Download

Uganda Judgment

African Commission on Human and Peoples Rights

Emil Touray and Saikou Jammeh (represented by IHRDA and Sagar Jahateh) v The Republic of The Gambia (Communication 705 of 2018) [2020] ACHPR 5 (16 August 2020)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The African Commission found no objection to the withdrawal request submitted by the complainants' representatives, who confirmed they were acting on behalf of and under the instructions of the complainants. The Commission, therefore, granted the request and declared the communication closed, in accordance with its rules and established practice regarding voluntary withdrawal of complaints.

Court disposition

communication withdrawn and closed

Orders

  • The request for withdrawal is granted.
  • The communication is declared closed.

02

Material facts

Parties

Emil Touray

Applicant Counsel: IHRDA and Sagar Jahateh

Saikou Jammeh

Applicant Counsel: IHRDA and Sagar Jahateh

The Republic of The Gambia

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Communication / Withdrawal and Closure

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Whether the request for withdrawal and discontinuation of the communication by the complainants' representatives should be granted.

Party arguments

Applicant
The applicants, through their representatives, requested withdrawal and discontinuation of the communication, stating they were acting on behalf of and under the instructions of the complainants.
Respondent
The respondent did not object or submit arguments regarding the withdrawal request.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights Rules of Procedure

    A party may withdraw a communication before the African Commission if the request is made by authorized representatives acting on instructions of the complainants.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The African Commission found no objection to the withdrawal request submitted by the complainants' representatives, who confirmed they were acting on behalf of and under the instructions of the complainants. The Commission, therefore, granted the request and declared the communication closed, in accordance with its rules and established practice regarding voluntary withdrawal of complaints.

Court disposition

communication withdrawn and closed

  • The request for withdrawal is granted.
  • The communication is declared closed.

Source and reliance status

African Commission on Human and Peoples Rights

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Source document

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

African Commission on Human and Peoples Rights

Judgment

[2020] ACHPR 5

AFRICAN UNION

الاتحاد لأفريقي African Commission on Human & Peoples' Rights

![](_page_0_Picture_1.jpeg)

UNION AFRICAINE

UNIÃO AFRICANA

Commission Africaine des Droits de l'Homme & des Peuples

31 Bijilo Annex Layout, Kombo North District, Western Region, P. O. Box 673, Banjul, TheGambia Tel: (220) 4410505/ 4410506; Fax: (220) 4410504<br>E-mail: au-banjul@africa-union.org; Web www.achpr.org

Communication 705/18

Emil Touray and Saikou Jammeh (represented by IHRDA and Sagar Jahateh)

The Republic of The Gambia

Adopted by the African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights during the 64<sup>th</sup> Ordinary Session from 24<sup>th</sup> April to 14<sup>th</sup> May 2019 Sharm El-Sheikh, Arab Republic of Egypt

Commissioner Soyata Maiga Chairperson of the African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights

S-DWARRICKIN L'HOMME ET D'

Dr. Mary Maboreke Secretary to the African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights

DECISION OF THE AFRICAN COMMISSION ON HUMAN AND PEOPLES' RIGHTS ON WITHDRAWAL

Communication 705/18 – Emil Touray and Saikou Jammeh (represented by IHRDA and Sagar Jahateh) v The Republic of The Gambia

Summary of the Application for Withdrawal

- 1. The Secretariat of the African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights (the Secretariat) received a Complaint on 12 September 2018 from Emil Touray and Saikou Jammeh (the Complainants), represented by IHRDA and Sagar Jahateh, against The Republic of The Gambia. - 2. The African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights (African Commission) seized the Communication during its 63<sup>rd</sup> Ordinary Session, held from 24 October to 13 November 2018. - 3. A request for withdrawal and discontinuation of the case before the African Commission was received from the representatives of the Complainants on 16 April 2019. The representatives submit that in requesting the withdrawal they are acting on behalf of and under the instructions of the Complainants in this Communication.

Analysis of the African Commission

- 4. The Commission sees no objection in granting this request. - 5. For this reason the Commission decides to grant the request for withdrawal.

Decision of the African Commission

6. Based on the above, the Commission declares the Communication closed.

Done in Sharm el Sheikh, Egypt during the 64<sup>th</sup> O rdnary Session held from 24 April to 14 May 201 9

![](_page_1_Picture_12.jpeg)

$\overline{1}$

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this JurisAssist collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.