Share
Fory and Others v Republic of Cote D'Ivoire (Application No. 034/2017) [2021] AfCHPR 14 (25 November 2021)
- Citation
- [2021] AfCHPR 14
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Uganda
- Court
- African Court on Human and Peoples Rights
- Panel
- Aboud P, Anukam J, Ben Achour J, Bensaoula J, Chizumila J, Kioko J, Mengue J, Mukamulisa J, Ntsebeza J, Sacko J, Tchikaya VP
- Case number
- Application No. 034/2017
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- African Court on Human and Peoples Rights
- Panel
- Aboud P, Anukam J, Ben Achour J, Bensaoula J, Chizumila J, Kioko J, Mengue J, Mukamulisa J, Ntsebeza J, Sacko J, Tchikaya VP
- Case number
- Application No. 034/2017
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The Court found that, while the applicant's wife and children were alleged to be indirect or vicarious victims of the alleged human rights violations, they did not have standing as applicants in the absence of explicit consent or authorization. The Court reiterated its jurisprudence that a person may act on behalf of others only with their consent or authorization. Since the applicant's family members were of legal age and had not provided such consent, only Kouadio Kobena Fory could be recognized as the applicant. Consequently, the Court ordered that the title of the application be amended to reflect him as the sole applicant.
Court disposition
Application title amended to reflect Kouadio Kobena Fory as sole applicant.
Orders
- Kouadio Kobena Fory is declared the sole applicant in the case.
- The title of Application No. 034/2017 is amended to read: 'Kouadio Kobena Fory v. Republic of Côte d’Ivoire'.
02
Material facts
Parties
Kouadio Kobena Fory
Applicant Counsel: Self-representedRepublic of Côte d’Ivoire
Respondent Counsel: Ms LY Sangare, Née Kadiatou03
Procedural history
Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Change of Title of Application
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the applicant's wife and children have standing as applicants before the Court.
- 02
Whether the title of the application should reflect only Kouadio Kobena Fory as the applicant.
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The applicant, Kouadio Kobena Fory, claimed to act on his own behalf and on behalf of his wife and three children, alleging that their rights were violated as a result of his arrest, conviction, and subsequent detentions. He argued that the violations suffered by his family were closely related to his legal predicament and thus justified their inclusion as applicants.
- Respondent
- The respondent state argued that only Kouadio Kobena Fory, as the direct victim, had standing as an applicant. It contended that his wife and children, being of legal age, should bring their own cases if they wished, and that they could not be included as applicants in this application without their explicit consent or authorization.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Sébastien Germain Ajavon v. Republic of Benin, ACtHPR, Application No. 062/2019, Judgment (Merits) (4 December 2020), § 58.
Neither the Charter, the Protocol, nor the Rules require that the applicant and the victim be the same person; a person may act on behalf of others if they have consent or authorization.
- 02
Suy Bi Gohore Émile and others v. Republic of Côte d’Ivoire, ACtHPR, Application No. 044/2019, Judgement of 15 July 2020 (Merits and Reparations), § 67; Ingabire Victoire Umuhoza v. Republic of Rwanda, (Jurisdiction) (3 June 2016) 1 AfCLR 540 § 69.
Withdrawal of a state's declaration under Article 34(6) of the Protocol does not affect pending cases or new cases filed before the withdrawal takes effect.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The Court found that, while the applicant's wife and children were alleged to be indirect or vicarious victims of the alleged human rights violations, they did not have standing as applicants in the absence of explicit consent or authorization. The Court reiterated its jurisprudence that a person may act on behalf of others only with their consent or authorization. Since the applicant's family members were of legal age and had not provided such consent, only Kouadio Kobena Fory could be recognized as the applicant. Consequently, the Court ordered that the title of the application be amended to reflect him as the sole applicant.
Obiter and limits
- The Court noted that the rights of the applicant's wife and children were closely related to his legal predicament but this did not confer standing as applicants without their consent.
- The Court recalled that its previous jurisprudence allows for representation only with proper authorization from those represented.
Court disposition
Application title amended to reflect Kouadio Kobena Fory as sole applicant.
- Kouadio Kobena Fory is declared the sole applicant in the case.
- The title of Application No. 034/2017 is amended to read: 'Kouadio Kobena Fory v. Republic of Côte d’Ivoire'.
Source and reliance status
African Court on Human and Peoples Rights
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
African Court on Human and Peoples Rights
Judgment
| | | | | --- | --- | --- | | AFRICAN UNION |  | UNION AFRICAINE | |  | UNIÃO AFRICANA | | AFRICAN COURT ON HUMAN AND PEOPLES’ RIGHTS COUR AFRICAINE DES DROITS DE L’HOMME ET DES PEUPLES | | |
THE MATTER OF
KOUADIO KOBENA FORY, SPOUSE, SONS AND DAUGHTERS
V.
REPUBLIC OF CÔTE D’IVOIRE
APPLICATION NO. 034 /2017
RULING
(CHANGE OF TITLE OF APPLICATION)
25 NOVEMBER 2021
The Court, composed of Imani D. ABOUD, President, Blaise TCHIKAYA, Vice-President, Ben KIOKO, Rafaâ BEN ACHOUR, Suzanne MENGUE, M-Thérèse MUKAMULISA, Tujilane R. CHIZUMILA, Chafika BENSAOULA, Stella I. ANUKAM, Dumisa B. NTSEBEZA, Modibo SACKO - Judges; and Robert ENO, Registrar
In the Matter of
KOUADIO Kobena Fory, spouse, son and daughters
*Self-represented*
Versus
REPUBLIC OF COTE D’IVOIRE
*Represented by*:
Ms LY Sangare, Née Kadiatou, Judicial Officer of the Treasury
After deliberation,
*renders the following Order:*
THE PARTIES
Mr Kouadio Kobena Fory, self-represented and declaring to act on behalf of his wife Jeanne Yavo and his three (3) children Jean-Eudes Wilfried, Akoua Merveille Laetitia and Linda De-la-Sainte Face, (hereinafter, referred to as “the Applicants” is a national of Cote d’ Ivoire, as are those he represents.
The Application is filed against the Republic of Cote D’Ivoire (hereinafter referred to as "the Respondent State"), which became a party to the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights (hereinafter referred to as "the Charter") on 31 March 1992 and to the Protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights on the Establishment of an African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights (hereinafter referred to as “the Protocol”) on 25 January 2004. On 23 July 2013, the Respondent State deposited the Declaration provided for in Article 34(6) of the Protocol by virtue of which it accepted the jurisdiction of the Court to receive applications from individuals and Non-Governmental Organisations having observer status with the African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights. On 29 April 2020, the Respondent State deposited with the African Union Commission an instrument of withdrawal of its Declaration. The Court has ruled that this withdrawal has no bearing on pending cases and on new cases filed before the entry into force of the withdrawal one year after its deposit, that is, on 30 April 2021.[[1]](#footnote-1)
SUBJECT OF THE APPLICATION
A. Facts of the matter
The Applicant alleges that, in 1995, he was arrested, convicted and sentenced to ten (10) years in prison, payment of a fine and damages to the Respondent State for acts of embezzlement of public funds. One week after his release from prison in 2005, he was re-arrested and held without trial until his release in 2011.
Believing that his fundamental rights and those of his wife and children were violated by the Respondent State, the Applicant, acting on his own behalf and on behalf of his wife and three children, filed this Application with the Court on 8 November 2017.
Alleged violations
The Applicant alleges that the Respondent State violated his rights to a fair trial, to physical and moral integrity, to freedom of opinion as well as his right to property. He further alleges that his right as well as that of his wife to work and to adequate remuneration were violated and that the double detention violated his right to protection of the right to a family for his wife and children.
SUMMARY OF THE PROCEDURE BEFORE THE COURT
The initial Application was received by the Registry on 8 November 2017. On 8 May 2018, the Applicant, at his own initiative, filed additional submissions to his Application.
On 2 July 2018, the Application and the additional submissions were served on the Respondent State.
On 12 October 2021, pleadings were closed and the parties were duly informed.
CHANGE OF TITLE OF APPLICATION
The Respondent State avers that while the standing of Kouadio Kobena Fory, the alleged direct victim of human rights violations, does not pose a problem, the same is not true for his wife Jeanne Yavo, son Jean-Eudes Wilfried and daughters Akoua Merveille Laetitia and Linda De-la-Sainte Face who obviously do not have standing as Applicants. It contends that the family members on whose behalf the Applicant claims to be acting are all of legal age and have the ability to bring a case directly before the Court.
\*\*\*
The Court recalls its previous jurisprudence that "neither the Charter, nor the Protocol, nor the Rules require that the Applicant and the victim have to be the same,”[[2]](#footnote-2) and that any person who can sue can do so on his or her own behalf and/or on behalf of others if they obtain the consent or authorization of the persons on behalf of whom they are acting.
In this case, the Court notes that the Applicant submits that the alleged violations of the rights of his wife and his children are closely related to his legal predicament since his double arrest and his detention. It can be inferred that the Applicant’s wife and children are indirect or vicarious victims and are therefore not considered as Applicants in this case.
In light of the foregoing, the Court finds that Mr Kouadio Kobena Fory is the only Applicant in the instant case and declares the objection of the Respondent State to be founded.
The Court, having thus concluded, considers it necessary to amend the title of Application No. 034/2017: Kouadio Kobena Fory, spouse, son and daughters v. Republic of Côte d’Ivoire and retain the identity of the sole Applicant Kouadio Kobena Fory.
OPERATIVE PART
For these reasons,
THE COURT,
*Unanimously*,
*Finds that* Kouadio Kobena Fory is the sole Applicant in the instant case;
*Orders that* the title of the Application “N°034/2017: *Kouadio Kobena Fory, spouse, son and daughters v. Republic of Cote d’Ivoire*» shall be amended to read as follows: « N°034/2017: *Kouadio Kobena Fory v. Republic of Côte d’Ivoire*»;
Signed:
Imani D. ABOUD, President;
and Robert ENO, Registrar.
Done in Dar Es-Salam, this Twenty-Fifth Day of November in the year Two Thousand and Twenty-One, in English and French, the French text being authoritative.
1. *Suy Bi Gohore Émile and others v. Republic of Côte d’Ivoire*, ACtHPR, Application No. 044/2019, Judgement of 15 July 2020 (Merits and Reparations), § 67; *Ingabire Victoire Umuhoza v. Republic of Rwanda*, (Jurisdiction) (3 June 2016) 1 AfCLR 540 § 69. [↑](#footnote-ref-1) 2. *Sébastien Germain Ajavon v. Republic of Benin*, ACtHPR, Application No. 062/2019, Judgment (Merits) (4 December 2020), § 58. [↑](#footnote-ref-2)
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.