Download

Uganda Judgment

Commercial Court of Uganda

Greenland Bank (In Liquidation) v Dr Apuuli Kihumuro & Anor (HCT-00-CC-CS 790 of 2003) [2006] UGCommC 62 (20 March 2006)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The court held that the suit is not time barred because the cause of action accrued in 1999 when a demand for payment was made and ignored by the defendants, not in 1995 when the last withdrawal occurred. Additionally, the defendants' alleged acknowledgement of the debt in 1999, as pleaded by the plaintiffs, invokes Section 24 of the Limitation Act, which resets the limitation period to the date of acknowledgement. The pleadings raise a triable issue regarding the acknowledgement of debt, which must be investigated. Therefore, the preliminary objection is overruled and the case shall proceed to scheduling and hearing.

Court disposition

preliminary objection overruled; suit to proceed

Orders

  • The objection is overruled.
  • The case shall proceed to scheduling and hearing.
  • Plaintiffs shall have the costs of the ruling.

02

Material facts

Parties

Greenland Bank (In Liquidation)

Plaintiff Counsel: Mr. Sembatya

Dr. Apuuli Kihumuro

Defendant Counsel: Mr. Mugenyi

Mrs. Margaret Kihumuro

Defendant Counsel: Mr. Mugenyi

Amounts and remedies

  • Outstanding Overdraft Amount: UGX 68,104.59

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Civil Suit / Ruling on Preliminary Objection

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
Counsel for the defendants argued that the suit is time barred under Section 3(2) of the Limitation Act, as the last withdrawal from the account was on 6/10/95 and the suit was filed in 2003, more than six years later. He contended that the plaintiffs have no cause of action against the defendants.
Respondent
Counsel for the plaintiffs argued that the cause of action accrued in 1999 when a demand for payment was made and ignored by the defendants. He further submitted that the defendants acknowledged the debt in 1999, which, under Section 24 of the Limitation Act, resets the accrual date, making the suit maintainable.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Section 3(2) Limitation Act

    An action for an account shall not be brought in respect of any matter which arose more than six years before the commencement of the action.

  2. 02

    Section 24 Limitation Act

    Where a right of action to recover a debt has accrued and the person liable acknowledges the claim or makes any payment, the right shall be deemed to have accrued on and not before the date of acknowledgement or last payment.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The court held that the suit is not time barred because the cause of action accrued in 1999 when a demand for payment was made and ignored by the defendants, not in 1995 when the last withdrawal occurred. Additionally, the defendants' alleged acknowledgement of the debt in 1999, as pleaded by the plaintiffs, invokes Section 24 of the Limitation Act, which resets the limitation period to the date of acknowledgement. The pleadings raise a triable issue regarding the acknowledgement of debt, which must be investigated. Therefore, the preliminary objection is overruled and the case shall proceed to scheduling and hearing.

Obiter and limits

  • A banker cannot recover a dormant overdraft more than six years after the last advance unless a demand for payment is made within that period.
  • Where a loan is granted without agreement as to the date of repayment, the loan is repayable on demand.
  • The determination of the accrual date for debt recovery actions may not be easy and can become an issue as in this case.

Court disposition

preliminary objection overruled; suit to proceed

  • The objection is overruled.
  • The case shall proceed to scheduling and hearing.
  • Plaintiffs shall have the costs of the ruling.

Source and reliance status

Commercial Court of Uganda

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Source document

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Commercial Court of Uganda

Judgment

[2006] UGCommC 62

{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\uc1\deff0\stshfdbch0\stshfloch0\stshfhich0\stshfbi0\deflang2057\deflangfe2057{\fonttbl{\f0\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02020603050405020304}Times New Roman;}{\f263\froman\fcharset238\fprq2 Times New Roman CE;} {\f264\froman\fcharset204\fprq2 Times New Roman Cyr;}{\f266\froman\fcharset161\fprq2 Times New Roman Greek;}{\f267\froman\fcharset162\fprq2 Times New Roman Tur;}{\f268\froman\fcharset177\fprq2 Times New Roman (Hebrew);} {\f269\froman\fcharset178\fprq2 Times New Roman (Arabic);}{\f270\froman\fcharset186\fprq2 Times New Roman Baltic;}{\f271\froman\fcharset163\fprq2 Times New Roman (Vietnamese);}}{\colortbl;\red0\green0\blue0;\red0\green0\blue255;\red0\green255\blue255; \red0\green255\blue0;\red255\green0\blue255;\red255\green0\blue0;\red255\green255\blue0;\red255\green255\blue255;\red0\green0\blue128;\red0\green128\blue128;\red0\green128\blue0;\red128\green0\blue128;\red128\green0\blue0;\red128\green128\blue0; \red128\green128\blue128;\red192\green192\blue192;}{\stylesheet{\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \snext0 Normal;}{\*\cs10 \additive \ssemihidden Default Paragraph

Font;}{\*\ts11\tsrowd\trftsWidthB3\trpaddl108\trpaddr108\trpaddfl3\trpaddft3\trpaddfb3\trpaddfr3\tscellwidthfts0\tsvertalt\tsbrdrt\tsbrdrl\tsbrdrb\tsbrdrr\tsbrdrdgl\tsbrdrdgr\tsbrdrh\tsbrdrv \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs20\lang1024\langfe1024\cgrid\langnp1024\langfenp1024 \snext11 \ssemihidden Normal Table;}{\s15\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar \tqc\tx4320\tqr\tx8640\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext15 \styrsid5401929 footer;}{\*\cs16 \additive \sbasedon10 \styrsid5401929 page number;}} {\*\latentstyles\lsdstimax156\lsdlockeddef0}{\*\listtable{\list\listtemplateid418689692\listhybrid{\listlevel\levelnfc0\levelnfcn0\leveljc0\leveljcn0\levelfollow0\levelstartat1\levelspace360\levelindent0{\leveltext\leveltemplateid134807567 \'02\'00.;}{\levelnumbers\'01;}\fi-360\li720\jclisttab\tx720\lin720 }{\listlevel\levelnfc4\levelnfcn4\leveljc0\leveljcn0\levelfollow0\levelstartat1\levelspace360\levelindent0{\leveltext\leveltemplateid134807577\'02\'01.;}{\levelnumbers\'01;}\fi-360\li1440 \jclisttab\tx1440\lin1440 }{\listlevel\levelnfc2\levelnfcn2\leveljc2\leveljcn2\levelfollow0\levelstartat1\levelspace360\levelindent0{\leveltext\leveltemplateid134807579\'02\'02.;}{\levelnumbers\'01;}\fi-180\li2160\jclisttab\tx2160\lin2160

}{\listlevel \levelnfc0\levelnfcn0\leveljc0\leveljcn0\levelfollow0\levelstartat1\levelspace360\levelindent0{\leveltext\leveltemplateid134807567\'02\'03.;}{\levelnumbers\'01;}\fi-360\li2880\jclisttab\tx2880\lin2880 }{\listlevel\levelnfc4\levelnfcn4\leveljc0\leveljcn0 \levelfollow0\levelstartat1\levelspace360\levelindent0{\leveltext\leveltemplateid134807577\'02\'04.;}{\levelnumbers\'01;}\fi-360\li3600\jclisttab\tx3600\lin3600 }{\listlevel\levelnfc2\levelnfcn2\leveljc2\leveljcn2\levelfollow0\levelstartat1\levelspace360 \levelindent0{\leveltext\leveltemplateid134807579\'02\'05.;}{\levelnumbers\'01;}\fi-180\li4320\jclisttab\tx4320\lin4320 }{\listlevel\levelnfc0\levelnfcn0\leveljc0\leveljcn0\levelfollow0\levelstartat1\levelspace360\levelindent0{\leveltext \leveltemplateid134807567\'02\'06.;}{\levelnumbers\'01;}\fi-360\li5040\jclisttab\tx5040\lin5040 }{\listlevel\levelnfc4\levelnfcn4\leveljc0\leveljcn0\levelfollow0\levelstartat1\levelspace360\levelindent0{\leveltext\leveltemplateid134807577 \'02\'07.;}{\levelnumbers\'01;}\fi-360\li5760\jclisttab\tx5760\lin5760 }{\listlevel\levelnfc2\levelnfcn2\leveljc2\leveljcn2\levelfollow0\levelstartat1\levelspace360\levelindent0{\leveltext\leveltemplateid134807579\'02\'08.;}{\levelnumbers\'01;} \fi-180\li6480\jclisttab\tx6480\lin6480 }{\listname

;}\listid442190702}}{\*\listoverridetable{\listoverride\listid442190702\listoverridecount0\ls1}}{\*\rsidtbl \rsid872560\rsid1136281\rsid1530928\rsid2162735\rsid2958918\rsid2969577\rsid3238812\rsid4868113 \rsid4935493\rsid5197079\rsid5401929\rsid6041232\rsid7028013\rsid7803031\rsid7997165\rsid8085975\rsid8542294\rsid9375302\rsid9518004\rsid12415116\rsid12791993\rsid13117648\rsid13259335\rsid13398409\rsid15869835\rsid16073745}{\*\generator Microsoft Word 11 .0.5604;}{\info{\title THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA}{\author ikobusinge}{\operator kgalenda}{\creatim\yr2009\mo8\dy7\hr13\min32}{\revtim\yr2009\mo8\dy7\hr13\min32}{\version2}{\edmins1}{\nofpages4}{\nofwords808}{\nofchars4606}{\*\company Courts of Judicature} {\nofcharsws5404}{\vern24689}}\margl1728\margr1152 \widowctrl\ftnbj\aenddoc\noxlattoyen\expshrtn\noultrlspc\dntblnsbdb\nospaceforul\formshade\horzdoc\dgmargin\dghspace180\dgvspace180\dghorigin1728\dgvorigin1440\dghshow1\dgvshow1 \jexpand\viewkind1\viewscale100\pgbrdrhead\pgbrdrfoot\splytwnine\ftnlytwnine\htmautsp\nolnhtadjtbl\useltbaln\alntblind\lytcalctblwd\lyttblrtgr\lnbrkrule\nobrkwrptbl\snaptogridincell\allowfieldendsel\wrppunct\asianbrkrule\nojkernpunct\rsidroot8542294 \fet0 {\*\ftnsep \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid8085975 \chftnsep \par }}{\*\ftnsepc

\pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid8085975 \chftnsepc \par }}{\*\aftnsep \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid8085975 \chftnsep \par }}{\*\aftnsepc \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid8085975 \chftnsepc \par }}\sectd \linex0\endnhere\sectlinegrid360\sectdefaultcl\sectrsid8542294\sftnbj {\footer \pard\plain \s15\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\tqc\tx4320\tqr\tx8640\pvpara\phmrg\posxc\posy0\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid13117648 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\field{\*\fldinst {\cs16\insrsid4868113 PAGE }}{\fldrslt {\cs16\lang1024\langfe1024\noproof\insrsid3238812 1}}}{\cs16\insrsid4868113 \par }\pard \s15\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\tqc\tx4320\tqr\tx8640\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 {\insrsid4868113 \par }}{\*\pnseclvl1\pnucrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl2\pnucltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl3\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl4\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta

)}} {\*\pnseclvl5\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl6\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl7\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl8 \pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl9\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}\pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid3238812 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\b\insrsid1136281\charrsid3238812 \par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid3238812 {\b\insrsid8542294\charrsid3238812 THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA \par \par IN THE HIGH COURT OF UGANDA AT KAMPALA \par (COMMERCIAL COURT DIVISION) \par \par HCT-00-CC-CS-0790-2003 \par }\pard \qj \li0\ri0\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid3238812 {\b\insrsid8542294\charrsid3238812 \par GREENLAND BANK (IN LIQUIDATION) ::::::::::::::::: PLAINTIFF \par \par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid3238812 {\b\insrsid8542294\charrsid3238812 VERSUS \par }\pard \qj \li0\ri0\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid3238812 {\b\insrsid8542294\charrsid3238812 \par DR.

APUULI KIHUMURO \par MRS. MARGARET KIHUMURO ::::::::::::::::::::::: DEFENDANTS \par }{\b\insrsid4935493\charrsid3238812 \par }{\b\i\ul\insrsid4935493\charrsid3238812 Legislation referred to: \par {\listtext\pard\plain\i\lang1033\langfe1033\langnp1033\langfenp1033\insrsid4935493\charrsid3238812 \hich\af0\dbch\af0\loch\f0 1.\tab}}\pard \qj \fi-360\li720\ri0\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar \jclisttab\tx720\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\ls1\adjustright\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid3238812 {\i\insrsid4935493\charrsid3238812 Limitation Act. \par }\pard \qj \li0\ri0\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid3238812 {\b\insrsid8542294\charrsid3238812 \par \par BEFORE: }{\b\ul\insrsid8542294\charrsid3238812 THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE YOROKAMU BAMWINE}{\b\insrsid8542294\charrsid3238812 \par \par }{\b\ul\insrsid8542294\charrsid3238812 R U L I N G: \par }{\b\insrsid8542294\charrsid3238812 \par }{\insrsid8542294\charrsid3238812 When this suit came up for a scheduling conference, Mr. Mugenyi for the defendants raised a preliminary point of law. He argued that the plaintiffs have no cause of action against the defendants. In his view, the suit is time barred. He cited to me S. 4 (1) of the Limitation Act. \par \par Following the revision of our laws, it is now S. 3 (2) of the Limitation Act. \par \par That law states: \par }\pard \qj

\li720\ri720\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin720\lin720\itap0\pararsid3238812 {\b\i\insrsid8542294\charrsid3238812 \'93(2}{\b\i\insrsid15869835\charrsid3238812 ) An}{\b\i\insrsid8542294\charrsid3238812 action for an account shall not be brought in respect of any matter which arose more than 6 years before the commencement of the action.\'94 \par }\pard \qj \li0\ri0\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid3238812 {\insrsid2958918\charrsid3238812 \par It is Mr. Mugenyi\rquote s view that according to the plaintiff\rquote s pleadings, the defendants operated an account; they over drew it; and a sum of Shs.68}{\insrsid15869835\charrsid3238812 , 104,587}{\insrsid2958918\charrsid3238812 - is outstanding.

\par \par It is his view further that according to the pleadings, the last amount is indicated on the statement of Account as}{\insrsid9518004\charrsid3238812 having been withdrawn on 6/10/95. That a demand was made in 1999 bu t a suit was not filed until 2003. In his view, by the time the suit was filed, the cause of action was already time barred. Mr. Sembatya for the plaintiffs does not agree. He invited me to find that the cause of action accrued to the plaintiffs in 199 9 when a demand for payment was made and the defendants ignored it. Accordingly, it is the view of counsel that when the plaintiffs filed the suit in 2003, the same was not time barred.}{\insrsid2958918\charrsid3238812 \par }{\insrsid9518004\charrsid3238812 \par I have very carefully addressed my mind to the point of law raised by Mr. Mugenyi. The law as stated in S.3}{\insrsid1530928\charrsid3238812 (2) of the Limitation Act is simply that an action cannot be brought after the expiration of six years from the date when it accrued. Of course if it is a simple contract, the determination of the accrual date may n ot be difficult to ascertain. Court would look at the terms of the contract. But if it is an action for the recovery of a debt, the determination of the accrual date may not be easy to ascertain and therefore}{\insrsid9375302\charrsid3238812 become an issue as

herein.}{\insrsid9518004\charrsid3238812 \par }{\insrsid9375302\charrsid3238812 \par Generally speaking, a debt is repayable when it is due. And that date becomes the date when the }{\insrsid5401929\charrsid3238812 cause of}{\insrsid9375302\charrsid3238812 action arises. Coming specifically to Bank Law, this Court is of the view that a banker cannot recover a dormant overdraft more than six years after the last advance. For purposes of this case, this appears to have been 6/10/95. This must be taken as the date when the last over draft was extended to the defendants. A suit filed after more than 6 years would fail unless a demand for payment is on record to have been made in between. In the instant suit, the last overdraft was extended to the defendants}{\insrsid16073745\charrsid3238812 in 1995. A demand was made for its payment in 1999. The suit would only have been time barred if, in 1999 no such demand had been made and the suit was filed after 2001. For this reason alone, I would accept Mr. Sembatya\rquote s argument that the suit is maintainable against the defendants.}{\insrsid9375302\charrsid3238812 \par }{\insrsid16073745\charrsid3238812 \par In the interests of justice, I will discuss one more aspect which in my view defeats the defendants\rquote prayer for the Court to dismiss the suit on account of being time barred. \par \par From the records, when the issue of

indebtedness was put to the defendants in 1999, they appear to have made a partial admission of the claim. They did so through their lawyers vide their letter of 22/11/99. The plaintiffs have pleaded the defendants \rquote purported acknowledgement of a debt in para 4 (e) of their plaint. Assuming this to be the case, then S. 24 of the Limitation Act appears to be applicable. Under that law, where any right of action has accrued to recover a debt or other liquidated pecuniary claim and the person liable or accountable thereafter acknowledges the claim or makes any payment in respect thereof, the right shall be deemed to have accrued on and not before the date of acknowledgement or t he last payment. Since the plaintiffs have pleaded the fact or the alleged act of acknowledgment of a debt by the defendants, this now makes it a triable issue. \par \par When all is said and done, I hold that where a loan is granted without agreement as to the dat e of repayment, as it appears to be the case herein, the loan is repayable on demand. If demand is made 6 years after the advancement of the loan to the defendant, such a claim is time barred by }{\insrsid5401929\charrsid3238812 virtue of}{ \insrsid16073745\charrsid3238812 S. 3 (2) of the Limitation. Since the last over d raft is deemed to have been extended on 6/10/95 when the defendants are on record to have made the last withdrawal

from their account, by the time a demand was made against them in 1999, the account had not been dormant for six years to warrant dismissal o f the suit filed in 2003. The cause of action accrued to the plaintiffs in 1999 when a demand for payment was made and the defendants ignored it. In any case, the pleadings raise the issue of acknowledgment of a debt by the defendants which issue ought to be investigated and remedied. The objection is overruled. The case shall proceed to scheduling and hearing. Plaintiffs shall have the costs of the ruling. \par \par Yorokamu Bamwine \par }{\b\insrsid16073745\charrsid3238812 J U D G E \par }{\insrsid16073745\charrsid3238812 21/03/200}{\insrsid13398409\charrsid3238812 6}{\insrsid16073745\charrsid3238812 \par }{\insrsid13398409\charrsid3238812 \par }{\b\insrsid13398409\charrsid3238812 Court:}{\insrsid13398409\charrsid3238812 Scheduling conference on 10/04/2006 at 11 a.m. \par \par Yorokamu Bamwine \par }{\b\insrsid13398409\charrsid3238812 J U D G E \par }{\insrsid13398409\charrsid3238812 21/03/2006 \par }}

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Limitation Act, Section 3(2)

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Limitation Act, Section 24

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this JurisAssist collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.