Download

Uganda Judgment

HC: Family Division (Uganda)

In Re: Muyingo & Ors (infants) (Family Cause 299 of 2013) [2014] UGHCFD 22 (11 April 2014)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The court found that the three children are total orphans, their relatives are unable or unwilling to provide permanent care, and the Extended Family Support Organization cannot offer a permanent home. The applicants, a married couple vetted and found suitable by welfare authorities in their home country, are willing and able to provide a loving, stable family environment. The court emphasized the best interests of the children as the paramount consideration, noting that granting legal guardianship to the applicants would allow the children to grow up together as siblings in a stable home, with access to education, healthcare, and other basic needs. The court also found that the applicants meet all legal requirements for guardianship under Ugandan law and that permitting them to immigrate with the children to the USA is in the children's best interests. Accordingly, the application for legal guardianship was granted, with conditions to ensure ongoing welfare monitoring.

Court disposition

application granted

Orders

  • James Todd Figueroa and Nicole Theresa Figueroa are granted legal guardianship of Joshua Muyingo, Steven Katongole, and Henry Kakooza.
  • The legal guardians are permitted to immigrate with the children to the United States of America.
  • The legal guardians are directed to obtain Ugandan passports for the three children using their current names.
  • The legal guardians shall submit once a year, photographs and a report on the state of health, progress and welfare of each of the three children to the Registrar, Family Division of the High Court of Uganda at Kampala until each attains 18 years of age or until directed otherwise.
  • The Registrar of the High Court shall furnish a copy of the orders, together with the address of the legal guardians in USA, to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Uganda, the Embassy of USA in Kampala, and the Ministry of Justice and Constitutional Affairs of Uganda.
  • The legal guardians shall immediately communicate any changes of addresses to the authorities mentioned above.
  • Costs of this application will be met by the applicants.

02

Material facts

Parties

James Todd Figueroa

Applicant Counsel: Ekirapa Isaac

Nicole Theresa Figueroa

Applicant Counsel: Ekirapa Isaac

Joshua Muyingo

Respondent

Steven Katongole

Respondent

Henry Kakooza

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Family Cause / Ruling on Application for Legal Guardianship

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The applicants argued that the children are orphans in need of care and protection, that their relatives are unable to provide for them, and that the applicants are willing and able to provide a loving, stable family environment. They have been vetted and found suitable by welfare authorities in their country of origin. Granting guardianship and allowing relocation to the USA is in the best interests of the children.
Respondent
No formal opposition was recorded. The children, through examination by the court, expressed understanding and willingness to join the applicants' family. The Extended Family Support Organization confirmed it cannot provide a permanent home for the children.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Article 34 of the Constitution of Uganda; Section 3 of the Children Act

    The best interests of the child shall be the primary consideration in all matters concerning children.

  2. 02

    Article 139(1) of the Constitution; Section 14 of the Judicature Act; Section 98 of the Civil Procedure Act

    The High Court has unlimited original jurisdiction in all matters and may grant remedies where there are no specific statutory provisions.

  3. 03

    Section 2 of the Children Act; Nabyama Moses alias Nabyama Abasa Family Cause No. 76/2011

    A guardian is a person having parental responsibility for a child and must be able to provide care, welfare, and protection for the child.

  4. 04

    Section 3 and First Schedule to the Children Act

    The welfare principle requires that the court considers the child's wishes, needs, background, and the likely effects of any change in circumstances.

  5. 05

    Deborah Joyce Alitubeera & Richard Masaba Civil Appeals No. 70 & 81/2011

    Applicants may be permitted to immigrate with children if it is in the best interests of the child.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The court found that the three children are total orphans, their relatives are unable or unwilling to provide permanent care, and the Extended Family Support Organization cannot offer a permanent home. The applicants, a married couple vetted and found suitable by welfare authorities in their home country, are willing and able to provide a loving, stable family environment. The court emphasized the best interests of the children as the paramount consideration, noting that granting legal guardianship to the applicants would allow the children to grow up together as siblings in a stable home, with access to education, healthcare, and other basic needs. The court also found that the applicants meet all legal requirements for guardianship under Ugandan law and that permitting them to immigrate with the children to the USA is in the children's best interests. Accordingly, the application for legal guardianship was granted, with conditions to ensure ongoing welfare monitoring.

Obiter and limits

  • The Children Act does not specifically provide for guardianship orders, but the High Court's inherent jurisdiction allows it to grant such remedies in the best interests of the child.
  • It is a blessing, and in the children’s best interests, that all the three children will continue to live as one family as siblings under the legal guardianship of the applicants who are a married couple with children.
  • Denying the applicants to look after the three children would deprive the children of the available opportunity of being in a home where each is loved and parented.

Court disposition

application granted

  • James Todd Figueroa and Nicole Theresa Figueroa are granted legal guardianship of Joshua Muyingo, Steven Katongole, and Henry Kakooza.
  • The legal guardians are permitted to immigrate with the children to the United States of America.
  • The legal guardians are directed to obtain Ugandan passports for the three children using their current names.
  • The legal guardians shall submit once a year, photographs and a report on the state of health, progress and welfare of each of the three children to the Registrar, Family Division of the High Court of Uganda at Kampala until each attains 18 years of age or until directed otherwise.
  • The Registrar of the High Court shall furnish a copy of the orders, together with the address of the legal guardians in USA, to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Uganda, the Embassy of USA in Kampala, and the Ministry of Justice and Constitutional Affairs of Uganda.
  • The legal guardians shall immediately communicate any changes of addresses to the authorities mentioned above.
  • Costs of this application will be met by the applicants.

Source and reliance status

HC: Family Division (Uganda)

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Source document

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

HC: Family Division (Uganda)

Judgment

[2014] UGHCFD 22

THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UGANDA AT KAMPALA

FAMILY DIVISION

FAMILY CAUSE 299 OF 2013

IN THE MATTER OF JOSHUA MUYINGO STEVEN KATONGOLE AND HENRY KAKOOZA (CHILDREN)

AND

IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR A LEGAL GUARDIANSHIP ORDER BY JAMES TODD FIGUEROA AND NICOLE THERESA FIGUEROA

BEFORE LADY JUSTICE PERCY NIGHT TUHAISE

RULING

This is an application for legal guardianship brought by notice of motion under articles 139(1) and 34(1) & (2) of the Constitution; section 14 of the Judicature Act, cap 13; sections 2, 3, 4, 5 & 6 of the Children Act cap 59, section 98 of the Civil Procedure Act cap 71 and Order 52 rules 1 & 3 of the Civil Procedure Rules. The applicants are seeking the following orders:-

1. The applicants be granted legal guardianship of the children Joshua Muyingo, Steven Katongole and Henry Kakooza with full parental rights and responsibilities.

2. Consequent to being appointed the legal guardians of the children, the applicants be at liberty to obtain Ugandan passports for the children and be permitted to immigrate with the children to the United States of America where the applicants reside in order to provide parental guidance and cater for the children’s education, guidance, shelter, clothing, medical needs, maintenance, and other basic necessities of life.

3. Costs of this application be provided for.

The grounds of the application are that:-

1. The children are orphans, their parents being deceased.

2. The children being in need of care and protection were committed to the care of Extended Family Ministries.

3. The applicants are ready and willing to provide the children with love, warmth and a healthy family environment.

4. The applicants have been found to be suitable adoptive parents by probation and welfare officers in their country of origin.

5. It is in the best interests of the children that the applicants be granted legal guardianship over them.

The application is supported by the affidavits of the applicants and of Kalungi Faith, Kananura Deus and Hamala Juliet. Learned Counsel Ekirapa Isaac submitted that the children are in need of care, that the applicants are ready and willing to give the children a home to ensure their basic needs are met, and that this is in their best interests.

The Children Act does not specifically provide for guardianship orders. However, article 139(1) of the Constitution and section 14 of the Judicature Act, cap 13, give the High Court unlimited original jurisdiction in all matters. Section 98 of the Civil Procedure Act empowers the High Court to invoke its inherent powers to grant remedies where there are no specific provisions. In all matters concerning children, the best interests of the child shall be the primary consideration. This is a legal principle contained in Article 34 of the Constitution and the Children Act, as well as in various international conventions ratified by Uganda concerning the rights of children.

Section 3 of the Children Act, read with the first schedule to the same Act, sets out guiding principles in making decisions relating to children. Court shall have regard to the ascertainable wishes and feelings of the child in light of his or her age and understanding; the child’s physical, emotional and educational needs; the likely effects of any changes in the child’s circumstances; the child’s age, background and other circumstances relevant in the matter; any harm that the child has suffered or is at the risk of suffering; and, where relevant, the capacity of the child’s parents, guardians or others involved in meeting his or her needs.

The Children Act defines “guardian” to mean a person having parental responsibility for a child. It was stated in *Nabyama Moses alias Nabyama Abasa Family Cause No. 76/2011*that a guardian must be a person who is ready to place himself/herself, in relation to the child, in *loco parentis* for purposes of its care and welfare. A guardian should have the child in his/her charge and actually look after it. A guardian should be able to exercise powers of control over the child. A guardian should ensure that the physical well being of the child is cared for, and that its legal rights are protected. A guardian should be a person who can reasonably be expected to take whatever action may be necessary or desirable on behalf of an infant.

The applicants also pray to obtain Ugandan passports for the children and to immigrate with them to United States of America (USA) where they reside, in order to fulfill their parental responsibilities. The Court of Appeal in *Deborah Joyce Alitubeera & Richard Masaba Civil Appeals No. 70 & 81/2011*, when addressing a similar situation, emphasized the importance of the welfare principle and the need for applicants to travel with the children to their home countries.

Theevidence on record shows thatthe three children are siblings. They were born to Byakwaga James, and Nakatte Atuhiire who are both deceased. Muyingo Joshua was born on 3rd January 2007. Katongole Steven was born on 28th December 2008. Kakooza Henry was born on 11th June 2010. Their father died in a motor accident on 12th October 2010. Their mother fell sick and later died on 20th December 2010. After that the children first lived in Mbarara with their maternal aunt Midias but later relocated to their paternal aunt Faith Kalungi. Their other relatives have financial constraints and personal commitments and cannot afford to take care of them. The children were eventually admitted to Extended Family Support Organization, a community based organization for support. This court examined two of the children, Muyingo Joshua and Katongole Steven, after determining them to be of a fairly understanding age. They informed this court that they appreciate that they will join the applicants’ family, and they had no regrets about it.

It is evident Muyingo Joshua, aged 7 years, Katongole Steven, aged 6 years, and Kakooza Henry, aged 4 years, are in need of a family to grow in and be cared for. They are total orphans. The Extended Family Support Organization is currently only providing support for the three children. It cannot provide a permanent home for them. The organization does not even have an approved home and their registration certificate indicates they carry out development activities. The director of the institution Hamala Juliet testified to this court that they do not live with the children. Muyingo Joshua stated to court that he lives with another mother who is not the real mother. This portrays their state of homelessness.

The applicants desire to parent the children. They are American citizens and a married couple. They have two children. They have been found to be suitable parents by M/S Hawaii International Child whose home study on them is annexed to the 1st applicant’s affidavit as F and G. James Todd Figueroa is an Equipment Operator 2nd Class (EO2) with the United States Navy. Nicole Theresa Figueroa is a stay at home mom looking after their two children. The reports from the State Police of Hawaii and the Federal Bureau of Investigations, annexed to the applicants’ affidavits as H and M respectively reveal that the applicants have no criminal record. They are portrayed by the medical reports annexed to their respective affidavits as I and N to be healthy. The home study states that they have the requirements to take on the three children regarding their age, length of marriage, household, financial status, health, and ability to parent, among other requirements.

I find that where the three children, who are siblings, are total orphans, and where the said children’s relatives are unable to care for them, or are showing no interest in availing them a permanent home, the applicants are the next best suited persons to lookafter them. It is a blessing, and in the children’s best interests, that all the three children will continue to live as one family as siblings under the legal guardianship of the applicants who are a married couple with children.

The applicants meet the requirements of legal guardianship. Denying them to look after the three children would deprive the children of the available opportunity of being in a home where each is loved and parented. The children are clearly vulnerable and they need a home to grow up in. This is a proper case where, through a guardianship order, the three children will get a home, love, care and basic needs. It will be in their best interests to allow this application if the three children are to enjoy the said basic needs permanently in the course of their growing up.

I accordingly make the following orders on terms I consider fit for the welfare of the two children:-

1. James Todd Figueroa and Nicole Theresa Figueroaare granted legal guardianship of the children Joshua Muyingo, Steven Katongole and Henry Kakooza.

2. The legal guardians are permitted to immigrate with the children to the United States of America where the applicants reside in order to fulfill their parental responsibilities.

3. The legal guardians are directed to obtain Ugandan passports for the three children using their current names.

4. The legal guardians shall submit once a year, photographs and a report on the state of health, progress and welfare of each of the three children to the Registrar, Family Division of the High Court of Uganda at Kampala until each attains 18 (eighteen) years of age or until directed otherwise.

5. The Registrar of the High Court shall furnish a copy of the orders in this ruling, together with the address of the legal guardians in USA to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Uganda at Kampala; the Embassy of USA in Kampala; and the Ministry of Justice and Constitutional Affairs of Uganda.

6. The legal guardians shall immediately communicate any changes of addresses to the authorities mentioned above.

7. Costs of this application will be met by the applicants.

Dated at Kampala this 11th day of April 2014.

Percy Night Tuhaise

Judge.

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Nabyama Moses alias Nabyama Abasa Family Cause No. 76/2011

Case cited

Deborah Joyce Alitubeera & Richard Masaba Civil Appeals No. 70 & 81/2011

Case cited

Constitution of the Republic of Uganda, Article 139(1), Article 34(1) & (2)

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Judicature Act, Cap 13, Section 14

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Children Act, Cap 59, Sections 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Civil Procedure Act, Cap 71, Section 98

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Civil Procedure Rules, Order 52 rules 1 & 3

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this JurisAssist collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.