Download

Uganda Judgment

HC: Criminal Division (Uganda)

Habib Buwembo v Uganda (Criminal Appeal 49 of 2023) [2024] UGHCCRD 4 (31 January 2024)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The court found that the appellant filed the notice and memorandum of appeal approximately three months and nineteen days after the lower court's dismissal of the case, far outside the statutory fourteen-day period prescribed by Section 28(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code Act. The appellant did not seek or obtain an extension of time to appeal as required by law. As a result, the court held that the appeal was not properly before it and was incompetent. The appeal was therefore dismissed for want of compliance with mandatory procedural requirements regarding the time for filing criminal appeals.

Court disposition

Appeal dismissed for being incompetent due to late filing without leave of court.

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed for being incompetent.

02

Material facts

Parties

Habib Buwembo

Appellant

Uganda

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Preliminary Objection (timeliness of Appeal)

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Whether the appeal was properly instituted within the statutory time for filing appeals.

Party arguments

Applicant
The appellant challenged the trial magistrate's decision on several grounds, including failure to consider the alternative suspect theory, not ordering the return of his gadget, and not awarding compensation for alleged wrongful incarceration. However, the core issue before the High Court was whether the appeal itself was properly filed within the statutory time limit.
Respondent
The respondent contended that the appeal was filed out of time, contrary to the requirements of Section 28 of the Criminal Procedure Code Act, and that no application for extension of time was made, rendering the appeal incompetent.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Section 28(1) and (6) of the Criminal Procedure Code Act

    A criminal appeal must be commenced by filing a notice of appeal within fourteen days of the judgment or order appealed against, unless an extension is granted for good cause.

  2. 02

    Section 31(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code Act

    Where an appeal is filed out of time without leave of court, the appeal is incompetent and must be dismissed.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The court found that the appellant filed the notice and memorandum of appeal approximately three months and nineteen days after the lower court's dismissal of the case, far outside the statutory fourteen-day period prescribed by Section 28(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code Act. The appellant did not seek or obtain an extension of time to appeal as required by law. As a result, the court held that the appeal was not properly before it and was incompetent. The appeal was therefore dismissed for want of compliance with mandatory procedural requirements regarding the time for filing criminal appeals.

Court disposition

Appeal dismissed for being incompetent due to late filing without leave of court.

  • The appeal is dismissed for being incompetent.

Source and reliance status

HC: Criminal Division (Uganda)

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Source document

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

HC: Criminal Division (Uganda)

Judgment

[2024] UGHCCRD 4

THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UGANDA HOLDEN AT KAMPALA

(CRIMINAL DIVISION)

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 49 OF 2023

ARISING FROM THE CHIEF MAGISTRATES’ COURT OF BUGANDA ROAD CRIMINAL CASE NO. 220 OF 2022

HABIB BUWEMBO ……………………..……….…………………………… APPELLANT

Vs.

UGANDA ………………………………………..…...……………………… RESPONDENT

JUDGEMENT

BEFORE HON. JUSTICE GADENYA PAUL WOLIMBWA

1. Introduction

On 25th February 2022, Buwembo Habib, hereinafter called the Appellant, was charged with the Offense of threatening violence contrary to section 81(a) of the Penal Code Act. The prosecution case was that the Appellant and others still at large, during February 2022, in Kampala District, with the intent to intimidate or annoy Honourable Anita Among, the then Deputy Speaker of the Parliament of Uganda, threatened to injure her. However, on 28 February 2023, H/W Owomugisha Siena dismissed the matter for want of prosecution. Being dissatisfied with the decision of H/W Owomugisha Siena on 16th June 2023, the Appellant filed this appeal because:

1. The Learned Trial Magistrate erred in law and fact when she ignored the alternative suspect theory that the complainant threatened herself.

2. The Learned Trial Magistrate erred in law and fact when she failed to order the return of the Appellants Gadget after dismissing him.

3. The Learned Trial Magistrate erred in law and fact when she did not order the prosecution to compensate the Appellant with costs and damages after incarcerating him in Luzira Prison and making him suffer for no reason. 4. Issue for Determination 5. Whether the Appeal before this court was properly instituted within the statutory time for filing appeals? 6. Determination of Issue

Issue: Whether the Appeal before this court was properly instituted?

Section 28 of *the* Criminal Procedure Code Act, which governs the filing of criminal appeals, provides as follows:

*“(1). Every appeal shall be commenced by a notice in writing which shall be signed by the appellant or an advocate on his or her behalf and shall be lodged with the registrar within fourteen days of the date of judgment or order from which the appeal is preferred.*

*(2). Every notice of appeal shall state shortly the effect of the judgment or order appealed against and shall-*

*(a) Contain a full and sufficient address at which any notices or documents connected with the appeal may be served on the appellant or his or her advocate, and;*

*(b). except where subsection (3) applies, state the general grounds upon which the appeal is preferred.*

*(3). If the appellant or an advocate on his or her behalf indicates at the time of filing a notice of appeal that he or she wishes to peruse the judgment or order appealed against before formulating the grounds of appeal, he or she shall be provided with a copy of the judgment or order, free of charge, and the grounds of appeal shall be lodged with the registrar within fourteen days of the date of the service on him or her of the copy of the judgment or order.*

*(4). Where the appellant is represented by an advocate or the appeal is preferred by the Director of Public Prosecutions, the grounds of appeal shall include particulars of the matters of law or of fact in regard to which the court appealed from is alleged to have erred.*

*(5). Where an appellant who is not represented has not availed himself or herself of the provisions of subsection (3), nothing in this section shall be read as preventing the appellate court from permitting the appellant from raising any proper ground of appeal orally at the hearing of the appeal.*

*(6). The appellate court may, for good cause shown, extend the periods mentioned in subsection (1) or (3).”*

According to section 28 of the Criminal Procedure Code Act, appeals shall be commenced by either filing a Notice of Appeal containing the proposed grounds of appeal or a Notice of Appeal with a request to the trial court to avail the appellant with the record of the lower court for purposes of enabling them formulate grounds of appeal. The notice of appeal must be filed within fourteen days of the judgment or order being appealed. However, where the appellant requests for the record of the lower court, then they must file their memorandum of appeal within 14 days from the date of receipt of the record. In all other cases, if the appellant does not comply with Section 28 of the Criminal Procedure Code Act, they must apply for leave to appeal out of time under Section 31(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code Act. The court may enlarge the time for appealing if the applicant shows sufficient cause.

In the instant case, the Appellant filed his Notice and Memorandum of Appeal on 16th June 2023, approximately three months and 19 days after the lower court dismissed the case for want of prosecution. The Notice and Memorandum of Appeal were filed after the statutory 14-day period provided for under Section 28(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code Act. The Appellant did not seek an order to extend the time for appealing. Given this default, the Appellant does not have a valid appeal before the court, and the appeal is consequently dismissed for being incompetent.

1. Decision

In the result, the Appeal is dismissed for being incompetent.

![](data:image/x-emf;base64...)![](data:image/x-emf;base64...)

Gadenya Paul Wolimbwa

![](data:image/x-emf;base64...)

JUDGE

31st January 2024

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Section 28, Criminal Procedure Code Act

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Section 31(1), Criminal Procedure Code Act

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this JurisAssist collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.