Download

Uganda Judgment

High Court of Uganda

Bagamuhunda Vincent v Uganda Electricity Board (In Liquidation) (High Court Civil Suit No. 400 of 2007) [2008] UGHC 53 (16 November 2008)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The High Court held that, following the binding authority of the Court of Appeal in Mavunwa Edson and Others v Uganda Electricity Generation Company Ltd, the Uganda Electricity Board ceased to exist upon the enactment of the Electricity Act, 1999. As such, any suit brought against it is against a non-existent party. The court found that the plaintiff's suit was misconceived, incompetent, and bad in law, and accordingly dismissed it under Order 6 Rule 29 of the Civil Procedure Act. The court further held that no order as to costs could be made against a non-existent entity. Leave to appeal was granted to the plaintiff upon request.

Court disposition

suit dismissed as incompetent

Orders

  • The suit is dismissed for being brought against a non-existent party.
  • No order as to costs is made against a non-existent entity.
  • Leave to appeal is granted to the plaintiff.

02

Material facts

Parties

Bagamuhunda Vincent

Plaintiff Counsel: Mr. Caleb Mugisha

Uganda Electricity Board (in liquidation)

Defendant Counsel: Mr. Wamala

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Civil Suit / Preliminary Objection Ruling

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The plaintiff argued that he is entitled to payment in lieu of notice of termination and that the computation and payment should be in accordance with the Employment Act.
Respondent
The defendant, through counsel, argued that the Uganda Electricity Board ceased to exist with the enactment of the Electricity Act, 1999, as held by the Court of Appeal in Mavunwa Edson and Others v Uganda Electricity Generation Company Ltd, and therefore the plaintiff has sued a non-existent party.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Court of Appeal Civil Appeal No. 96 of 2004 Mavunwa Edson and Others v Uganda Electricity Generation Company Ltd; Electricity Act, 1999

    A suit cannot be maintained against a non-existent or dissolved entity.

  2. 02

    Doctrine of precedent

    Decisions of the Court of Appeal are binding on the High Court.

  3. 03

    Civil Procedure Act, Order 6 Rule 29

    A suit brought against a non-existent party is misconceived, incompetent, and bad in law and should be dismissed under Order 6 Rule 29 of the Civil Procedure Act.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The High Court held that, following the binding authority of the Court of Appeal in Mavunwa Edson and Others v Uganda Electricity Generation Company Ltd, the Uganda Electricity Board ceased to exist upon the enactment of the Electricity Act, 1999. As such, any suit brought against it is against a non-existent party. The court found that the plaintiff's suit was misconceived, incompetent, and bad in law, and accordingly dismissed it under Order 6 Rule 29 of the Civil Procedure Act. The court further held that no order as to costs could be made against a non-existent entity. Leave to appeal was granted to the plaintiff upon request.

Obiter and limits

  • There shall be no order as to costs against a non-existent entity.
  • Leave to appeal is granted as prayed.

Court disposition

suit dismissed as incompetent

  • The suit is dismissed for being brought against a non-existent party.
  • No order as to costs is made against a non-existent entity.
  • Leave to appeal is granted to the plaintiff.

Source and reliance status

High Court of Uganda

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Source document

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

High Court of Uganda

Judgment

[2008] UGHC 53

{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\uc1\deff0\stshfdbch0\stshfloch0\stshfhich0\stshfbi0\deflang2057\deflangfe2057{\fonttbl{\f0\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02020603050405020304}Times New Roman;}{\f149\froman\fcharset238\fprq2 Times New Roman CE;} {\f150\froman\fcharset204\fprq2 Times New Roman Cyr;}{\f152\froman\fcharset161\fprq2 Times New Roman Greek;}{\f153\froman\fcharset162\fprq2 Times New Roman Tur;}{\f154\froman\fcharset177\fprq2 Times New Roman (Hebrew);} {\f155\froman\fcharset178\fprq2 Times New Roman (Arabic);}{\f156\froman\fcharset186\fprq2 Times New Roman Baltic;}{\f157\froman\fcharset163\fprq2 Times New Roman (Vietnamese);}}{\colortbl;\red0\green0\blue0;\red0\green0\blue255;\red0\green255\blue255; \red0\green255\blue0;\red255\green0\blue255;\red255\green0\blue0;\red255\green255\blue0;\red255\green255\blue255;\red0\green0\blue128;\red0\green128\blue128;\red0\green128\blue0;\red128\green0\blue128;\red128\green0\blue0;\red128\green128\blue0; \red128\green128\blue128;\red192\green192\blue192;}{\stylesheet{\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe2057\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp2057 \snext0 Normal;}{\*\cs10 \additive \ssemihidden Default Paragraph

Font;}{\*\ts11\tsrowd\trftsWidthB3\trpaddl108\trpaddr108\trpaddfl3\trpaddft3\trpaddfb3\trpaddfr3\trcbpat1\trcfpat1\tscellwidthfts0\tsvertalt\tsbrdrt\tsbrdrl\tsbrdrb\tsbrdrr\tsbrdrdgl\tsbrdrdgr\tsbrdrh\tsbrdrv \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs20\lang1024\langfe1024\cgrid\langnp1024\langfenp1024 \snext11 \ssemihidden Normal Table;}{ \s15\ql \li0\ri0\sb100\sa100\sbauto1\saauto1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang2057\langfe2057\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp2057 \sbasedon0 \snext15 \styrsid9990571 Normal (Web);}} {\*\latentstyles\lsdstimax156\lsdlockeddef0}{\*\pgptbl {\pgp\ipgp0\itap0\li0\ri0\sb0\sa0}}{\*\rsidtbl \rsid5072506\rsid6377077\rsid7492967\rsid9005776\rsid9990571}{\*\generator Microsoft Word 11.0.5604;}{\info{\title THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA } {\author Administrator}{\operator jchemeri}{\creatim\yr2001\mo1\dy2\hr2\min39}{\revtim\yr2001\mo1\dy2\hr2\min45}{\version4}{\edmins6}{\nofpages3}{\nofwords352}{\nofchars2009}{\*\company

JSI}{\nofcharsws2357}{\vern24689}}\paperw11906\paperh16838 \widowctrl\ftnbj\aenddoc\noxlattoyen\expshrtn\noultrlspc\dntblnsbdb\nospaceforul\formshade\horzdoc\dgmargin\dghspace180\dgvspace180\dghorigin1800\dgvorigin1440\dghshow1\dgvshow1 \jexpand\viewkind1\viewscale100\pgbrdrhead\pgbrdrfoot\splytwnine\ftnlytwnine\htmautsp\nolnhtadjtbl\useltbaln\alntblind\lytcalctblwd\lyttblrtgr\lnbrkrule\nobrkwrptbl\snaptogridincell\allowfieldendsel\wrppunct \asianbrkrule\rsidroot9990571\newtblstyruls\nogrowautofit \fet0\sectd \linex0\headery708\footery708\colsx708\endnhere\sectlinegrid360\sectdefaultcl\sectrsid9005776\sftnbj {\*\pnseclvl1\pnucrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl2 \pnucltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl3\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl4\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl5\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl6 \pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl7\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl8\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl9\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}\pard\plain \s15\qc \li0\ri0\sb100\sa240\sbauto1\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\ipgp1\pararsid5072506

\fs24\lang2057\langfe2057\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp2057 { \b\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid9990571\charrsid9005776 THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA \line IN THE HIGH COURT OF UGANDA AT KAMPALA \line HCT-OO-CV-CS-0400-2007 \line BAGAMUHUNDA }{\b\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid7492967\charrsid9005776 VINCENT::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: PLAINTIFF}{\b\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid9990571\charrsid9005776 \line }{\b\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid5072506 \par }{\b\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid9990571\charrsid9005776 VERSUS \line }{\b\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid5072506 \par }\pard \s15\ql \li0\ri0\sb100\sa240\sbauto1\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\ipgp1\pararsid5072506 {\b\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid9990571\charrsid9005776 UGANDA ELECTRICITY BOARD::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::DEFENDANT }{\b\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid5072506 }{\b\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid9990571\charrsid9005776 (IN LIQUIDATION) \line }{ \b\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid5072506 \par }\pard \s15\ql \li0\ri0\sb100\sa240\sbauto1\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\ipgp1\pararsid7492967 {\b\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid9990571\charrsid9005776 BEFORE: }{ \b\ul\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid9990571\charrsid9005776 THE HONOURABLE MR.

JUSTICE YOROKAMU BAMWINE \line RULING: }{\b\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid9990571\charrsid9005776 \line }{ \lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid9990571\charrsid9005776 The plaintiff sued the defendant for a declaration that he is entitled to payment in lieu of notice of termination and on order that the case be computed and paid in accordance with the Employment Act. \line }{ \lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid7492967 \par }{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid9990571\charrsid9005776 When the suit came up for a Scheduling Conference on 11/11/2008, Mr. Wamala for the defendant raised a preliminary point of law. He argued that in terms of the }{ \b\i\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid9990571\charrsid9005776 Court of Appeal Civil Appeal No. 96 of 2004 Mavunwa Edson and Others }{\b\i\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid7492967\charrsid9005776 vs.}{ \b\i\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid9990571\charrsid9005776 Uganda Electricity Generation Company Ltd (UEGCL), }{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid9990571\charrsid9005776 UEB is non-existent. That the plaintiff has therefore sued a non-existent person. Counsel for the defendant sought an adjournment to seek further instructions in the matter. This being a point of law, I said I would peruse the jud gment of the Court of Appeal and decide whether it affects the instant matter. \par }\pard \s15\ql

\li0\ri0\sb100\sa240\sbauto1\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\ipgp1\pararsid6377077 {\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid9990571\charrsid9005776 I have now done so. \line }{ \lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid7492967 \par }{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid9990571\charrsid9005776 The said appeal was against the ruling of this court. The court had dismissed the appellant\rquote s suit on the ground that they had sued a wrong party. The view of the court in that matter was that the correct party to sue was UEB which was still alive for all intents and purposes. The Court of Appeal disagreed with this court and held that with the enactment of the Electricity Act 1999, UEB ceased to exist, it w as dissolved. This being a decision of an appellate court, it is binding on this court. Accordingly, I see no more room for argument on this issue. Once the legal position is that with the enactment of the Electricity Act, 1999, the defendant herein cease d to exist, that it was dissolved, then clearly the suit is against a non-existent party. It is misconceived, incompetent and bad in law. It ought to be dismissed in the terms of 0.6 r.29 of the Civil Procedure Act. \line }{ \lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid7492967 \par }{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid9990571\charrsid9005776 I do so. \line

}{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid7492967 \par }{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid9990571\charrsid9005776 There shall be no order as to costs against a non-existent entity. \line }{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid7492967 \par }{\b\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid7492967 Yorokamu Bamwine \line JUDGE}{\b\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid9990571\charrsid9005776 \line 17/11/2008 \line }{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid9990571\charrsid9005776 \par }{\b\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid9990571\charrsid9005776 17/11/08: \line }{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid9990571\charrsid9005776 Mr. Caleb Mugisha for plaintiffs. \line Parties absent. \line }{ \lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid7492967 \par }{\b\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid9990571\charrsid9005776 Court: \line }{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid9990571\charrsid9005776 Ruling delivered. \line }{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid7492967 \par }{\b\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid9990571\charrsid9005776 Mr. Caleb Mugisha: \line }{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid9990571\charrsid9005776 I would at this juncture pray for leave to appeal the decision. \line }{ \lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid7492967 \par }{\b\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid9990571\charrsid9005776 Court: \line }{\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid9990571\charrsid9005776 So be it. Leave granted as prayed. \par }\pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid6377077 \fs24\lang2057\langfe2057\cgrid\langnp2057\langfenp2057 {\lang1033\langfe2057\langnp1033\insrsid9990571\charrsid9005776 \par }}

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Court of Appeal Civil Appeal No. 96 of 2004 Mavunwa Edson and Others v Uganda Electricity Generation Company Ltd

Case cited

Electricity Act, 1999

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Civil Procedure Act, Order 6 Rule 29

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this JurisAssist collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.