Download

Uganda Judgment

HC: Family Division (Uganda)

In Re: Gavin Terry Kaggwa & Ors (Misc. Cause No. 20 of 2016) [2017] UGHCFD 17 (14 August 2017)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The High Court has jurisdiction to hear and determine applications for guardianship orders under the Children Act. The welfare principle requires that the best interests of the children be the paramount consideration. Given that the children's father died intestate, none of the mothers were legally married to him, and the estate is at risk of being wasted, it is in the best interests of the children for the applicants to be appointed as legal guardians. This appointment will enable them to pursue rights accruing to the minors, including the administration of their late father's estate, and ensure the protection and welfare of the children.

Court disposition

Guardianship order granted.

Orders

  • A guardianship order is granted to Kirabo Annet and Busingye Kellen for Gavin Terry Kaggwa, Tatiana Desire Kaggwa, Daniela Daisy Kaggwa, Dion Denise Kaggwa, Trevor Ox Kaggwa, and Lunkuse Deborah.

02

Material facts

Parties

Kirabo Annet

Applicant

Busingye Kellen

Applicant

Namugaya Caroline

Respondent

Mutesi Erina

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Miscellaneous Application / Ruling

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The applicants, biological mothers of some of the minors, seek legal guardianship to obtain authority to file for letters of administration for the estate of the deceased father, Alex Kaggwa. They argue that none of the mothers were legally married to the deceased, and the estate is being tampered with. They assert that their appointment as guardians is necessary to protect the interests and welfare of all the children.
Respondent
Namugaya Caroline and Mutesi Erina, mothers of the other minors, appeared in court and confirmed their support for the application through statutory declarations, affirming that the applicants should be appointed guardians.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Article 139 of the Constitution of Uganda; Section 14 of the Judicature Act

    The High Court has unlimited original jurisdiction in all matters, including guardianship applications.

  2. 02

    Section 3 of the Children Act, Cap 59

    The welfare principle is paramount in decisions relating to children; the court must consider the best interests of the child.

  3. 03

    Section 1 of the Children Act, Cap 59

    A guardian is a person with parental responsibility, which includes rights, duties, powers, and authority to protect property rights and care for the child's welfare.

  4. 04

    Re Francis Palmer (2007) HCB 99

    The High Court has jurisdiction to entertain applications for guardianship orders.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The High Court has jurisdiction to hear and determine applications for guardianship orders under the Children Act. The welfare principle requires that the best interests of the children be the paramount consideration. Given that the children's father died intestate, none of the mothers were legally married to him, and the estate is at risk of being wasted, it is in the best interests of the children for the applicants to be appointed as legal guardians. This appointment will enable them to pursue rights accruing to the minors, including the administration of their late father's estate, and ensure the protection and welfare of the children.

Court disposition

Guardianship order granted.

  • A guardianship order is granted to Kirabo Annet and Busingye Kellen for Gavin Terry Kaggwa, Tatiana Desire Kaggwa, Daniela Daisy Kaggwa, Dion Denise Kaggwa, Trevor Ox Kaggwa, and Lunkuse Deborah.

Source and reliance status

HC: Family Division (Uganda)

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Source document

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

HC: Family Division (Uganda)

Judgment

[2017] UGHCFD 17

THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UGANDA AT JINJA MISC. CAUSE No. 20 OF 2016

AND

IN THE MATTER OF THE CHILDREN'S ACT, CAP 59

AND

IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR A GUARDIANSHIP ORDER BY KIRABO ANNET AND BUSINGYE KELLEN (MOTHERS)

AND

IN THE MATTER OF GAVIN TERRY KAGGWA AGED 13 YEARS, TATIANA DESIRE KAGGWA AGED 11 YEARS, DANIELA DAISY KAGGWA AGED 9 YEARS, DION DENISE KAGGWA AGED 7 YEARS, TREVOR OX KAGGWA AGED 4 YEARS and LUNKUSE DEBORAH AGED 8 YEARS

BEFORE: HON. JUSTICE MICHAEL ELUBU

RULING

$\mathbf{1}$

The Applicants KIRABO ANNET and BUSINGYE KELLEN bring this cause for orders that they be appointed legal guardians of:

1. GAVIN TERRY KAGGWA AGRED 13 YEARS

2. TATIANA DESIRE KAGGWA AGED 11 YEARS

AGED 9 YEARS 3. DANIELA DAISY KAGGWA

4. DION DENISE KAGGWA AGED 7 YEARS

AGED 4 YEARS TREVOR OX KAGGWA

AGED 8 YEARS 6. LUNKUSE DEBORAH

The background to this matter is that all the six minors are the children of one Alex Kaggwa who died intestate on the 08<sup>th</sup> day of July 2015.

At his death or so soon thereafter the deceased father's sisters are alleged to have descended on his property and started disposing of it before Letters of administration had been issued by this court.

The applicants here are biological mothers of three of the minors, that is, Kirabo Annet is mother to Daniela Daisy Kaggwa and Don Denise Kaggwa while Busingye Kellen is Deborah Lunkuse's mother.

One Namugaya Caroline is the biological Mother of Gavin Terry Kaggwa and Desire Denise Kaggwa. Mutesi Erina is Trevor Ox Kaggwa's mother.

The reason the applicants lodged this application was to obtain the legal authority to file for letters of administration considering that none of them was legally married to the deceased Alex Kaggwa.

Namugaya Caroline and Mutesi Erina were both in court at the bearing and confirmed the contents of their respective statutory declarations where they had affirmed that each supports this application.

The first issue this court will resolve is whether it had jurisdiction to hear and determine this application.

Art 139 of The Constitution of The Republic of Uganda confers upon this court unlimited original jurisdiction in all matters. S.14 of The Judicature Act operationalises Art 139 of The Constitution. In Re Francis Palmer (2007) HCB 99 the Court of Appeal

$\mathsf{2}$

held that the High Court has the jurisdiction to entertain applications for guardianship orders. I therefore find that this court has the jurisdiction to entertain this application.

Secondly the court shall consider whether a grant would be in the best interest of the children?

In determining the best interest of the children in this matter I was guided by S.3 of The Children Act which enjoins court to consider the welfare principle and children's rights when making any decision relating to the child.

The welfare principle is the paramount consideration whenever court is determining any question with respect to the upbringing of the child.

In the instant case the children's father died intestate and none of the mothers of the children here were legally married to the deceased. It is alleged farther that the estate has been tampered with or wasted. It is the prayer of two of the two applicant mothers, that they represent the interests of all the children by their appointment as guardians.

Under S.1 of The Children's Act Cap 59 a guardian is a person with parental responsibility for a child. Parental responsibility on the other hand means all rights, duties, powers and authority which by law a parent of a child has in relation to a child.

A parent would by law in my view have the power and authority to protect any property rights of and also care for the social welfare of the child. That would include to secure the upbringing of the child by catering to all its needs. It would therefore be proper in a case such as this for the two applicants to be granted the order prayed for so that they can pursue all rights that accrue to the minors here which includes the pursuit of letters of administration of their late fathers estate.

$\overline{3}$

In the result it is ordered that a guardianship Order be granted to KIRABO ANNET and BUSINGYE KELLEN for:

GAVIN TERRY KAGGWA aged 13 YEARS, TATIANA DESIRE KAGGWA aged 11 YEARS, DANIELA DAISY KAGGWA aged 9 YEARS, DION DENISE KAGGWA aged 7 YEARS, TREVOR OX KAGGWA aged 4 YEARS and LUNKUSE DEBORAH aged 8 YEARS.

MICHAEL ELUBU JUDGE

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Re Francis Palmer (2007) HCB 99

Case cited

Constitution of the Republic of Uganda, Article 139

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Judicature Act, Section 14

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Children Act, Cap 59, Section 1

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Children Act, Cap 59, Section 3

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this JurisAssist collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.