Share
In Re: Nico Ltd (MISC. APPLICATION NO. 33 OF 1995) [1995] UGHCCD 6 (30 October 1995)
- Citation
- [1995] UGHCCD 6
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Uganda
- Court
- HC: Civil Division (Uganda)
- Panel
- Kato, J
- Case number
- MISC. APPLICATION NO. 33 OF 1995
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- HC: Civil Division (Uganda)
- Panel
- Kato, J
- Case number
- MISC. APPLICATION NO. 33 OF 1995
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The court found that the applicants, as administrators of the estate of a former shareholder and director, are entitled to be registered as shareholders and directors of NICO Ltd. The absence of opposition and the equitable necessity for continued management justified rectification of the register. The court relied on statutory provisions and relevant case law to conclude that the applicants should be allowed to call and hold a general meeting and act as directors, ensuring the company's affairs are properly managed.
Court disposition
application_granted
Orders
- The company register shall be rectified by registering Kakaire Kirunda and Rehema Kyabwe as shareholders of NICO Ltd.
- The applicants shall constitute a quorum for a general meeting and may act as directors of NICO Ltd.
- The costs of the application shall be met from the company's assets.
02
Material facts
Parties
Kakaire Kirunda
Applicant Counsel: Mr. MasigaRehema Kyabwe
Applicant Counsel: Mr. MasigaNICO Ltd
Respondent03
Procedural history
Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the register of members and directors of NICO Ltd should be rectified to include the applicants as shareholders and directors.
- 02
Whether the applicants are entitled to call and hold a general meeting of NICO Ltd.
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The applicants, having obtained letters of administration for the estate of Alimansi Menya Kirunda, seek rectification of the company register to be recognized as shareholders and directors of NICO Ltd. They argue that this is necessary for the continued management of the company and rely on the precedent set in In the matter of Kasita Estate Ltd (1982) HCB 107.
- Respondent
- No respondent appeared or filed arguments in opposition to the application.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Sections 118 and 135 of the Companies Act
The court may order rectification of the company register where it is equitable and in the interests of proper management.
- 02
In the matter of Kasita Estate Ltd (1982) HCB 107
Precedent supports rectification where the applicants are entitled to the shares by succession and for the effective management of the company.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The court found that the applicants, as administrators of the estate of a former shareholder and director, are entitled to be registered as shareholders and directors of NICO Ltd. The absence of opposition and the equitable necessity for continued management justified rectification of the register. The court relied on statutory provisions and relevant case law to conclude that the applicants should be allowed to call and hold a general meeting and act as directors, ensuring the company's affairs are properly managed.
Obiter and limits
- It is equitable and in the interests of the management of NICO Ltd to have the applicants registered as members or shareholders.
- The applicants shall constitute a quorum for a general meeting and may act as directors of the company.
Court disposition
application_granted
- The company register shall be rectified by registering Kakaire Kirunda and Rehema Kyabwe as shareholders of NICO Ltd.
- The applicants shall constitute a quorum for a general meeting and may act as directors of NICO Ltd.
- The costs of the application shall be met from the company's assets.
Source and reliance status
HC: Civil Division (Uganda)
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
HC: Civil Division (Uganda)
Judgment
THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA IN THE HIGH COURT OF UGANDA AT JINJA
MISC. APPLICATION NO. 33 OF 1995
IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES ACT
AND
IN THE MATTER OF NICO LTD
AND
IN THE MATTER OF APPLICATION BY:
1. KAKAIRE KIRUNDA
2. REHEMA KYABWE
FOR RECTIFICATION OF THE COMPANIES REGISTER BEFORE: THE HON. JUSTICE C. M. KATO
RULING
This is an application by exparte chamber summons dated 4-9-95, it was made under the provisions of sections 118 and 135 of the Companies Act and Order 34A rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules. By their application the two applicants: Kakaire Kirunda and Rehema Kyabwe are asking the court to make an order rectifying the register of members and directors of a company known as NICO Ltd so that these two applicants are registered as share holders and directors of that company. They are also asking this court to allow them to call for and hold a general meeting of that company.
The back ground of this application is rather interesting as may be seen from the facts as outlined below. According to the affidavits of the two applicants and according to the chamber summons sometime on 25-10-78 a company known as NICO Ltd was incorporated by two men Ausi Kirunda and Leo Semakula who were the only shareholders of the company. On 16-12-78 Ausi Kirunda died, in the same year (1978) Leo Senakula disappeared and has never been heard of ever since. Alimansi Menya Kirunda took out letters of administration in respect of the estate of Ausi Kirunda and he continued to work as the director of NICO Ltd. Later on Alimansi Menya Kirunda also died and the present applicants obtained letters of administration for
the estate of Alimansi Menya Kirunda.
It is with this back ground in mind that the two applicants want the register rectified so that they continue managing the company, they being now the shareholders in place of Ausi Kirunda who was later replaced by Alimansi Menya Kirunda on the latter's demise.
$-2-$
Mr. Masiga who appeared for the two applicants argued that this was a proper case to have the register rectified and he relied on the case of: In the matter of Kasita Estate Itd (1982)HCB 107.
I have carefully considered the matter and I am satisfied with the contents of the affidavits of the two applicants and I find that it is equitable and in the interests of the management of NICO Ltd to have the two applicants registered as members or shareholders of that company and to permit them to call the general meeting of that company. The application is accordingly granted and it is hereby ordered that the company register be rectified by registering the two applicants Kakaire Kirunda and Rehena Kyabwe as shareholders of that company. It is further ordered that the two applicants shall constitute a quorum for a general meeting and may act as directors of that company. The costs of this application shall be met from the company's assets. So I order. (The case of: In the matter of Kasita Estate Ltd (1982) HCB 107 followed)
> C. M. KATO JUDGE $30 - 10 - 95$
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.