Download

Uganda Judgment

African Court on Human and Peoples Rights

Association Juristes D'Afrique pour la Bonne Gouvernance c. Côte d'Ivoire (Application No. 006/2011) [2011] AfCHPR 50 (16 June 2011)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The African Court determined that it lacked jurisdiction to entertain the application filed by the Association Juristes d'Afrique pour la Bonne Gouvernance against the Republic of Cote d'Ivoire because the applicant NGO did not possess observer status before the African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights, as required by Article 5(3) of the Protocol. The Court verified this status with the Commission, which confirmed the absence of observer status. Consequently, the Court was not entitled to receive the application. In accordance with Article 6(3) of the Protocol, and given the nature of the allegations, the Court found it appropriate to transfer the application to the African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights for further consideration.

Court disposition

Application dismissed for lack of jurisdiction and transferred to the African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights.

Orders

  • The Court has no jurisdiction to receive the application filed by the Association Juristes d'Afrique pour la Bonne Gouvernance against the Republic of Cote d'Ivoire.
  • The application is transferred to the African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights.

02

Material facts

Parties

Association Juristes d'Afrique pour la Bonne Gouvernance

Applicant Counsel: Kack Kack Serge Simon

Republic of Cote d'Ivoire

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Application / Jurisdictional Determination

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The applicant, Association Juristes d'Afrique pour la Bonne Gouvernance, alleged violations of Articles 2, 4, 5, and 6 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights by the Republic of Cote d'Ivoire and sought to institute proceedings directly before the African Court. The application was submitted through its Executive President and legal counsel, asserting its right to access the Court for redress of alleged human rights violations.
Respondent
The respondent, Republic of Cote d'Ivoire, did not file arguments at this stage as the matter was determined on jurisdictional grounds. The Court's inquiry focused on the applicant's standing and observer status, which was confirmed as lacking by the African Commission's Secretariat.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Article 5(3) of the Protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights on the Establishment of an African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights

    Only NGOs with observer status before the African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights may institute cases directly before the African Court.

  2. 02

    Article 6(3) of the Protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights on the Establishment of an African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights

    The Court may consider cases or transfer them to the Commission if it lacks jurisdiction.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The African Court determined that it lacked jurisdiction to entertain the application filed by the Association Juristes d'Afrique pour la Bonne Gouvernance against the Republic of Cote d'Ivoire because the applicant NGO did not possess observer status before the African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights, as required by Article 5(3) of the Protocol. The Court verified this status with the Commission, which confirmed the absence of observer status. Consequently, the Court was not entitled to receive the application. In accordance with Article 6(3) of the Protocol, and given the nature of the allegations, the Court found it appropriate to transfer the application to the African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights for further consideration.

Obiter and limits

  • The Court notes that the French text of the decision is authoritative.
  • The recusal of Mr. Sylvain ORE, a member of the Court of Ivorian nationality, was in accordance with Article 22 of the Protocol and Rule 8(2) of the Rules of Court.

Court disposition

Application dismissed for lack of jurisdiction and transferred to the African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights.

  • The Court has no jurisdiction to receive the application filed by the Association Juristes d'Afrique pour la Bonne Gouvernance against the Republic of Cote d'Ivoire.
  • The application is transferred to the African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights.

Source and reliance status

African Court on Human and Peoples Rights

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Source document

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

African Court on Human and Peoples Rights

Judgment

[2011] AfCHPR 50

AFRICAN UNION

![](_page_0_Picture_1.jpeg)

UNION AFRICAINE

UNIÃO AFRICANA

الاتحاد الأقريقي

AFRICAN COURT ON HUMAN AND PEOPLES' RIGHTS COUR AFRICAINE DES DROITS DE L'HOMME ET DES PEUPLES

IN THE MATTER OF

ASSOCIATION JURISTES D'AFRIQUE POUR LA BONNE GOUVERNANCE

$\mathbf{v}$ .

REPUBLIC OF COTE D'IVOIRE

APPLICATION No. 006/2011

DECISION

The Court composed of: Gérard NYIYUNGEKO, President; Sophia A. B. AKUFFO, Vice President; Jean MUTSINZI, Bernard M. NGOEPE, Modibo T. GUINDO, Fatsah OUGUERGOUZ, Joseph N. MULENGA, Augustino S. L. RAMADHANI, Duncan TAMBALA and Elsie N. THOMPSON-Judges; and Robert ENO-Acting Registrar,

In the matter of:

ASSOCIATION JURISTES D'AFRIQUE POUR LA BONNE GOUVERNANCE

v.

REPUBLIC OF COTE D'IVOIRE

After deliberations,

makes the following decision:

- By an application of 2 May, 2011, the Association Juristes $\mathbf{1}_{\cdot}$ d'Afrique pour la bonne gouvernance, with headquarters in Douala (Cameroon), through Barrister Kack Kack Serge Simon, Executive President and Lawyer with the Cameroon Bar Association, resident in Douala, submitted a complaint to the Court against the Republic of Côte d'Ivoire, for violation of Articles 2, 4, 5 and 6 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights. - In accordance with Article 22 of the Protocol to the African Charter $2.$ of Human and Peoples' Rights on the Establishment of an African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights (hereinafter referred to as the Protocol), and Rule 8(2) of the Rules of Court (hereinafter referred

$\overbrace{\mathbf{Q}}^{\mathbf{Q}}$

to as the Rules), Mr. Sylvain ORE, a member of this Court of Ivorian nationality, recused himself.

- In accordance with Rule 34(1) of the Rules, the Registry 3. acknowledged receipt of the application, through a letter of 5 May. 2011. - Article 5 (3) of the Protocol provides that "The Court may entitle $\mathbf{4}_{\cdot}$ relevant non governmental organizations (NGOs) with observer status before the Commission, and individuals to institute cases directly before it, in accordance with Article 34 (6) of this Protocol". - It is clear from this provision that any non-governmental $5.$ organization that submits a complaint directly to the Court under Article 34 (6) of the Protocol must have observer status before the African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights. - By letter of 15 June, 2011, the Registry inquired from the 6. Commission if the Association Juristes d'Afrique pour la bonne *gouvernance* has observer status with it. - By email of 16 June, 2011, the Secretariat of the African 7. Commission informed the Registry that the Association Juristes d'Afrique pour la bonne gouvernance does not have observer status with the Commission. - The Court notes therefore that the Association of African Lawyers 8. for Good Governance is not entitled to seize it. - It can be concluded that having regard to Article 5(3) of the 9. Protocol, the Court does not have jurisdiction to receive the application submitted by the Association Juristes d'Afrique pour la bonne gouvernance against the Republic of Côte d'Ivoire.

$\frac{\mathcal{N}^{\mathcal{C}}_{\mathcal{C}}}{\mathcal{D}}$

Article 6 (3) of the Protocol provides that "The Court may consider $10.$ cases or transfer them to the Commission". The Court notes that in view of the allegations raised in the application, it would be appropriate to transfer the case to the African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights.

For these reasons,

THE COURT,

Unanimously:

- 1. Decides that by virtue of Article 5 (3) of the Protocol, it has no jurisdiction to receive the application filed by the Association Juristes d'Afrique pour la bonne gouvernance against the Republic of Côte d'Ivoire. - 2. Decides, pursuant to Article 6 (3) of the Protocol, to transfer the application to the African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights.

Done in Arusha, this Sixteenth Day of June Two Thousand and Eleven, in French and in English, the French text being authoritative.

Signed:

Gérard NIYUNGEKO, President,

Robert ENO, Acting Registrar.

![](_page_3_Picture_11.jpeg)

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Article 2 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Article 4 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Article 5 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Article 6 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Article 5(3) of the Protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights on the Establishment of an African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Article 6(3) of the Protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights on the Establishment of an African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this JurisAssist collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.