Download

Uganda Judgment

High Court of Uganda

Charles Sabiiti & Ors v Teddy Seezi Cheeye (Civil Suit No. 516 of 1997) [2001] UGHC 5 (15 November 2001)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The court found that the plaintiffs provided credible evidence, including testimony from the corporation's Managing Director, that the article's allegations were false and that no impropriety occurred. The defendants failed to adduce any evidence or submissions to prove the truth of the article or to establish the defence of fair comment. Applying established legal principles, the court held that the article was not true, did not qualify as fair comment on a matter of public interest, and was defamatory. The article lowered the plaintiffs' reputation in the eyes of reasonable persons, as evidenced by the testimony of colleagues and family. The court also found malice in the absence of any explanation from the defendants. The plaintiffs were entitled to general and exemplary damages, with the quantum guided by comparable awards in similar cases. Interest and costs were also awarded.

Court disposition

Judgment for the plaintiffs.

Orders

  • Each plaintiff is awarded UGX 6,000,000 as general damages.
  • Each plaintiff is awarded UGX 3,000,000 as exemplary/punitive damages.
  • Interest at 20% per annum on general and exemplary damages from the date of judgment until payment in full.
  • Plaintiffs are awarded costs of the suit.

02

Material facts

Parties

Charles Sabiiti & Others

Plaintiff

Teddy Seezi Cheeye

Defendant

Amounts and remedies

  • General Damages Per Plaintiff: UGX 6,000,000
  • Exemplary Damages Per Plaintiff: UGX 3,000,000
  • Interest Rate Per Annum: PERCENT 20

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Civil Suit / Judgment

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The plaintiffs argued that the article published in 'Uganda Confidential' was false, not a fair comment, and defamatory. They denied receipt of any money as alleged and presented evidence, including testimony from the Managing Director of New Vision, confirming the corporation's accounts were in order and no impropriety was evident. They sought general, special, and exemplary damages for the harm to their reputation.
Respondent
The defendants maintained in their written statement that the article was true in substance and fact, published without malice, and constituted fair comment on a matter of public interest. They argued the statements were not highly defamatory and that the plaintiffs' reputation had not suffered. However, they called no witnesses and filed no written submissions.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Figuerado vs Editor, Sunday Nation & Others [1968] EA 501

    To succeed in a defence of fair comment, the words complained of must be shown to be comment, fair comment, and fair comment on some matter of public interest. The defendant must prove the truth of each statement of fact and that the comment was bona fide.

  2. 02

    East African Standard vs Gitau [1970] EA 678

    The test of what is defamatory is whether the words complained of would tend to lower the reputation of the plaintiff in the opinion of right-thinking persons, considering the general impression created in the minds of reasonable persons.

  3. 03

    W. S. O. Davies vs Mohanlal Karamshi Shah [1957] CA 352, 354

    Punitive or exemplary damages are awarded as punishment or deterrent, without reference to any proved actual loss suffered by the plaintiff.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The court found that the plaintiffs provided credible evidence, including testimony from the corporation's Managing Director, that the article's allegations were false and that no impropriety occurred. The defendants failed to adduce any evidence or submissions to prove the truth of the article or to establish the defence of fair comment. Applying established legal principles, the court held that the article was not true, did not qualify as fair comment on a matter of public interest, and was defamatory. The article lowered the plaintiffs' reputation in the eyes of reasonable persons, as evidenced by the testimony of colleagues and family. The court also found malice in the absence of any explanation from the defendants. The plaintiffs were entitled to general and exemplary damages, with the quantum guided by comparable awards in similar cases. Interest and costs were also awarded.

Obiter and limits

  • Plaintiffs, as parties to the suit, have a right to be present throughout the hearing and cannot be excluded from court at any stage.
  • Punitive or exemplary damages serve as punishment or deterrent and are not tied to actual loss.
  • The value of currency and comparable awards in similar cases must be considered when assessing damages.

Court disposition

Judgment for the plaintiffs.

  • Each plaintiff is awarded UGX 6,000,000 as general damages.
  • Each plaintiff is awarded UGX 3,000,000 as exemplary/punitive damages.
  • Interest at 20% per annum on general and exemplary damages from the date of judgment until payment in full.
  • Plaintiffs are awarded costs of the suit.

Source and reliance status

High Court of Uganda

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Source document

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

High Court of Uganda

Judgment

[2001] UGHC 5

{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\uc1\deff0\stshfdbch0\stshfloch0\stshfhich0\stshfbi0\deflang2057\deflangfe2057{\fonttbl{\f0\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02020603050405020304}Times New Roman;}{\f149\froman\fcharset238\fprq2 Times New Roman CE;} {\f150\froman\fcharset204\fprq2 Times New Roman Cyr;}{\f152\froman\fcharset161\fprq2 Times New Roman Greek;}{\f153\froman\fcharset162\fprq2 Times New Roman Tur;}{\f154\froman\fcharset177\fprq2 Times New Roman (Hebrew);} {\f155\froman\fcharset178\fprq2 Times New Roman (Arabic);}{\f156\froman\fcharset186\fprq2 Times New Roman Baltic;}{\f157\froman\fcharset163\fprq2 Times New Roman (Vietnamese);}}{\colortbl;\red0\green0\blue0;\red0\green0\blue255;\red0\green255\blue255; \red0\green255\blue0;\red255\green0\blue255;\red255\green0\blue0;\red255\green255\blue0;\red255\green255\blue255;\red0\green0\blue128;\red0\green128\blue128;\red0\green128\blue0;\red128\green0\blue128;\red128\green0\blue0;\red128\green128\blue0; \red128\green128\blue128;\red192\green192\blue192;}{\stylesheet{\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe2057\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp2057 \snext0 Normal;}{\*\cs10 \additive \ssemihidden Default Paragraph

Font;}{\*\ts11\tsrowd\trftsWidthB3\trpaddl108\trpaddr108\trpaddfl3\trpaddft3\trpaddfb3\trpaddfr3\tscellwidthfts0\tsvertalt\tsbrdrt\tsbrdrl\tsbrdrb\tsbrdrr\tsbrdrdgl\tsbrdrdgr\tsbrdrh\tsbrdrv \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs20\lang1024\langfe1024\cgrid\langnp1024\langfenp1024 \snext11 \ssemihidden Normal Table;}{ \s15\ql \li0\ri0\sb100\sa100\sbauto1\saauto1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe2057\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp2057 \sbasedon0 \snext15 \styrsid1536583 Normal (Web);}{\s16\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar \tqc\tx4153\tqr\tx8306\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe2057\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp2057 \sbasedon0 \snext16 \styrsid2644449 footer;}{\*\cs17 \additive \sbasedon10 \styrsid2644449 page number;}} {\*\latentstyles\lsdstimax156\lsdlockeddef0}{\*\listtable{\list\listtemplateid-1570710050\listhybrid{\listlevel\levelnfc0\levelnfcn0\leveljc0\leveljcn0\levelfollow0\levelstartat1\levelspace0\levelindent0{\leveltext\leveltemplateid134807567 \'02\'00.;}{\levelnumbers\'01;}\fbias0 \fi-360\li720\jclisttab\tx720\lin720 }{\listlevel\levelnfc4\levelnfcn4\leveljc0\leveljcn0\levelfollow0\levelstartat1\levelspace0\levelindent0{\leveltext\leveltemplateid134807577\'02\'01.;}{\levelnumbers\'01;} \fi-360\li1440\jclisttab\tx1440\lin1440

}{\listlevel\levelnfc2\levelnfcn2\leveljc2\leveljcn2\levelfollow0\levelstartat1\levelspace0\levelindent0{\leveltext\leveltemplateid134807579\'02\'02.;}{\levelnumbers\'01;}\fi-180\li2160\jclisttab\tx2160\lin2160 } {\listlevel\levelnfc0\levelnfcn0\leveljc0\leveljcn0\levelfollow0\levelstartat1\levelspace0\levelindent0{\leveltext\leveltemplateid134807567\'02\'03.;}{\levelnumbers\'01;}\fi-360\li2880\jclisttab\tx2880\lin2880 }{\listlevel\levelnfc4\levelnfcn4\leveljc0 \leveljcn0\levelfollow0\levelstartat1\levelspace0\levelindent0{\leveltext\leveltemplateid134807577\'02\'04.;}{\levelnumbers\'01;}\fi-360\li3600\jclisttab\tx3600\lin3600 }{\listlevel\levelnfc2\levelnfcn2\leveljc2\leveljcn2\levelfollow0\levelstartat1 \levelspace0\levelindent0{\leveltext\leveltemplateid134807579\'02\'05.;}{\levelnumbers\'01;}\fi-180\li4320\jclisttab\tx4320\lin4320 }{\listlevel\levelnfc0\levelnfcn0\leveljc0\leveljcn0\levelfollow0\levelstartat1\levelspace0\levelindent0{\leveltext \leveltemplateid134807567\'02\'06.;}{\levelnumbers\'01;}\fi-360\li5040\jclisttab\tx5040\lin5040 }{\listlevel\levelnfc4\levelnfcn4\leveljc0\leveljcn0\levelfollow0\levelstartat1\levelspace0\levelindent0{\leveltext\leveltemplateid134807577 \'02\'07.;}{\levelnumbers\'01;}\fi-360\li5760\jclisttab\tx5760\lin5760

}{\listlevel\levelnfc2\levelnfcn2\leveljc2\leveljcn2\levelfollow0\levelstartat1\levelspace0\levelindent0{\leveltext\leveltemplateid134807579\'02\'08.;}{\levelnumbers\'01;} \fi-180\li6480\jclisttab\tx6480\lin6480 }{\listname ;}\listid1560246236}}{\*\listoverridetable{\listoverride\listid1560246236\listoverridecount0\ls1}}{\*\pgptbl {\pgp\ipgp0\itap0\li0\ri0\sb0\sa0}}{\*\rsidtbl \rsid875633\rsid1536583\rsid2644449\rsid5252204 \rsid9988488\rsid14767283\rsid16325364}{\*\generator Microsoft Word 11.0.5604;}{\info{\title S }{\author Administrator}{\operator jchemeri}{\creatim\yr2001\mo1\dy2\hr3\min49}{\revtim\yr2001\mo1\dy2\hr7\min18}{\version3}{\edmins39}{\nofpages5} {\nofwords1312}{\nofchars7485}{\*\company JSI}{\nofcharsws8780}{\vern24689}}\paperw11906\paperh16838 \widowctrl\ftnbj\aenddoc\noxlattoyen\expshrtn\noultrlspc\dntblnsbdb\nospaceforul\formshade\horzdoc\dgmargin\dghspace180\dgvspace180\dghorigin1800 \dgvorigin1440\dghshow1\dgvshow1\jexpand\viewkind1\viewscale100\pgbrdrhead\pgbrdrfoot\splytwnine\ftnlytwnine\htmautsp\nolnhtadjtbl\useltbaln\alntblind\lytcalctblwd\lyttblrtgr\lnbrkrule\nobrkwrptbl\snaptogridincell\allowfieldendsel\wrppunct \asianbrkrule\rsidroot1536583\newtblstyruls\nogrowautofit \fet0{\*\ftnsep \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe2057\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp2057 {\insrsid2644449

\chftnsep \par }}{\*\ftnsepc \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe2057\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp2057 {\insrsid2644449 \chftnsepc \par }}{\*\aftnsep \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe2057\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp2057 {\insrsid2644449 \chftnsep \par }}{\*\aftnsepc \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe2057\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp2057 {\insrsid2644449 \chftnsepc \par }}\sectd \linex0\headery708\footery708\colsx708\endnhere\sectlinegrid360\sectdefaultcl\sectrsid9988488\sftnbj {\footer \pard\plain \s16\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar \tqc\tx4153\tqr\tx8306\pvpara\phmrg\posxr\posy0\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid220094 \fs24\lang2057\langfe2057\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp2057 {\field{\*\fldinst {\cs17\insrsid2644449 PAGE }}{\fldrslt { \cs17\lang1024\langfe1024\noproof\insrsid14767283 1}}}{\cs17\insrsid2644449 \par }\pard \s16\ql \li0\ri360\widctlpar\tqc\tx4153\tqr\tx8306\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin360\lin0\itap0\pararsid2644449 {\insrsid2644449 \par }}{\*\pnseclvl1\pnucrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl2\pnucltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl3\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta

.}}{\*\pnseclvl4\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta )}} {\*\pnseclvl5\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl6\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl7\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl8 \pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl9\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}\pard\plain \s15\qc \li0\ri0\sb100\sa240\sbauto1\sl360\slmult1 \widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\ipgp1\pararsid2644449 \fs24\lang2057\langfe2057\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp2057 {\b\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA \line IN THE HIGH COURT OF UGANDA AT KAMPALA \line }{\b\ul\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 CIVIL SUIT NO.516/97 }{\b\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 \line CHARLES}{ \b\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid2644449 }{\b\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 SABIITI&OTHERS}{\b\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid2644449 \'85\'85\'85\'85\'85\'85\'85\'85\'85\'85\'85\'85\'85\'85}{ \b\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 PL}{\b\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid2644449 AINTIFFS \line VERSUS \line TEDDY SEEZI

C}{\b\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 HEEYE}{ \b\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid2644449 \'85\'85\'85\'85\'85\'85\'85\'85\'85\'85\'85\'85\'85\'85\'85\'85}{\b\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 DEFENDANT \line }{\b\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid2644449 \par }\pard \s15\ql \li0\ri0\sb100\sa240\sbauto1\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\ipgp1\pararsid2644449 {\b\ul\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 BEFORE: THE HON. MR. JUSTICE }{ \b\ul\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid2644449 MUGAMBA}{\ul\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 \line }{\ul\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid2644449 \par }\pard \s15\qc \li0\ri0\sb100\sa240\sbauto1\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\ipgp1\pararsid2644449 {\b\ul\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid2644449 JUDGMENT}{ \ul\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 }{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 \line }{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid2644449 \par }\pard \s15\ql \li0\ri0\sb100\sa240\sbauto1\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\ipgp1\pararsid5252204 {\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 At the

time this suit was filed the three plai ntiffs herein were respectively Chief Accountant, Deputy Chief Accountant and Chief Internal Auditor of the New Vision Printing and Publishing Corporation. The first defendant was at the time Editor in-chief and the second defendant was the }{ \lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid2644449\charrsid9988488 Proprietor}{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 and Publisher of a publication called }{\b\ul\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 Uganda Confidential. }{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 This suit was brought jointly and severally against both defendants by the plaintiffs seeking general, special and exemplary/punitive and/or aggravated damages arising from an article \lquote \'93Eating\'94 scandal triggers off crisis in }{ \b\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 \'93}{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid2644449 New}{\b\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 }{ \lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 Vision\'94\rquote . The article was contained in the publication of November 8-15, 1996. In the written statement of defence the defendants maintain the article is true in substance and fact, that it was published without malice and is a fair comment in a matter of public

interest. The defence states further that the statement is not highly defamatory of the plaintiffs and that the plaintiffs\rquote reputation and character has not suffered at all as a result of the publication. \line } {\b\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid2644449 \par }{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 The following issues were agreed at the outset: \line }{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid2644449 \par {\listtext\pard\plain\s15 \lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 \hich\af0\dbch\af0\loch\f0 1.\tab}}\pard \s15\ql \fi-360\li720\ri0\sb100\sa240\sbauto1\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar \jclisttab\tx720\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\ls1\adjustright\rin0\lin720\itap0\ipgp1\pararsid2644449 {\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 Whether the a}{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid2644449 rticle complained of was true? \par {\listtext\pard\plain\s15 \lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 \hich\af0\dbch\af0\loch\f0 2.\tab}}{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 Whether the article was a fair comment on a}{ \lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid2644449 matter of public interest? \par {\listtext\pard\plain\s15 \lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 \hich\af0\dbch\af0\loch\f0

3.\tab}}{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 Whether the article was de}{ \lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid2644449 famatory of the plaintiffs? \line \par {\listtext\pard\plain\s15 \lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 \hich\af0\dbch\af0\loch\f0 4.\tab}}{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 If so what remedies are available to the plaintiffs? \line }{ \lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid2644449 \par }\pard \s15\ql \li0\ri0\sb100\sa240\sbauto1\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\ipgp1\pararsid2644449 {\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 Court h}{ \lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid2644449 e}{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 a}{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid2644449 r}{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 d the evidence of eleven witnesses called on behalf of the plaintiffs, inclusive of the three plaintiffs, in proof of their case. No witnesses were called in support of the defence. What is more on 29}{ \lang1033\langfe2057\super\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid2644449 th}{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 August 2001 when Co unsel for the defendants had declared that the defence were calling no witnesses and were therefore closing

their case Counsel for both}{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid2644449 parties agreed to file written }{ \lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 submissions. There have been no written submissions by the defendants. Consequently this case will be decided on what evidence is available. \line }{ \lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid2644449 \par }\pard \s15\ql \li0\ri0\sb100\sa240\sbauto1\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\ipgp1\pararsid5252204 {\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 The first issue is whether the article complained of was true. The plaintiffs tendered copy of the }{\b\ul\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid2644449\charrsid9988488 Uganda}{\b\ul\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 Confidential }{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 for the period November 8-15, 1996, where the article was contained, as an exhibit. I t was received as Exhibit P.1. All the three plaintiffs deny receipt of the money that article alleged they did receive and the manner they allegedly got it. The plaintiffs called the evidence of PW11 William Pike who was the Managing Director and Editor in-Chief of New Vision Printing and Publications Corporation. It was his evidence that the Corporation\rquote s accounts had been in good order and no

impropriety had been evident. He testified that the article was not true. The next thing one would have expected to transpire in light of the claim by the plaintiffs is evidence on behalf of the defendants trying to show that the article contained statements w}{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid2644449 hich were true. As such is not }{ \lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 forthcoming, I will hold that there is no evidence to show that the article is true. \line }{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid16325364 \par }{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 The second issue is whether the article was a fair comment in a matter of public interest. This Court in }{\b\ul\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid16325364\charrsid16325364 Fig}{ \b\ul\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid16325364 uerado vs Editor, Sunday}{\ul\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 }{\b\ul\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 Nation & Others }{ \lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 [19681 EA 501 stated the position at page 505 of the report thus: \line }{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid16325364 \par }\pard \s15\ql \li720\ri0\sb100\sa240\sbauto1\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin720\itap0\ipgp1\pararsid16325364

{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 \lquote To succeed in a defen ce of fair comment, the words \'93complained of\'94 must be shown to be: }{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid16325364 (a) comment, (b) fair comment, (c) fair comment on some }{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 matters of public interest. At the trial it is incumbent on a defendant to prove (1) that each and every statement of fact in the wor}{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid16325364 ds complained of is true and }{ \lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 (}{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid16325364 2}{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 ) that the comment on the facts so proved was bona fide fair comment on a matter of public interest. If a defendant fails to prove the truth of any of the statement of facts, he fails in his defence.\rquote \line }{ \lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid16325364 \par }\pard \s15\ql \li0\ri0\sb100\sa240\sbauto1\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\ipgp1\pararsid16325364 {\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 The defendants did not deem it necessary to bring evidence to show that the article was a fair comment on a matter of public interest. In the result I hold that the article fell short of the standard of fair comment. \line }{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid16325364

\par }{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 Whether the article was defamatory of the plaintiffs is the third issue for resolution. The Court of Appeal for East Africa in }{ \b\ul\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid16325364 East African Standard}{\ul\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 }{\b\ul\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 vs Gitau }{ \lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 [1970] EA 67}{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid16325364 8 per Spry, Acting President, sta}{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 ted the position thus at page 681: \line }{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid16325364 \par }\pard \s15\ql \li720\ri0\sb100\sa240\sbauto1\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin720\itap0\ipgp1\pararsid16325364 {\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 \'93 The test of what is defamatory is whether the words complained of would tend t o lower the reputation of the plaintiff in the opinion of right-thinking persons. I do not think this is a case where the words used would be analysed too closely. I think we should look at the general impression they are likely to create in the minds of r}{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid16325364 easonable persons.

..\'94}{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 \line \par }\pard \s15\ql \li0\ri0\sb100\sa240\sbauto1\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\ipgp1\pararsid5252204 {\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 See also }{ \b\ul\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 Hough vs London Express Newspapers Ltd }{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 [1940] 2 K. B. 507 and }{ \b\ul\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid16325364\charrsid16325364 L}{\b\ul\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid16325364 ewis}{\ul\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 }{ \b\ul\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 vs Daily Telegraph }{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 [19631 2 All ER 151. PW4, PW5, PW6 and PW7 knew all the plaintiffs. They read the article complained of and understood the article to mean that the plaintiffs had taken advantage of their positions and misappropriated money from their employer. They no longer held the plaintiffs in the high esteem in which they held them before. PW8, wife of the second plaintiff, after reading the arti cle came to regard her husband as dishonest. I have no doubt in my mind that the article was defamatory of the plaintiffs. In the absence of

explanation I find the article malicious also. \line Before I go to the last issue agreed, I must state that evidence in this case was heard by my late brother Justice Ignatius Malinga who unfortunately was not allowed to see this case through. In the course of hearing he made two rulings reasons for which he undertook to give on the occasion of judgment. I must turn to tha t unfinished business now. \line }{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid16325364 \par }{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 On 3}{\lang1033\langfe2057\super\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid16325364 rd}{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 November 1997 when the first plaintiff had started testifying the second defendant protested the presence of the other plaintiffs in court as that was prejudicial to his case. Court thereafter overruled the objection promi sing to give reasons at the time of judgment. The plaintiffs are parties to a suit and as such have a right to be present throughout the course of the suit in court. To send them out of court at any stage would be excluding them from the hearing of their case. This cannot be done. \line }{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid16325364 \par }{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 On }{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid16325364\charrsid9988488

22}{\lang1033\langfe2057\super\langnp1033\insrsid16325364\charrsid16325364 nd}{ \lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid16325364 }{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid16325364\charrsid9988488 October}{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 1998 Counsel for the defendants objected to a witness quoting beyond the words put under quotation marks in the plaint within paragraph 5. I note that in a way court did give its reasons for overruling the objecti on. At any rate it is noteworthy that quotation from the passage objected to did not continue after the overruling. \line \par Having reached the conclusions I have I give judgment to the plaintiffs. \line }{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid16325364 \par }{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 There remains the question of what reliefs are available to th e plaintiffs. Apart from general damages the plaintiffs claim exemplary/punitive damages. Concerning exemplary/punitive damages the position was optly stated in }{\b\ul\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 W. S. O. Davies vs Mohanlal Karamshi }{\b\ul\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid16325364 Shah}{\ul\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 }{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 [1957] CA 352, 354 thus: \line

}{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid16325364 \par }\pard \s15\ql \li720\ri0\sb100\sa240\sbauto1\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin720\itap0\ipgp1\pararsid16325364 {\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 \'93The third point indicated a failure by the learned judge to appreciate that punitive or exemplary damages are, as their names imply, damages by way of punishment or deterrent. They are given entirely without reference, to any proved actual loss suffered by the plaintiff\'94. }{ \lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid16325364 \par }\pard \s15\ql \li0\ri0\sb100\sa240\sbauto1\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\ipgp1\pararsid16325364 {\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 The plaint iffs in their submissions pray for Shs.5}{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid16325364\charrsid9988488 , 000,000}{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 /= as exemplary/punitive damages. I want to believe that the defendants have realised the folly of printing }{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid16325364 and publishing defamatory article o}{ \lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 f the nature before court and that as a result they should be encouraged to thrive if they are to disseminate more agreeable news and ideas. In

that vein exemplary damages will be Shs.3}{ \lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid16325364\charrsid9988488 , 000,000}{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 /= to each of the plaintiffs. \line }{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid875633 \par }\pard \s15\ql \li0\ri0\sb100\sa240\sbauto1\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\ipgp1\pararsid5252204 {\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 Concerning general damages counsel for the plaintiff suggests Shs.7}{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid875633\charrsid9988488 , 000,000}{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 /= to each of the plai ntiffs having reviewed various awards by this court to different people over time. The case of }{\b\ul\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 Kaijuka vs }{\b\ul\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid875633 Cheeye}{ \ul\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 }{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 HCCS 688/91 where an award of Shs.14}{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid875633\charrsid9988488 , 000,000}{ \lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 /= general damages was made to a Cabinet Minister and that of }{\b\ul\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid875633

Rhoda}{ \ul\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 }{\b\ul\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid875633 Kalema}{\ul\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 }{ \b\ul\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 vs William Pike }{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 HCCS 611/93 where Shs.4}{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid875633\charrsid9988488 , 500,000}{ \lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 /= was awarded to a former distinguished civil servant and then that of }{\b\ul\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 Gordon }{ \b\ul\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid875633 Wavamuno}{\ul\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 }{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 (without more particulars) where Shs.l5}{ \lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid875633\charrsid9988488 , 000,000}{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 /= was awarded as general damages to a local and international businessman. Perhaps I should add that case of }{ \b\ul\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid875633 Emmanuel}{\ul\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 }{\b\ul\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid875633

Tumusiime}{ \ul\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 }{\b\ul\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 Mutebile & }{\b\ul\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid875633 2}{ \b\i\ul\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 }{\b\ul\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 others vs Teddy Ssezi Cheeye }{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 HCCS 341/92 where Shs.4}{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid875633\charrsid9988488 , 800,000}{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 /= was awarded to a Pe}{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid875633 rmanent Secretary. Taking into }{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 account all the circumstances and the value of the currency I would award Shs.6,.000,000/= to each of the plaintiffs as general damages. \line }{ \lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid875633 \par }{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 There shall be interest accruing at 20% p}{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid875633 er annum on general damages and }{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 exemplary/punitive damages from the date of judgment until realisation in full. \line }{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid875633 \par

}{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 The plaintiffs are entitled to costs of this suit. \line }{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid875633 \par }\pard \s15\qc \li0\ri0\sb100\sa240\sbauto1\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\ipgp1\pararsid875633 {\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 P. M}{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid875633 ugamba}{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 \line }{\b\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 Judge \line }{\b\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid875633 15/11/2001}{ \lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 \par }\pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid5252204 \fs24\lang2057\langfe2057\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp2057 {\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid1536583\charrsid9988488 \par }}

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Figuerado vs Editor, Sunday Nation & Others [1968] EA 501

Case cited

East African Standard vs Gitau [1970] EA 678

Case cited

Hough vs London Express Newspapers Ltd [1940] 2 K.B. 507

Case cited

Lewis vs Daily Telegraph [1963] 2 All ER 151

Case cited

W. S. O. Davies vs Mohanlal Karamshi Shah [1957] CA 352, 354

Case cited

Kaijuka vs Cheeye HCCS 688/91

Case cited

Rhoda Kalema vs William Pike HCCS 611/93

Case cited

Gordon Wavamuno (no citation provided)

Case cited

Emmanuel Tumusiime Mutebile & 2 others vs Teddy Ssezi Cheeye HCCS 341/92

Case cited

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this JurisAssist collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.