Download

Uganda Judgment

HC: Family Division (Uganda)

In Re: Tamale Joshua & Ors (Miscellaneous Cause No. 88 of 2017) [2018] UGHCFD 16 (19 April 2018)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The High Court has jurisdiction to determine applications for legal guardianship under the Constitution, Judicature Act, and Civil Procedure Act. The applicant, who is the biological father and caretaker of the minors, purchased and registered land in the names of the children and their mother. The application seeks legal guardianship to enable the applicant to manage and administer the property, including securing a loan to construct rentals for the children's welfare. The court found that the minors, being underage, cannot contract or secure loans, and the applicant's actions are in their best interests. The application is supported by the biological mother and is consistent with the paramount consideration of child welfare as mandated by the Children Act and relevant case law. The court therefore granted the application for legal guardianship to the applicant for the specified purposes.

Court disposition

application granted

Orders

  • Legal guardianship of Tamale Joshua, Kawuki Joel, and Tyaba Jonathan Francis is granted to Ssentongo Edward Francis in respect of managing and administering the land comprised in Kyadondo Block 180, Plot 12140 at Namugongo.
  • The order of legal guardianship is solely for the welfare of the children Tamale Joshua, Kawuki Joel, and Tyaba Jonathan Francis.
  • The applicant shall bear the costs of this application.

02

Material facts

Parties

Ssentongo Edward Francis

Applicant Counsel: Bumpenje Christopher

Tamale Joshua

Respondent

Kawuki Joel

Respondent

Tyaba Jonathan Francis

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Legal Guardianship

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The applicant has custody of the minors, caters for all their needs, and registered the land in the names of the children and their mother. He seeks legal guardianship to secure a loan for constructing rentals to benefit the children, as the minors cannot contract or secure loans themselves. The application is supported by the biological mother.
Respondent
The biological mother, Ms. Semanda, supports the application and confirms the applicant's role in purchasing and registering the land for the children. No opposition is recorded from any party.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Section 1(i), Section 3, and Schedule 1 of the Children Act, Cap 59

    The welfare of the child is the paramount consideration in all matters concerning children.

  2. 02

    Article 139 of the Constitution of Uganda 1995; Section 14 of the Judicature Act Cap 13; Section 98 of the Civil Procedure Act Cap 71

    The High Court has jurisdiction to entertain applications for legal guardianship.

  3. 03

    Joyce Deborah Alitubera and in the matter of Richard Masaba CA No 70 & 81 of 2011

    Courts have fortified the principle of child welfare in legal guardianship matters.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The High Court has jurisdiction to determine applications for legal guardianship under the Constitution, Judicature Act, and Civil Procedure Act. The applicant, who is the biological father and caretaker of the minors, purchased and registered land in the names of the children and their mother. The application seeks legal guardianship to enable the applicant to manage and administer the property, including securing a loan to construct rentals for the children's welfare. The court found that the minors, being underage, cannot contract or secure loans, and the applicant's actions are in their best interests. The application is supported by the biological mother and is consistent with the paramount consideration of child welfare as mandated by the Children Act and relevant case law. The court therefore granted the application for legal guardianship to the applicant for the specified purposes.

Obiter and limits

  • The welfare of the children remains the paramount consideration in all decisions concerning their property and upbringing.
  • The applicant's intention to add value to the land by constructing rentals is in the best interests of the children.

Court disposition

application granted

  • Legal guardianship of Tamale Joshua, Kawuki Joel, and Tyaba Jonathan Francis is granted to Ssentongo Edward Francis in respect of managing and administering the land comprised in Kyadondo Block 180, Plot 12140 at Namugongo.
  • The order of legal guardianship is solely for the welfare of the children Tamale Joshua, Kawuki Joel, and Tyaba Jonathan Francis.
  • The applicant shall bear the costs of this application.

Source and reliance status

HC: Family Division (Uganda)

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Source document

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

HC: Family Division (Uganda)

Judgment

[2018] UGHCFD 16

THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA IN THE HIGH COURT OF UGANDA HOLDEN AT KAMPALA [FAMILY DIVISION] HCT-00-FD-FC- NO – 88 OF 2017 5 IN THE MATTER OF TAMALE JOSHUA, KAWUKI JOEL, AND TYABA JONATHAN FRANCIS AND IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR LEGAL GUARDIANSHIP BY SSENTOGO EDWARD FRANCIS

BEFORE: HON. LADY JUSTICE KETRAH KITARIISIBWA KATUNGUKA

RULING

- 15 This is an application for Legal Guardianship brought under Article 139 of the Constitution of the Republic of Uganda 1995, Section 14 of the Judicature Act Cap 13, Sections 1 and 3 and Schedule 1 of the Children Act Cap 59, and Section 98 of the Civil Procedure Act Cap 71 for orders that; - i) Legal guardianship of Tamale Joshua, Kawuki Joel and Tyaba Jonathan is 20 granted to Ssentongo Edward Francis in respect of creating, managing and administering the land comprised in Kyadondo Block 180, Plot 12140 at Namugongo. - ii) The applicant be appointed legal guardian in respect of the education and planning needs of Tamale Joshua, Kawuki Joel and Tyaba Jonathan 25 Francis.

The Application is supported by affidavit of the applicant. The Birth certificate of the children and the title deed which is in the name of Shanon Semanda, the biological mother of the minors and the names of Tamale Joshua, Kawuki Joel and

30 Tyaba Jonathan Francis the minors, are attached.

The grounds of the application are contained in the affidavit of the applicant but briefly are that; the applicant has custody of the minors and he caters for all their needs; the applicant is the one who registered the land into the names of the children and their mother; the applicant wishes to secure a loan to construct rentals to cater for the needs of the children.

The applicant is represented by Counsel Bumpenje Christopher, who submitted that 5 the application is specifically for the welfare of the children.

Mr. Ssentongo, the applicant testified on Oath that the children stay with him and that according to an agreement for the purchase of the land in question, he bought it. This was confirmed by Ms Semanda the mother of the minors.

Decision of Court

I have carefully considered the application the affidavit in support, the copy of the title deed, the birth certificates attached, I have also listened to the testimony of the applicant and Ms. Semanda biological mother to the minors; the facts are that the

- 15 applicant bought land and registered it in the names of Semanda Shanon and the minors Tamale Joshua, Kawuki Joel and Tyaba Jouathan. All children of the applicant; that applicant takes care of the children's needs including school fees as per respect of Joshua Tamale and Joel Kawuke, that the mortgage the property for building loan for rentals for the welfare of the children. The application is supported - 20 by the biological mother of the children who is also the joint registered proprietor together with the children.

The issues for resolution are;

- (i) Whether this court has jurisdiction. - 25 (ii) Whether the application should be granted.

Issue 1

Whether this court has jurisdiction to entertain this matter

Article 139 of the Constitution of the Republic of Uganda 1995, Section 98 of the Civil Procedure Act Cap 71 and Section 14 of the Judicature Act Cap 13 give this 5 court powers to entertain applications of this nature. This court therefore has

jurisdiction to entertain this application.

Issue 2

Whether this Application should be granted

I therefore, make the following orders.

- Section 1(i) and Section 3 and the 1st 10 schedule to the Children Act, Cap 59 provide that in addressing issues concerning children their welfare is the paramount consideration. Courts have fortified this in the case of Joyce Deborah Alitubera and in the matter of Richard Masaba CA No 70 & 81 of 2011. - 15 The Applicant bought the land for the children in their best interests; he intends to add value to the land by constructing rentals still in the interest of the children; the children are not able to secure the loan because they are minors and cannot contract; and they would be unable to pay the loan which the applicant is able to pay. This court is convinced that the application is the best interests of the children and 20 therefore should be granted.

In summary this court is seized with jurisdiction to entertain this matter, and the application is in the best interests of the minors,

25 (i) An Order for the Legal Guardianship, Tamale Joshua, Kawuki Joel and Tyaba Jonathan Francis is granted to Sentongo Edward Francis in respect of managing and administering the land comprised in Kyadondo 185 plot 12140, land at Namugongo.

(ii)The Order of Legal guardianship as detailed shall be solely for the welfare of the children Tamale Joshua, Kawuki Joel and Tyaba Jonathan Francis. (iii)The applicant shall bear the costs of this application.

KETRAH KITARIISIBWA KATUNGUKA JUDGE 19/4/2018

5

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Joyce Deborah Alitubera and in the matter of Richard Masaba CA No 70 & 81 of 2011

Case cited

Article 139 of the Constitution of the Republic of Uganda 1995

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Section 14 of the Judicature Act Cap 13

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Sections 1 and 3 and Schedule 1 of the Children Act Cap 59

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Section 98 of the Civil Procedure Act Cap 71

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this JurisAssist collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.