Download

Uganda Judgment

HC: Family Division (Uganda)

In Re: EAA & ENA (Infants) (Family Cause 155 of 2015) [2016] UGHCFD 1 (23 February 2016)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The court found that the applicants are the biological parents of the infants and have demonstrated responsibility for their welfare. The evidence showed that the applicants purchased land in the infants’ names and now seek guardianship to obtain a loan for constructing a house on the land, which will generate income for the infants’ benefit. The infants, being of understanding age, confirmed their relationship to the applicants and did not object to the proposed use of the land. The court held that granting the guardianship order is in the best interests of the children, as it will ensure their welfare and aligns with the legal principles governing children’s rights and welfare in Uganda.

Court disposition

application granted

Orders

  • Mary Kagoro and Jackson Mugarra are appointed legal guardians of Elijah Amumpaire Amooti and Elisheba Nsiimire Akiiki.
  • Costs of the application will be met by the applicants.

02

Material facts

Parties

Mary Kagoro

Applicant

Jackson Mugarra

Applicant

Elijah Amumpaire Amooti

Respondent

Elisheba Nsiimire Akiiki

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Family Cause / Ruling

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Whether the applicants should be appointed legal guardians of their biological children to enable them obtain a loan using the children’s land as security for the children’s welfare.

Party arguments

Applicant
The applicants are the biological parents of the infants, responsible for their welfare, education, shelter, and clothing. They purchased land in the infants’ names and seek guardianship to obtain a loan from Centenary Bank, using the land as security, to construct a house for the infants’ benefit. The infants can only sign documents through a guardian, and the loan cannot be obtained without a guardianship order.
Respondent
The infants, as respondents, attended court and confirmed on oath that the applicants are their biological parents and expressed no objection to the applicants disposing of the land for their interests.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Article 34 of the Constitution of Uganda; Children Act Cap 59; international conventions ratified by Uganda.

    The best interests of the child shall be the primary consideration in all matters concerning children.

  2. 02

    Article 139(1) of the Constitution; Section 14 of the Judicature Act Cap 13; Section 98 of the Civil Procedure Act Cap 71.

    The High Court has unlimited original jurisdiction in all matters and inherent powers to grant remedies where there are no specific provisions.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The court found that the applicants are the biological parents of the infants and have demonstrated responsibility for their welfare. The evidence showed that the applicants purchased land in the infants’ names and now seek guardianship to obtain a loan for constructing a house on the land, which will generate income for the infants’ benefit. The infants, being of understanding age, confirmed their relationship to the applicants and did not object to the proposed use of the land. The court held that granting the guardianship order is in the best interests of the children, as it will ensure their welfare and aligns with the legal principles governing children’s rights and welfare in Uganda.

Obiter and limits

  • In all matters concerning children, the best interests of the child shall be the primary consideration.
  • The ascertainable wishes and feelings of the child, in light of age and understanding, are relevant to determining best interests.

Court disposition

application granted

  • Mary Kagoro and Jackson Mugarra are appointed legal guardians of Elijah Amumpaire Amooti and Elisheba Nsiimire Akiiki.
  • Costs of the application will be met by the applicants.

Source and reliance status

HC: Family Division (Uganda)

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Source document

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

HC: Family Division (Uganda)

Judgment

[2016] UGHCFD 1

THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UGANDA AT KAMPALA

FAMILY DIVISION

FAMILY CAUSE 155 OF 2015

IN THE MATTER OF ELIJAH AMUMPAIRE AMOOTI AND ELISHEBA NSIIMIRE AKIIKI INFANTS) AGED EIGHT AND SEVEN YEARS RESPECTIVELY

AND

IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION TO BE APPOINTED LEGAL GUARDIANS OF THE SAID INFANTS BY MARY KAGORO AND JACKSON MUGARRA

BEFORE LADY JUSTICE PERCY NIGHT TUHAISE

RULING

This is an application for legal guardianship brought by notice of motion under sections 5 and 6(21) of the Children Act cap 59, section 9 of the Civil Procedure Act cap 71 and Order 52 of the Civil Procedure Rules SI 71 -1. The applicant, who initially filed the application alone, but later amended it to include Jackson Mugarra as the second applicant, is seeking court to appoint the two as legal guardians of Elijah Amumpaire Amooti and Elisheba Nsiimire Akiiki, aged eight and seven years respectively.

The application is based on grounds that the applicants are the biological parents of the two infants responsible for the said infants’ welfare, education, shelter and clothing; that the 1st applicant bought land known as plot 58 & 57 on Block 185, land at Namugongo, Kiira Town Council and registered it in the infants’ names; that the applicants are desirous of obtaining a loan from Centenary Bank to ensure the infants’ welfare is maintained; that the said infants can only sign documents through a guardian; and that the infants shall not obtain the loan if the guardianship order is not granted.

The application is supported by the affidavit of the Mary Kagoro the 1st applicant. In addition to the supporting affidavit, the two applicants attended court and were interviewed on oath. Elijah Amumpaire Amooti and Elisheba Nsiimire Akiiki, the subjects of the application, also attended court. They were examined on oath by court after being found to be of understanding age.

Article 139(1) of the Constitution, read with section 14 of the Judicature Act, cap 13, give the High Court unlimited original jurisdiction in all matters. Section 98 of the Civil Procedure Act empowers the High Court to invoke its inherent powers to grant remedies where there are no specific provisions. In all matters concerning children, the best interests of the child shall be the primary consideration. This is a legal principle contained in Article 34 of the Constitution, the Children Act, and various international conventions ratified by Uganda concerning the rights of children.

The best interests of the child set out by the Children Act include the ascertainable wishes and feelings of the child in light of his or her age and understanding; the child’s physical, emotional and educational needs; the child’s age, background; and other circumstances relevant in the matter.

The adduced evidence shows that the applicants are the biological parents of the two infants who are students of Sir Apollo Kaggwa Primary School, Nakasero Branch. The two infants reside with the applicants at their home in Rubaga. In 2007 the 1st applicant purchased land known as plot 58 & 57 on Block 185 at Namugongo, Kiira Town Council in the names of the two infants. The applicants want to obtain a loan from Centenary Bank using the certificate of title as security to cater for the two infants’ welfare by constructing a house on the land to generate income for the two infants. The two infants separately stated to court on oath that the applicants are their biological parents and they are not opposed to their disposing of the land to cater for their interests.

The 1st applicant annexed photocopies of the two infants’ birth certificates to her supporting affidavit as B. She also annexed the certificate of title to land comprised in plot 58 & 57 on Block 185 at Namugongo, Kiira Town Council as C to her supporting affidavit. The original documents were later availed to court and they matched the annexed photocopies. Annexture B shows that the two infants are the applicants’ biological children. It also shows that Elijah Amumpaire Amooti is aged eight years and ten months, having been born on 25/04/2007; and Elisheba Nsiimire Akiiki is aged seven years and seven months, having been born on 08/07/08. Annexture C confirms that the land is registered in the names of the two infants.

In this case, where the applicants, who are the infants’ biological parents, seek a guardianship order in respect of their biological children to enable them obtain a loan and use the infants’ certificate of title as security so that they construct a house on the land to generate income for the two infants, such order should be granted as it is for the welfare and best interests of the said infants.

I accordingly make the following orders:-

1. The applicants, Mary Kagoro and Jackson Mugarra, are appointed legal guardians of the two infants Amumpaire Amooti and Elisheba Nsiimire Akiiki.

2. Costs of this application will be met by the applicants.

Dated at Kampala this 23rd day of February 2016.

Percy Night Tuhaise

Judge.

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Children Act Cap 59

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Civil Procedure Act Cap 71

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Judicature Act Cap 13

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Constitution of the Republic of Uganda

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this JurisAssist collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.