Download

Uganda Judgment

HC: Family Division (Uganda)

In Re: Abey Dinah & Ors (Moinors) (Family Cause No. 043 of 2017) [2018] UGHCFD 12 (15 May 2018)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The applicant, Khamis Artema, satisfies all statutory requirements for legal guardianship under the Children Act. He is of suitable age, has no criminal record, and has demonstrated the ability and willingness to care for the children. The children, all above 12 years, have expressed their preference for the applicant, and both paternal and maternal relatives have consented. The Social Welfare Officer's report supports the application. The court finds that granting the guardianship order is in the best interests of the children, given their familial relationship with the applicant, his economic means, and the inability of the current guardian to continue providing for them. The order vests all parental authority and responsibility in the applicant until each child attains the age of 18.

Court disposition

guardianship_order_granted

Orders

  • A Guardianship Order is granted to Khamis Artema for Amina Regina, Abey Dinah, and Abu Martin.
  • The applicant shall within 14 days of delivery of this ruling register this Order with the Uganda Registration Services Bureau and The National Identification and Registration Authority.
  • This Order vests all parental authority and responsibility of the children in the petitioner.
  • The Order shall remain in force, in respect of each child, until that child attains the age of 18 years.

02

Material facts

Parties

Khamis Artema

Applicant

Amina Regina

Respondent

Abey Dinah

Respondent

Abu Martin

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Family Cause / Ruling

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The applicant, Khamis Artema, is a Ugandan citizen, married to the aunt of the minors, and has jointly cared for the children with their paternal aunt, Nadia Florence. Nadia Florence is unable to continue supporting the children and consents to the application. The children, all above 12 years, have expressed their wish for the applicant to be granted guardianship. The applicant has no criminal record and has been positively assessed by a Social Welfare Officer. Consent from a maternal uncle has also been obtained.
Respondent
No formal respondent opposition was recorded. The paternal aunt, Nadia Florence, and maternal uncle, Todwong David, both consented to the application. The children themselves expressed support for the applicant's guardianship. No evidence of payment or reward for the orders sought was found.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Section 43B, Children Act Cap 59 (as amended)

    The High Court is competent to grant guardianship orders under Section 43B of the Children Act (as amended).

  2. 02

    Section 3, Children Act Cap 59

    The best interests and welfare of the child must be the primary consideration in any guardianship application.

  3. 03

    Section 43, Children Act Cap 59 (as amended)

    Guardianship may be granted where the applicant is of suitable age, character, and economic means, and where the wishes of the children and family consent are present.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The applicant, Khamis Artema, satisfies all statutory requirements for legal guardianship under the Children Act. He is of suitable age, has no criminal record, and has demonstrated the ability and willingness to care for the children. The children, all above 12 years, have expressed their preference for the applicant, and both paternal and maternal relatives have consented. The Social Welfare Officer's report supports the application. The court finds that granting the guardianship order is in the best interests of the children, given their familial relationship with the applicant, his economic means, and the inability of the current guardian to continue providing for them. The order vests all parental authority and responsibility in the applicant until each child attains the age of 18.

Obiter and limits

  • The court notes the importance of considering the wishes of children above 12 years in guardianship matters.
  • No evidence was found of any payment or reward in exchange for the orders sought, ensuring the integrity of the process.
  • The applicant's dual residency in Uganda and the USA does not affect his suitability for guardianship as long as the welfare of the children is assured.

Court disposition

guardianship_order_granted

  • A Guardianship Order is granted to Khamis Artema for Amina Regina, Abey Dinah, and Abu Martin.
  • The applicant shall within 14 days of delivery of this ruling register this Order with the Uganda Registration Services Bureau and The National Identification and Registration Authority.
  • This Order vests all parental authority and responsibility of the children in the petitioner.
  • The Order shall remain in force, in respect of each child, until that child attains the age of 18 years.

Source and reliance status

HC: Family Division (Uganda)

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Source document

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

HC: Family Division (Uganda)

Judgment

[2018] UGHCFD 12

THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UGANDA AT JINJA

FAMILY CAUSE NO. 043 OF 2017

IN THE MATTER OF THE CHILDREN ACT

AND

THE CHILDREN (AMMENDMENT) ACT 2016

AND

IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR LEGAL GUARDIANSHIP OF ABEY DINAH, ABU MARTIN AND AMINA REGINA (MINORS)

OF SCHOOL VILLAGE, WALUKUBA MASESE DIVISION,

JINJA MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, JINJA DISTRICT

BEFORE HON. JUSTICE MICHAEL ELUBU

RULING

This is an application filed by KHAMIS ARTEMA, for the legal guardianship of AMINA REGINA (16), ABEY DINAH (15) and ABU MARTIN (12). It is brought under S. 43 B (a), (b), (c) and (d) of The Children Act Cap 59 (as amended).

The background is that KHAMIS ARTEMA, is married to LONAH PATRICK, a sister of OCHAN PATRICK, who is the deceased biological father of the 3 children that the Petitioner seeks a guardianship Order for. The petitioner has, together with one NADIA FLORENCE, had joint custody of children. NADIA is an aunt (also a sister of the children’s deceased father) who states in an affidavit that she does not have the means to continue looking after them.

All three children are in school and were interviewed by this Court in the course of these proceedings.

I find the issues for determination are:

1. Whether this court can grant the order.

2. Whether the applicant can be granted the order 3. What remedies are available 4. Whether this court can grant the order.

Under S. 43 B of The Children Act an application for guardianship shall be made to this High Court.

This court can therefore competently entertain this application.

1. Whether the applicant can be granted the order

The conditions for the grant of an order of guardianship are prescribed by S.43 of The Children Act (as amended). Therefore the grounds on which this application is based shall be assessed against the conditions laid out in the law.

Here the applicant is 35 years of age and within the age bracket that can competently make an application of this nature. His wife LORNA KHAMIS is an aunt of the Children. Her sister, NADIA FLORENCE, has had physical custody of the children assisted by the applicant. NADIA now states that she is unable to cater for all their needs which leaves them exposed.

All the children are above 12 years of age. They are at a stage where they can properly and intelligently speak for themselves. On interview by this court all stated that they were in favour of this application being granted.

I have also considered the petitioners background information. He lives both in Uganda and the United States of America. He is a Ugandan citizen who does not have a criminal record, either in Uganda or the USA.

As is required, a Social Welfare Officer, from the Jinja Probation office has made an assessment of the petitioner and recommended him for grant of a Guardianship Order over the 3 Children. I have studied the report and taken its recommendations into account.

Aside from Nadia Florence, a paternal aunt, there is also consent from Todwong David a maternal uncle indicating he has no objection to this application. I am satisfied from an inquiry made by this Court at the hearing that none of the parties here have received any payment or other reward in exchange for the orders sought here.

This Court has also taken into account that whenever a court determines any matter regarding the upbringing of a child, it shall consider the best interest or welfare of the child, as the primary consideration.

I have considered the circumstances here: the fact that the children and the petitioner are from the same extended family; that their aunt NADIA can longer provide them with sustenance; the economic means of the petitioner; the wishes of the children who state they are in favour of a grant of this application; and the applicant’s willingness to provide the children with a loving family, care and affection.

From all the foregoing, I find that the applicant meets the conditions for a grant of the order applied for. I find farther that it would be in the best interest of the children to grant the said Guardianship Order.

It is therefore ordered as follows:

1. A Guardianship Order is granted to KHAMIS ARTEMA for: 2. AMINA REGINA 3. ABEY DINAH 4. ABU MARTIN 5. The applicant shall within 14 days of delivery of this ruling register this Order with the Uganda Registration Services

Bureau and The National Identification and Registration Authority.

This Order vests all parental authority and responsibility of the children in the petitioner.

The Order shall remain in force, in respect of each child, until that child attains the age of 18 years.

iv)

MICHEAL ELUBU, JUDGE.

15/5/2018

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Children Act Cap 59 (as amended)

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Children (Amendment) Act 2016

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this JurisAssist collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.