Download

Uganda Judgment

HC: Land Division (Uganda)

Iga v Sekagya and Anor (Civil Suit No. 292 of 2014) [2021] UGHCLD 35 (12 April 2021)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The court found that the Plaintiff had never transferred his interest in the suit land to the Defendants and that the transfer forms used to register the Defendants as proprietors contained forged signatures. The Plaintiff's certificate of title was in the custody of a government program as loan security and was never available for lawful transfer. Expert forensic evidence confirmed the signatures on the transfer forms were not those of the Plaintiff. The computerized registration of the 2nd Defendant was not reflected on the original title, further indicating fraudulent registration. The court concluded that both Defendants' registrations were procured by fraud and that the Plaintiff remained the lawful proprietor. The Plaintiff was entitled to cancellation of the Defendants' registration, a declaration of ownership, general damages for pain and inconvenience, and costs of the suit.

Court disposition

Judgment for the Plaintiff.

Orders

  • Cancellation of the Defendants' registration to the suit land comprised in LRV 2398 Folio 20 Plot 2 Kitumbu Road Entebbe.
  • Declaration that the suit land comprised in LRV 2398 Folio 20 Plot 2 Kitumbu Road Entebbe belongs to the Plaintiff, Mr. Felix Iga.
  • General damages of UGX 30,000,000 awarded to the Plaintiff.
  • Costs of the suit awarded to the Plaintiff.

02

Material facts

Parties

Felix Iga

Plaintiff Counsel: Betty Munabi

Eliphaz Sekajja (also referred to as Sekagya)

Defendant

Nakabuye Agnes

Defendant

Amounts and remedies

  • General Damages: UGX 30,000,000

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Civil Suit / Ex Parte Judgment

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The Plaintiff argued that he acquired the suit land in 1987 and was registered as proprietor in 1995. He surrendered the certificate of title as security for a loan, which was repaid, but the title was never returned. He denied ever transferring the property to the Defendants and challenged the authenticity of the signatures on the transfer forms. Expert evidence supported his claim that the signatures were not his. The Plaintiff maintained that the Defendants' registration was fraudulent and sought cancellation, a declaration of ownership, general damages, and costs.
Respondent
The Defendants did not participate in the proceedings despite several attempts to secure their attendance. The suit was heard ex parte and no arguments were presented on their behalf.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Fredrick Zaabwe v Orient Bank & 5 Others SCCA 04/2006

    Fraud in land transactions is any act calculated to deceive, including suppression of truth or suggestion of falsehood, whether by direct falsehood or innuendo.

  2. 02

    Ugandan civil procedure and land law

    A party alleging fraud must plead and prove the particulars of fraud.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The court found that the Plaintiff had never transferred his interest in the suit land to the Defendants and that the transfer forms used to register the Defendants as proprietors contained forged signatures. The Plaintiff's certificate of title was in the custody of a government program as loan security and was never available for lawful transfer. Expert forensic evidence confirmed the signatures on the transfer forms were not those of the Plaintiff. The computerized registration of the 2nd Defendant was not reflected on the original title, further indicating fraudulent registration. The court concluded that both Defendants' registrations were procured by fraud and that the Plaintiff remained the lawful proprietor. The Plaintiff was entitled to cancellation of the Defendants' registration, a declaration of ownership, general damages for pain and inconvenience, and costs of the suit.

Obiter and limits

  • The court noted the confusion regarding the name of the 1st Defendant, clarified by the Plaintiff's advocate after access to land registry documents.
  • The prolonged litigation and inconvenience suffered by the Plaintiff justified an award of general damages.

Court disposition

Judgment for the Plaintiff.

  • Cancellation of the Defendants' registration to the suit land comprised in LRV 2398 Folio 20 Plot 2 Kitumbu Road Entebbe.
  • Declaration that the suit land comprised in LRV 2398 Folio 20 Plot 2 Kitumbu Road Entebbe belongs to the Plaintiff, Mr. Felix Iga.
  • General damages of UGX 30,000,000 awarded to the Plaintiff.
  • Costs of the suit awarded to the Plaintiff.

Source and reliance status

HC: Land Division (Uganda)

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Source document

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

HC: Land Division (Uganda)

Judgment

[2021] UGHCLD 35

THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA IN THE HIGH COURT OF UGANDA AT KAMPALA (LAND DIVISION) CIVIL SUIT NO. 292 0F 2014

| FELIX | IGA--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | |-------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

PLAINTIFF

VS

10 1. SEKAGYA

2. NAKABUYE AGNES----------------------------------------------------------------- DEFENDANTS

Before: Hon. Lady Justice Olive Kazaarwe Mukwaya

15 JUDGMENT

This suit is brought by the Plaintiff against the Defendants seeking;

- 1. Cancellation of the Defendants' registration to the suit land comprised in LRV 2398 Folio 20 Plot 2 Kitumbu Road Entebbe. - 2. A declaration that the suit land belongs to the Plaintiff. - 20 3. General damages for unlawful interference with the Plaintiff's proprietorship of the suit land. - 4. Costs of the suit.

A number of attempts were made to secure the Defendants' participation in this suit and 25 when these proved futile, the suit was set down to be heard ex parte.

Plaintiff's Facts

The Plaintiff took occupation of the suit land in 1987 and acquired registration of the lease from Entebbe Municipality vide LRV Volume 2398 Folio 20 Plot 2 Kitimbu Road Entebbe on 5th of July 1995 under instrument No. 271777. He held a leasehold 5 certificate of title to the suit land upon which is his family home.

In November 1996, during the existence of the EDF Micro Project Programme, under the Prime Minister's office, the Plaintiff with another called John Abiine, then trading as Jason's International Limited, surrendered the original duplicate certificate of title 10 for the suit land as security for loan monies in the amount of UGX18,106,000/= (Uganda Shillings Eighteen Million One Hundred Six Thousand Only). The loan was fully repaid by August 1998, but the EDF Micro Project Programme closed without

15 Later in 2013, the Plaintiff was informed by the then Deputy RDC Entebbe, that the suit property was registered in the names of the 2 nd Defendant, a fact the Plaintiff confirmed on searching the land registry at Wakiso. The 2 nd Defendant is said to have acquired the suit property from the 1 st Defendant though the registration was not effected on the original title (registry copy) but was captured in the Lands Registry computerized 20 system.

returning the Plaintiff's certificate of Title.

The Plaintiff maintains that he has never transferred his property to the 1st Defendant. He has never even met him. Several efforts were made by different agencies to trace the Plaintiff's certificate of title but he was finally informed that it disappeared under 25 unknown circumstances.

Mr. Felix Iga is aggrieved by the cancellation of his registration to the suit land and consequent registration of the Defendants as successive proprietors of the suit land and filed this suit to seek redress.

5 Counsel for the Plaintiff, Ms. Betty Munabi filed final submissions which I have considered.

Issues

- 10 1. Whether the Defendants fraudulently acquired the suit land? - 2. Whether the Plaintiff is entitled to the remedies sought?

RESOLUTION

Issue 1

15 Whether the Defendants fraudulently acquired the suit land?

Fraud is; 'anything calculated to deceive, whether by a single act or combination, or by suppression or truth, or suggestion of what is false, whether it is by direct false hood or innuendo by speech or silence, word of mouth, look or gesture…' See Fredrick Zaabwe v Orient Bank & 5 Others SCCA 04/2006

It was the duty of the Plaintiff to plead the particulars of fraud complained of and he did so under Paragraph 4(h), (i) and (ii) of his Plaint. In addition, the Plaintiff, then made a written statement which was admitted as his evidence in chief. He reiterated the facts of his case and adduced documentary evidence chronicling the repayment of the 25 loan to the EDF Micro Project Programme and his unsuccessful efforts to retrieve his certificate of title from the Government of Uganda, following the closure of the Programme. Mr. Felix Iga distanced himself from the signatures on the transfer form purported to be his own. He denied being called to the land office to verify his signature

on the transfer form that saw the 1st Defendant registered on the title. Regarding the 2nd Defendant's transfer on the title, the Plaintiff testified that while the computerized land registration system names her as the current registered proprietor, the original certificate of title does not reflect her registration. An indicator that her registration was also 5 marred by fraud.

Mr. Felix Iga testified that at all material times, his certificate of title was in the possession of the EDF Micro Project Programme as security for the loan. And the title was therefore not available for transfer to the 1st Defendant and subsequently to the 2nd 10 Defendant.

PW2, Mr. Sebuwufu Erisa, a forensic document examiner at the Directorate of Forensic services was called as an expert witness. He testified that he received a request from M/S Munabi & Co. Advocates, to examine the authenticity of the signature on a transfer form signed on the 8th 15 day of June 1999 in respect of land comprised in LRV 2398 Folio 20 Plot 2 Kitumbu Rd-. Entebbe. Mr. Sebuwufu added that the request was accompanied by the contested transfer form purportedly signed by the Plaintiff and various documents bearing the uncontested signature of the Plaintiff.

PW2 carried out the analysis and in his report dated 25 20 th November 2019, he concluded that in his opinion, the author of the sample signatures most likely did not sign the questioned signatures on the transfer form.

A perusal of the transfer form indicates that the 1st Defendant, (Eliphaz) Sekajja, is the 25 transferee and according to Exb. P.13, he is the current proprietor on the suit land certificate of title having been registered on the 26th September 2013. I had some concerns about the name of the 1st Defendant. It is indicated as 'Sekagya' in the Plaint and yet the transfer instruments bear the name, 'Eliphaz Sekajja'. To clear this up, I summoned the Plaintiff and his advocate and they appeared on the 9th April 2021. Ms. Betty Munabi clarified that when she received instructions from the Plaintiff to file this suit, he only knew the name 'Sekagya'. Full particulars were only obtained after this court granted an order on the 28th November 2016 allowing the Plaintiff to be availed

5 of the documents pertaining to the land from the Commissioner Land Registration.

I am satisfied with that explanation and I find that the Plaintiff has adduced sufficient evidence to establish that fraud took place on his certificate of title, perpetuated by the 1 st and 2nd Defendants.

Issue 2

Whether the Plaintiff is entitled to the remedies sought?

All remedies sought by the Plaintiff are justified in my view. It was on 26th September 2013 that the 1st Defendant fraudulently got himself registered on the Plaintiff's land. This suit was filed on the 4th 15 June 2014. For almost seven years, the Plaintiff has been in court trying to correct the fraud occasioned on his title by the Defendants. These circumstances definitely warrant an award of general damages for pain, inconvenience and suffering. And to that end, I award a sum of UGX 30,000,000/=.

20 In conclusion, I enter judgment for the Plaintiff against the Defendants and order as follows;

- 1. Cancellation of the Defendants' registration to the suit land comprised in LRV 2398 Folio 20 Plot 2 Kitumbu Road Entebbe. - 2. The suit land comprised in LRV 2398 Folio 20 Plot 2 Kitumbu Road 25 Entebbe, belongs to the Plaintiff, Mr. Felix Iga. - 3. General damages of UGX 30,000,000/= are awarded to the Plaintiff. - 4. Costs of the suit are awarded to the Plaintiff.

----------------------------

Olive Kazaarwe Mukwaya

5 JUDGE

12th April 2021

Delivered by email to Counsel for the Plaintiff.

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Fredrick Zaabwe v Orient Bank & 5 Others SCCA 04/2006

Case cited

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this JurisAssist collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.