Share
Attorney General v Henry Waibale and Others (Miscellaneous Application No 582 of 2005) (Miscellaneous Application No 582 of 2005) [2006] UGHC 27 (17 July 2006)
- Citation
- [2006] UGHC 27
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Uganda
- Court
- High Court of Uganda
- Posture
- Miscellaneous Cause / Ruling
- Case number
- Miscellaneous Application No 582 of 2005
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- High Court of Uganda
- Posture
- Miscellaneous Cause / Ruling
- Case number
- Miscellaneous Application No 582 of 2005
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The court held that since the suit was filed after SI 80 of 2000 came into force, the law applies to the issues raised in it. The fact that the claim survived and was entertained up to judgment means the applicants are entitled to benefit from the regime set out in SI 80 of 2000, even if only as a guide. Furthermore, Article 254 of the Constitution guarantees the pension rights of public officers, and if unpaid, they can claim it. Therefore, the law in question should be used in determining the claims of the applicants/plaintiffs, regardless of their retirement date.
Court disposition
Application allowed. The claims of the applicants/plaintiffs are to be determined under SI 80 of 2000 and Article 254 of the Constitution.
Orders
- The claims of the applicants/plaintiffs shall be determined using the provisions of SI 80 of 2000 and Article 254 of the Constitution.
02
Material facts
Parties
Henry Waibale & 2 Ors
ApplicantAttorney General
Respondent03
Procedural history
Posture
Miscellaneous Cause / Ruling
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether Statutory Instrument 80 of 2000 applies to respondents who retired before its commencement.
- 02
Whether the applicants/plaintiffs can benefit from the regime set out in SI 80 of 2000.
- 03
Whether Article 254 of the Constitution guarantees pension rights for public officers whose pensions remain unpaid.
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The applicants argued that their claim for pension survived and was entertained up to the point of judgment, and therefore they should benefit from the provisions of SI 80 of 2000, even though they retired before it came into force. They also relied on Article 254 of the Constitution, which guarantees pension rights for public officers.
- Respondent
- The respondent contended that SI 80 of 2000 should not apply to the applicants, as they retired long before the statutory instrument came into force, and thus their claims should not be determined under its provisions.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Statutory Instrument 80 of 2000
A law that comes into force before the determination of a claim may apply to issues raised in the suit, even if the events occurred prior to its commencement.
- 02
Constitution of Uganda, Article 254
Article 254 of the Constitution guarantees the pension rights of public officers, allowing them to claim unpaid pension regardless of subsequent statutory changes.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The court held that since the suit was filed after SI 80 of 2000 came into force, the law applies to the issues raised in it. The fact that the claim survived and was entertained up to judgment means the applicants are entitled to benefit from the regime set out in SI 80 of 2000, even if only as a guide. Furthermore, Article 254 of the Constitution guarantees the pension rights of public officers, and if unpaid, they can claim it. Therefore, the law in question should be used in determining the claims of the applicants/plaintiffs, regardless of their retirement date.
Obiter and limits
- Even if only the provisions of SI 80 of 2000 serve as a guide, the applicants may have been brought within its ambit by the continued existence of their claim.
- The constitutional guarantee of pension rights for public officers is paramount and not negated by statutory changes.
Court disposition
Application allowed. The claims of the applicants/plaintiffs are to be determined under SI 80 of 2000 and Article 254 of the Constitution.
- The claims of the applicants/plaintiffs shall be determined using the provisions of SI 80 of 2000 and Article 254 of the Constitution.
Source and reliance status
High Court of Uganda
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
High Court of Uganda
Judgment
{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\uc1\deff0\stshfdbch0\stshfloch0\stshfhich0\stshfbi0\deflang1033\deflangfe1033{\fonttbl{\f0\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose 02020603050405020304}Times New Roman;}{\f273\froman\fcharset238\fprq2 Times New Roman CE;} {\f274\froman\fcharset204\fprq2 Times New Roman Cyr;}{\f276\froman\fcharset161\fprq2 Times New Roman Greek;}{\f277\froman\fcharset162\fprq2 Times New Roman Tur;}{\f278\froman\fcharset177\fprq2 Times New Roman (Hebrew);} {\f279\froman\fcharset178\fprq2 Times New Roman (Arabic);}{\f280\froman\fcharset186\fprq2 Times New Roman Baltic;}{\f281\froman\fcharset163\fprq2 Times New Roman (Vietnamese);}}{\colortbl;\red0\green0\blue0;\red0\green0\blue255;\red0\green255\blue255; \red0\green255\blue0;\red255\green0\blue255;\red255\green0\blue0;\red255\green255\blue0;\red255\green255\blue255;\red0\green0\blue128;\red0\green128\blue128;\red0\green128\blue0;\red128\green0\blue128;\red128\green0\blue0;\red128\green128\blue0; \red128\green128\blue128;\red192\green192\blue192;}{\stylesheet{\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \snext0 Normal;}{\*\cs10 \additive \ssemihidden Default Paragraph
Font;}{\*\ts11\tsrowd\trftsWidthB3\trpaddl108\trpaddr108\trpaddfl3\trpaddft3\trpaddfb3\trpaddfr3\trcbpat1\trcfpat1\tscellwidthfts0\tsvertalt\tsbrdrt\tsbrdrl\tsbrdrb\tsbrdrr\tsbrdrdgl\tsbrdrdgr\tsbrdrh\tsbrdrv \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs20\lang1024\langfe1024\cgrid\langnp1024\langfenp1024 \snext11 \ssemihidden Normal Table;}{\s15\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar \tqc\tx4320\tqr\tx8640\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext15 \styrsid14560364 footer;}{\*\cs16 \additive \sbasedon10 \styrsid14560364 page number;}{ \s17\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\tqc\tx4320\tqr\tx8640\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext17 \styrsid3081289 header;}}{\*\latentstyles\lsdstimax156\lsdlockeddef0} {\*\rsidtbl \rsid934969\rsid3030153\rsid3081289\rsid4095740\rsid5272776\rsid5524934\rsid6816355\rsid6847837\rsid8148220\rsid8476580\rsid9986964\rsid10508503\rsid13115461\rsid14560364\rsid15029317\rsid15092779\rsid15757064\rsid16341357\rsid16386418 \rsid16712260}{\*\generator Microsoft Word 11.0.5604;}{\info{\title THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA}{\author amilly}{\operator
owner}{\creatim\yr2008\mo3\dy25\hr15\min6}{\revtim\yr2008\mo3\dy25\hr15\min6}{\version2}{\edmins1}{\nofpages1}{\nofwords175} {\nofchars998}{\*\company Courts Of Judicature}{\nofcharsws1171}{\vern24689}}\widowctrl\ftnbj\aenddoc\noxlattoyen\expshrtn\noultrlspc\dntblnsbdb\nospaceforul\formshade\horzdoc\dgmargin\dghspace180\dgvspace180\dghorigin1800\dgvorigin1440\dghshow1\dgvshow1 \jexpand\viewkind1\viewscale100\pgbrdrhead\pgbrdrfoot\splytwnine\ftnlytwnine\htmautsp\nolnhtadjtbl\useltbaln\alntblind\lytcalctblwd\lyttblrtgr\lnbrkrule\nobrkwrptbl\snaptogridincell\allowfieldendsel\wrppunct \asianbrkrule\rsidroot8148220\newtblstyruls\nogrowautofit \fet0{\*\ftnsep \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid5524934 \chftnsep \par }}{\*\ftnsepc \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid5524934 \chftnsepc \par }}{\*\aftnsep \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid5524934 \chftnsep \par }}{\*\aftnsepc \pard\plain \ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid5524934
\chftnsepc \par }}\sectd \linex0\headery708\footery708\colsx708\endnhere\sectlinegrid360\sectdefaultcl\sftnbj {\footer \pard\plain \s15\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar \tqc\tx4320\tqr\tx8640\pvpara\phmrg\posxr\posy0\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid3030153 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\cs16\insrsid16712260 \par }\pard \s15\ql \li0\ri360\widctlpar\tqc\tx4320\tqr\tx8640\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin360\lin0\itap0\pararsid3081289 {\insrsid16712260 \par }}{\*\pnseclvl1\pnucrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl2\pnucltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl3\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl4\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta )}} {\*\pnseclvl5\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl6\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl7\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl8 \pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl9\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}\pard\plain \qc \li0\ri0\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid3081289 \fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 {\insrsid8148220\charrsid3081289 THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA}{\insrsid934969\charrsid3081289 \par
}{\insrsid8148220\charrsid3081289 IN THE HIGH COURT OF UGANDA AT KAMPALA \par }{\b\insrsid3081289\charrsid3081289 MISCELLANEOUS CAUSE NO}{\b\insrsid8148220\charrsid3081289 58}{\b\insrsid4095740\charrsid3081289 2}{\b\insrsid8148220\charrsid3081289 OF 2005 \par }{\insrsid3081289 (Arising Out Of HHCS}{\insrsid3081289\charrsid3081289 No. 164 of 2004)}{\insrsid8148220\charrsid3081289 \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid3081289 {\insrsid8148220\charrsid3081289 \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10508503 {\insrsid8148220\charrsid3081289 ATTORNEY GENERAL}{\insrsid3081289\charrsid3081289 \'85\'85\'85\'85\'85\'85\'85\'85\'85\'85\'85\'85\'85\'85}{ \insrsid9986964 \'85}{\insrsid3081289\charrsid3081289 \'85.}{\insrsid8148220\charrsid3081289 RESPONDENT}{\insrsid4095740\charrsid3081289 }{\insrsid6816355\charrsid3081289 \par }\pard \qc \li0\ri0\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid3081289 {\insrsid4095740\charrsid3081289 VS. \par }\pard \ql \li0\ri0\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid3081289 {\insrsid4095740\charrsid3081289 HENRY WAIBALE & 2 ORS }{\insrsid3081289\charrsid3081289
\'85\'85\'85\'85\'85\'85\'85\'85\'85\'85\'85\'85\'85 \'85..}{\insrsid4095740\charrsid3081289 APPLICANTS \par }{\insrsid3081289\charrsid3081289 \par }{\b\ul\insrsid4095740\charrsid3081289 BEFORE: HON. MR. JUSTICE R. O. OKUMU WENGI: \par }{\b\ul\insrsid13115461\charrsid3081289 \par }\pard \qj \li0\ri0\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid3081289 {\b\ul\insrsid14560364\charrsid3081289 RULING: \par \par }{\insrsid13115461\charrsid3081289 The question whether SI 80 of 2000 applies to the respondents who retired long before its coming into force has been referred for settlement. This suit was itself filed in 2004 after the SI 80 came into force and as such is a law applying to issues raised in it. The fact that the claim by the plaintiffs survived and was entertained up to the point of judgment means that they are able to benefit from the regime set out in that law even if only its pro}{ \insrsid14560364\charrsid3081289 v}{\insrsid15757064\charrsid3081289 i}{\insrsid14560364\charrsid3081289 si}{\insrsid15757064\charrsid3081289 o}{\insrsid14560364\charrsid3081289 n}{\insrsid15757064\charrsid3081289 s }{\insrsid16341357\charrsid3081289 were a mere guide. And since their claim }{\insrsid14560364\charrsid3081289 is containing until settled in the suit }{\insrsid16341357\charrsid3081289 they may actually have been dragged into its
ambit}{\insrsid16386418\charrsid3081289 . But even more importantly article 254 of the constitution guarantees pension rights of public officers such that if it is unpaid they can claim it. Therefore the law in question should be used in determining the claims of the applicants/plaintiffs.}{ \insrsid13115461\charrsid3081289 \par }{\insrsid16386418\charrsid3081289 \par R. O. Okumu Wengi \par }{\b\ul\insrsid16386418\charrsid3081289 JUDGE \par }\pard \qj \li0\ri0\sl360\slmult1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid10508503 {\b\insrsid16386418\charrsid3081289 17/7/2006 \par }}
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.