guardian of Owori Malcom Ombudo, Owori Melchizedek Kalenge, and Constance Joyce Manjeri Akello in respect of land comprised in Kyaggwe Block 188, Plot 576 at Nakapinyi, Mukono District, for purposes of assigning, transferring, selling, or transacting in any way for and on behalf of the children.
- No order as to costs.
Source and reliance status
HC: Family Division (Uganda)
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
HC: Family Division (Uganda)
Judgment
THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UGANDA AT KAMPALA
(FAMILY DIVISION)
MISCELLANEOUS CAUSE NO. 0033 OF 2020
IN THE MATTER OF OWORI MALCOM OMBUDO, OWORI MELCHIZEDEK KALENGE AND CONSTANCE JOYCE MAJERI AKELLO (INFANTS)
AND
IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR LEGAL GUARDIANSHIP BY KAWUMA ALLEN (APPLICANT)
BEFORE: HON. JUSTICE SUSAN OKALANY
RULING
INTRODUCTION
1. This is an application brought by way of notice of motion for legal guardianship under Article 139(1) of the 1995 Constitution of the Republic of Uganda, Section 3 of the Children Act, Section 98 of the Civil Procedure Act and Order 5 Rules 1 and 3 of the Civil Procedure Rules. The applicant seeks for the order that:
The Applicant be appointed legal guardian of Owori Malcom Ombudo, Owori Melchizedek Kalenge and Constance Joyce Manjeri Akello in respect of the land and property comprised in Kyaggwe Block 188 Plot 576 at Nakapinyi, in Mukono District.
1. The grounds of the application are set out in the affidavit of the applicant, Kawuma Allen and briefly are that: 2. The children who are minors are the registered proprietors of land comprised in Kyaggwe Block 188 Plot 576 at Nakapinyi; 3. The Applicant wishes to sell, transfer and thereafter purchase another piece of land to build a commercial house and have it registered in the names of the children for their benefit; 4. The Applicant requires an order showing that she has full powers to use the land in the manner aforesaid, for the benefit of the children, which order should include powers to execute all requisite documents that give effect to the guardianship order; and 5. The order if granted shall be for the benefit and welfare of the children.
BACKGROUND
1. According to the applicant in her affidavit in support of the application, she is the biological mother of Owori Malcom Ombudo, Owori Melchizedek Kalenge and Constance Joyce Manjeri Akello, born on 15th August 2009, 14th October 2011 and 26th August 2015 respectively. The minors live under the applicant’s care and are her full responsibility in respect of their general welfare, up keep and education.
2. The children are the registered proprietors for the land comprised in Kyaggwe Block 188 Plot 576 at Nakapinyi in Mukono District, which the applicant intends to sell and later purchase another piece of land adjacent to it, which is in a better location than the children’s land. She also intends to thereafter construct commercial houses for the children and to register the said piece of land in the children’s names, with a purpose of generating income for their education. The applicant additionally states that the land she intends to purchase for the children is more valuable and her actions will in no way compromise the children’s welfare; in fact, it will be for their full benefit and welfare as the grow up.
SUBMISSIONS OF COUNSEL
1. The applicant was represented by Mr. Asasira Bosco. Mr. Asasira in his submissions reiterated the contents of the application. He pointed out that the issue for determination is whether the application has been brought in the best in interests and welfare of the children.
2. In response, counsel cited Section 3 and Paragraph 1(b) of the First Schedule to the Children Act, as well as the case of In Re Sarah Namakula and Alex Katende Miscellaneous Application No. 92 /93, which provide that in making any decision concerning a child, his or her welfare is paramount. He observed that in the instant case, the children are the applicant’s own children as per her affidavit. She had purchased the property in issue and caused its registration in the children’s names as evidenced by Annexure D. She now intended to sell the said property to acquire a better one and develop it for the benefit of the children. Counsel prayed that this court allows the application.
DECISION OF COURT
1. I have considered the application, the submissions of counsel and the law applicable. I do agree that the main issue for determination in this matter is: *Whether it is in the best interests of the minors that a guardianship order is granted to the applicant in respect of the property in question*.
2. The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the child underlines the following principles, as providing guidance on the treatment of Children in all aspects of their lives: 3. Best interest of the child – Article 3; 4. Protection of the right to life, survival and development –Article 6; 5. Right to be heard and respect for the views of the child –Article 12(2); and 6. Non-discrimination -Article 2. 7. Section 3 of the Children Act Cap 59 as amended, states that: “*The welfare of the child shall be of paramount consideration whenever the state, a court, a tribunal, a local authority or any person determines the question in respect to the upbringing of the child, the administration of the child’s property, or the application of any income arising from that administration*”.
8. In determining the suitability of an applicant to be appointed as guardian for a child, the court is additionally, to be guided by Section 43F (1)(e) of the Children Act, which requires that: *A court shall before making a guardianship order, satisfy itself that consideration has been given to the wishes of the child, having regard to the age and understanding of the child, where in the view of the court, the child is able to understand the guardianship proceedings.* 9. It was the applicant’s averment in her affidavit in support of the application that she is the biological mother of the children Owori Malcom Ombudo, Owori Melchizedek Kalenge and Constance Joyce Manjeri Akello. She produced copies of the children’s immunization cards and provisional birth certificates, attached as Annexures A, B and C respectively, as proof of the fact that the children are her children. The applicant further averred that the piece of land comprised in Kyaggwe Block 188 Plot 576, at Nakapinyi – Mukono, is registered in the names of the children Owori Malcom Ombudo, Owori Melchizedek Kalenge and Constance Joyce Manjeri Akello. A copy of the certificate of title of the said land was attached to the applicant’s affidavit as Annexure D. 10. At the hearing of this application, I examined the children, to ascertain their views and feelings on the matter. Owori Malcom Ombudo stated that he
was 11 years old at the time of hearing of this application. He mentioned that the applicant is his mother, while his father Owori Davis Jeremiah Okoth is a chef who works in the USA. It was his statement that his family lives in Namuwongo – Kisugu in Kampala. He and his brother Melchizedek Owori Kalenge attend school at Mirembe Junior School, studying in primary 5 and 3 respectively, while his sister Constance Joyce Manjeri Akello goes to Queen Ann Nursery School and is in top class. His mother is a teacher in Queen Ann Nursery and Primary school. He stopped going to school last year because of the coronavirus pandemic. It was his testimony that his family’s origin is Tororo District, in a place called Kidera. That his family lives together with their grandfather Owori Kalenge Ombudo, aunt Owori Dora and uncle Owori Jacob.
11. The testimonies of Owori Melchizedek Kalenge (9 years) and Constance Joyce Manjeri Akello (5 years) are similar in effect to what Owori Malcom Ombudo stated in court.
12. None of the children knew why they were in court or who owns the land comprised in Kyaggwe Block 188 Plot 576. Their wishes in that regard thus, could not be established. However, from my examination and observation of the children during the hearing of the application, I concluded that the applicant has so far, acted in the best interest of the children; protected their right to life, survival and development, since the said children are not only physically and emotionally healthy, but were progressing well with their education before the COVID19 pandemic. Their right to be heard and respect for their views is apparently being respected too, since they spoke freely with me, answering my questions accurately and without exhibiting any fear, their tender age notwithstanding.
13. I thus believe that the intentions of the applicant in selling the land comprised in Kyaggwe Block 188 Plot 576 at Nakapinyi, in Mukono District, registered in the names of the children and in purchasing another piece of land in order to construct a commercial house for the children thereon, is in the best interest of the children, as the applicant intends to apply the proceeds from the commercial house for the welfare of the children. I find that appointing the applicant, as legal guardian of the children, to enable her sell the land comprised in Kyaggwe Block 188 Plot 576 at Nakapinyi - Mukono District, on their behalf, will not prejudice their best interests, but will in fact promote their physical, emotional, and educational needs. It is my considered opinion therefore that this application was brought with the best interests of the children in mind.
14. In the result, I allow it and order as follows: 15. The Applicant is appointed legal guardian of Owori Malcom Ombudo, Owori Melchizedek Kalenge and Constance Joyce Manjeri Akello in respect of land comprised in Kyaggwe Block 188, Plot 576 at Nakapinyi, in Mukono District, for purposes of assigning, transferring, selling or transacting in any way, for and on behalf of the children; and 16. No order is made as to costs.
I so order.
Susan Okalany
JUDGE
15th March, 2021
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.